Abstract
The problem of rank aggregation has been studied in contexts varying from sports, to multi-criteria decision making, to machine learning, to academic citations, to ranking web pages, and to descriptive decision theory. Rank aggregation is the mapping of inputs that rank subsets of a set of objects into a consistent ranking that represents in some meaningful way the various inputs. In the ranking of sports competitors, or academic citations or ranking of web pages the inputs are in the form of pairwise comparisons. We present here a new paradigm using an optimization framework that addresses major shortcomings in current models of aggregate ranking. Ranking methods are often criticized for being subjective and ignoring some factors or emphasizing others. In the ranking scheme here subjective considerations can be easily incorporated while their contributions to the overall ranking are made explicit.
The inverse equal paths problem is introduced here, and is shown to be tightly linked to the problem of aggregate ranking “optimally”. This framework is useful in making an optimization framework available and by introducing specific performance measures for the quality of the aggregate ranking as per its deviations from the input rankings provided. Presented as inverse equal paths problem we devise for the aggregate ranking problem polynomial time combinatorial algorithms for convex penalty functions of the deviations; and show the NP-hardness of some forms of nonlinear penalty functions. Interestingly, the algorithmic setup of the problem is that of a network flow problem.
We compare the equal paths scheme here to the eigenvector method, Google PageRank for ranking web sites, and the academic citation method for ranking academic papers.
Research supported in part by NSF award No. DMI-0620677.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Ali, I., Cook, W.D., Kress, M.: Ordinal ranking and intensity of preference: a linear programming approach. Management Science 32, 1642–1647 (1986)
Ahuja, R.K., Orlin, J.B.: Inverse optimization. Operations Research 49, 771–783 (2001)
Ahuja, R.K., Hochbaum, D.S., Orlin, J.B.: Solving the convex cost integer dual of minimum cost network flow problem. Management Science 49, 950–964 (2003)
Ahuja, R.K., Hochbaum, D.S., Orlin, J.B.: A cut based algorithm for the nonlinear dual of the minimum cost network flow problem. Algorithmica 39, 189–208 (2004)
Buchanan, M.: Top rank. Nature Physics 2, 361 (2006)
Burton, D., Toint, P.L.: On an instance of the inverse shortest paths problem. Mathematical Programming 53, 45–61 (1992)
Burton, D., Toint, P.L.: On the use of an inverse shortest paths algorithm for recovering linearly correlated costs. Mathematical Programming 63, 1–22 (1994)
Chandran, B., Golden, B., Wasil, E.: Linear programming models for estimating weights in the analytic hierarchy process. Computers and Operations Research 32, 2213–2234 (2005)
Chen, P., Xie, H., Maslov, S., Redner, S.: Finding scientific gems with Google 1, 18 (2006) arXuv:physics/0604130
Chien, S., Dwork, C., Kumar, R., Simon, D.R., Sivakumar, D.: Link Evolution: Analysis and Algorithms. Internet Mathematics 1, 277–304 (2004)
David, H.A.: The Method of Paired Comparisons, 2nd edn. Charles Griffin and Company Ltd. and Oxford University Press, London (1988)
Hochbaum, D.S., Levin, A.: Methodologies and algorithms for group rankings decision. Management Science (to appear)
Hochbaum, D.S., Shanthikumar, J.G.: Convex Separable Optimization is not Much Harder Than Linear Optimization. Journal of the ACM 37, 843–862 (1990)
Hochbaum, D.S.: An efficient algorithm for image segmentation, Markov Random Fields and related problems. Journal of the ACM 48, 686–701 (2001)
Keener, J.P.: The Perron-Frobenius theorem and the ranking of football teams. SIAM Review 35, 80–93 (1993)
Kemeny, J.G., Snell, J.L.: Preference ranking: An axiomatic approach. In: Mathematical models in the social sciences, Boston, Ginn, pp. 9–23 (1962)
Kleinberg, J., Tardos, J.: Approximation algorithms for classification problems with pairwise relationships: Metric labeling and Markov random fields. In: Proceedings of the 40th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, pp. 14–23 (1999)
Laininen, P., Hämääinen, R.P.: Analyzing AHP-matrices by regression. European Journal of Operational Research 148, 514–524 (2003)
Park, J., Newman, M.E.J.: A network-based ranking system for US college football 4, 31 (2005) arXiv:physics/0505169
Saaty, T.: A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures. Journal of Math. Psychology 15, 234–281 (1977)
Saaty, T.: The Analytic Hierarchy Process. McGraw-Hill, New York (1980)
Saaty, T., Vargas, L.G.: Comparison of eigenvalue, logarithmic least squares and least squares methods in estimating ratios. Journal of Mathematical Modeling 5, 309–324 (1984)
Vargas, R.S.: Matrix Iterative Analysis. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1962)
Wang, Y.M., Yang, J.B., Xu, D.L.: Mathematical Programming Methods for Generating weights from Interval Comparison Matrices. Internet (retrieved, July 2004), http://www.sm.umist.ac.uk/wp/abstract/wp0205.htm
Zhang, J., Ma, Z., Yang, C.: A column generation method for inverse shortest paths problems. J. ZOR Mathematical Methods of Operations Research 41, 347–358 (1995)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Hochbaum, D.S. (2006). Ranking Sports Teams and the Inverse Equal Paths Problem. In: Spirakis, P., Mavronicolas, M., Kontogiannis, S. (eds) Internet and Network Economics. WINE 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4286. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11944874_28
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11944874_28
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-68138-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-68141-0
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)