Skip to main content

Abstract

A novel memory-oriented OWL storage system is proposed. Semantic Web is recognized as the next generation Web and OWL (Web Ontology Language) is one of the most important technologies to achieve the Semantic Web. Even though several memory-oriented storage systems have been proposed to manage and handle OWL documents, they still suffer from low performance. In this paper, we propose a new memory-based OWL storage system to resolve the problem. This paper describes the proposed storage model and shows the experiment and comparison result. The evaluation result shows our storage system provides higher performance than other systems. Therefore, it enables us to develop and provides high quality Semantic Web services.

This work was supported in part by MIC & IITA through IT Leading R&D Support Project.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Yergeau, F., Cowan, J., Bray, T., Paoli, J., Sperberg-McQueen, C.M., Maler, E.: Extensible Markup Language (XML) 1.1, W3C Recommendation, February 4 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Resource Description Framework (RDF), http://www.w3.org/RDF/

  3. Dave Bechett, RDF/XML Syntax Specification (Revised), W3C Recommendation, February 10 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Connolly, D., van Harmelen, F., Horrocks, I., McGuinness, D.L., Patel-Schneider, P.F., Stein, L.A.: DAML+OIL Reference Description. W3C Note, December 18 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Smith, M.K., Welty, C., McGuinness, D.L. (eds.): OWL Web Ontology Language Guide, W3C Recommendation, February 10 (2004), http://www.w2.org/TR/2004/REC-owl-guide-20040210/

  6. del Mar Roldan-Garcia, M., Aldana-Montes, J.F.: A Tool for Storing OWL Using Database Technology (November 2005)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Pan, Z., Heflin, J.: DLDB: Extending Relational Databases to Support Semantic Web Queries. In: Workshop on Practical and Scaleable Semantic Web Systems, The 2nd International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC 2003) (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Broekstra, J., Kampman, A.: Sesame: A Generic Architecture for Storing and Querying RDF and RDF Schema. In: Horrocks, I., Hendler, J. (eds.) ISWC 2002. LNCS, vol. 2342, Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  9. OWLJessKB: A Semantic Web Reasoning Tool, http://edge.cs.drexel.edu/assemblies/software/owljesskb/

  10. Grosof, B.N., Horrocks, I., Volz, R., Decker, S.: Description Logic Programms: Combining Logic Programms with Description Logic. In: Proceedings of the 12th international World Wide Web Conference (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Horrocks, I., Li, L., Turi, D., Bechhofer, S.: The Instance Store: Description Logic Reasoning with Large Numbers of Individuals (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  12. SourceForge.net, Jena2 Database Interface - Database Layout (November 2004), http://jena.sourceforge.net/DB/layout.html

  13. Jena: A Semantic Web Framework for Java, http://jena.sourceforge.net/

  14. Jess: A Rule Engine for the Java Platform, http://herzberg.ca.sandia.gov/jess/

  15. Gensereth, M., Fikes, R.: Knowledge Interchange Format, Stanford Logic Report Logic, Stanford University, http://logic.stanford.edu/kif/kif.html

  16. Karvounarakis, G., Magkanaraki, A., Alexaki, S., Christophides, V., Plexousakis, D., Scholl, M., Tolle, K.: Querying the Semantic Web with RQL, Elsevier Science. Computer Networks and ISDN Systems Journal 42(5), 617–640 (2003)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Eric Prud’hommeaux and Andy Seaborne, SPARQL Query Language for RDF, W3C Candidate Recommendation, April 6 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Carroll, J.J., De Roo, J.: OWL Web Ontology Language Test Cases. W3C Recommendation (February 10, 2004)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Guo, Y.: Data Generator(UBA): UBA1.7, http://swat.cse.lehigh.edu/projects/lubm/

  20. Guo, Y., Pan, Z., Heflin, J.: An Evaluation of Knowledge Base Systems for Large OWL Datasets. In: McIlraith, S.A., Plexousakis, D., van Harmelen, F. (eds.) ISWC 2004. LNCS, vol. 3298, pp. 274–288. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  21. Guo, Y., Pan, Z., Heflin, J.: LUBM: A Benchmark for OWL Knowledge Base Systems. Journal of Web Semantics (2005)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Jeong, D., Choi, M., Jeon, YS., Han, YH., Jeong, YS., Han, SK. (2006). A Novel Memory-Oriented OWL Storage System. In: Min, G., Di Martino, B., Yang, L.T., Guo, M., Rünger, G. (eds) Frontiers of High Performance Computing and Networking – ISPA 2006 Workshops. ISPA 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4331. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11942634_55

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11942634_55

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-49860-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-49862-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics