Skip to main content

Ranking Sports Teams and the Inverse Equal Paths Problem

  • Conference paper
Internet and Network Economics (WINE 2006)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 4286))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The problem of rank aggregation has been studied in contexts varying from sports, to multi-criteria decision making, to machine learning, to academic citations, to ranking web pages, and to descriptive decision theory. Rank aggregation is the mapping of inputs that rank subsets of a set of objects into a consistent ranking that represents in some meaningful way the various inputs. In the ranking of sports competitors, or academic citations or ranking of web pages the inputs are in the form of pairwise comparisons. We present here a new paradigm using an optimization framework that addresses major shortcomings in current models of aggregate ranking. Ranking methods are often criticized for being subjective and ignoring some factors or emphasizing others. In the ranking scheme here subjective considerations can be easily incorporated while their contributions to the overall ranking are made explicit.

The inverse equal paths problem is introduced here, and is shown to be tightly linked to the problem of aggregate ranking “optimally”. This framework is useful in making an optimization framework available and by introducing specific performance measures for the quality of the aggregate ranking as per its deviations from the input rankings provided. Presented as inverse equal paths problem we devise for the aggregate ranking problem polynomial time combinatorial algorithms for convex penalty functions of the deviations; and show the NP-hardness of some forms of nonlinear penalty functions. Interestingly, the algorithmic setup of the problem is that of a network flow problem.

We compare the equal paths scheme here to the eigenvector method, Google PageRank for ranking web sites, and the academic citation method for ranking academic papers.

Research supported in part by NSF award No. DMI-0620677.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ali, I., Cook, W.D., Kress, M.: Ordinal ranking and intensity of preference: a linear programming approach. Management Science 32, 1642–1647 (1986)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Ahuja, R.K., Orlin, J.B.: Inverse optimization. Operations Research 49, 771–783 (2001)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Ahuja, R.K., Hochbaum, D.S., Orlin, J.B.: Solving the convex cost integer dual of minimum cost network flow problem. Management Science 49, 950–964 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ahuja, R.K., Hochbaum, D.S., Orlin, J.B.: A cut based algorithm for the nonlinear dual of the minimum cost network flow problem. Algorithmica 39, 189–208 (2004)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Buchanan, M.: Top rank. Nature Physics 2, 361 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Burton, D., Toint, P.L.: On an instance of the inverse shortest paths problem. Mathematical Programming 53, 45–61 (1992)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Burton, D., Toint, P.L.: On the use of an inverse shortest paths algorithm for recovering linearly correlated costs. Mathematical Programming 63, 1–22 (1994)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Chandran, B., Golden, B., Wasil, E.: Linear programming models for estimating weights in the analytic hierarchy process. Computers and Operations Research 32, 2213–2234 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Chen, P., Xie, H., Maslov, S., Redner, S.: Finding scientific gems with Google 1, 18 (2006) arXuv:physics/0604130

    Google Scholar 

  10. Chien, S., Dwork, C., Kumar, R., Simon, D.R., Sivakumar, D.: Link Evolution: Analysis and Algorithms. Internet Mathematics 1, 277–304 (2004)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. David, H.A.: The Method of Paired Comparisons, 2nd edn. Charles Griffin and Company Ltd. and Oxford University Press, London (1988)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Hochbaum, D.S., Levin, A.: Methodologies and algorithms for group rankings decision. Management Science (to appear)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hochbaum, D.S., Shanthikumar, J.G.: Convex Separable Optimization is not Much Harder Than Linear Optimization. Journal of the ACM 37, 843–862 (1990)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Hochbaum, D.S.: An efficient algorithm for image segmentation, Markov Random Fields and related problems. Journal of the ACM 48, 686–701 (2001)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Keener, J.P.: The Perron-Frobenius theorem and the ranking of football teams. SIAM Review 35, 80–93 (1993)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Kemeny, J.G., Snell, J.L.: Preference ranking: An axiomatic approach. In: Mathematical models in the social sciences, Boston, Ginn, pp. 9–23 (1962)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kleinberg, J., Tardos, J.: Approximation algorithms for classification problems with pairwise relationships: Metric labeling and Markov random fields. In: Proceedings of the 40th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, pp. 14–23 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Laininen, P., Hämääinen, R.P.: Analyzing AHP-matrices by regression. European Journal of Operational Research 148, 514–524 (2003)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Park, J., Newman, M.E.J.: A network-based ranking system for US college football 4, 31 (2005) arXiv:physics/0505169

    Google Scholar 

  20. Saaty, T.: A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures. Journal of Math. Psychology 15, 234–281 (1977)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Saaty, T.: The Analytic Hierarchy Process. McGraw-Hill, New York (1980)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Saaty, T., Vargas, L.G.: Comparison of eigenvalue, logarithmic least squares and least squares methods in estimating ratios. Journal of Mathematical Modeling 5, 309–324 (1984)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  23. Vargas, R.S.: Matrix Iterative Analysis. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1962)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Wang, Y.M., Yang, J.B., Xu, D.L.: Mathematical Programming Methods for Generating weights from Interval Comparison Matrices. Internet (retrieved, July 2004), http://www.sm.umist.ac.uk/wp/abstract/wp0205.htm

  25. Zhang, J., Ma, Z., Yang, C.: A column generation method for inverse shortest paths problems. J. ZOR Mathematical Methods of Operations Research 41, 347–358 (1995)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Hochbaum, D.S. (2006). Ranking Sports Teams and the Inverse Equal Paths Problem. In: Spirakis, P., Mavronicolas, M., Kontogiannis, S. (eds) Internet and Network Economics. WINE 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4286. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11944874_28

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11944874_28

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-68138-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-68141-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics