Skip to main content

Mechanisms with Verification for Any Finite Domain

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 4286))

Abstract

In this work we study mechanisms with verification, as introduced by Nisan and Ronen [STOC 1999], to solve problems involving selfish agents. We provide a technique for designing truthful mechanisms with verification that optimally solve the underlying optimization problem. Problems (optimally) solved with our technique belong to a rich class that includes, as special cases, utilitarian problems and many others considered in literature for so called one-parameter agents (e.g., the make-span). Our technique extends the one recently presented by Auletta et al [ICALP 2006] as it works for any finite multi-dimensional valuation domain. As special case we obtain an alternative technique to optimally solve (though not in polynomial-time) Scheduling Unrelated Machines studied (and solved) by Nisan and Ronen. Interestingly enough, our technique also solves the case of compound agents (i.e., agents declaring more than a value). As an application we provide the first optimal truthful mechanism with verification for Scheduling Unrelated Machines in which every selfish agent controls more than one (unrelated) machine. We also provide methods leading to approximate solutions obtained with polynomial-time truthful mechanisms with verification. With such methods we obtain polynomial-time truthful mechanisms with verification for smooth problems involving compound agents composed by one-parameter valuations. Finally, we investigate the construction of mechanisms (with verification) for infinite domains. We show that existing techniques to obtain truthful mechanisms (for the case in which verification is not allowed), dealing with infinite domains, could completely annul advantages that verification implies.

Research partially supported by the European Project FP6-15964, Algorithmic Principles for Building Efficient Overlay Computers (AEOLUS).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Andelman, N., Azar, Y., Sorani, M.: Truthful approximation mechanisms for scheduling selfish related machines. In: Diekert, V., Durand, B. (eds.) STACS 2005. LNCS, vol. 3404, pp. 69–82. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Archer, A., Tardos, E.: Truthful mechanisms for one-parameter agents. In: Proc. of FOCS (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Auletta, V., De Prisco, R., Penna, P., Persiano, G.: Deterministic truthful approximation mechanisms for scheduling related machines. In: Diekert, V., Habib, M. (eds.) STACS 2004. LNCS, vol. 2996, pp. 608–619. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Auletta, V., De Prisco, R., Penna, P., Persiano, G.: The power of verification for one-parameter agents. In: Díaz, J., Karhumäki, J., Lepistö, A., Sannella, D. (eds.) ICALP 2004. LNCS, vol. 3142, pp. 171–182. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Auletta, V., De Prisco, R., Penna, P., Persiano, G., Ventre, C.: New constructions of mechanisms with verification. In: Bugliesi, M., Preneel, B., Sassone, V., Wegener, I. (eds.) ICALP 2006. LNCS, vol. 4051, pp. 596–607. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Bikhchandani, S., Chatterji, S., Lavi, R., Mualem, A., Nisan, N., Sen, A.: Weak monotonicity characterizes deterministic dominant-strategy implementation. Econometrica (to appear, 2006)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bilò, D., Gualà, L., Proietti, G.: On the existence of truthful mechanisms for the minimum-cost approximated shortest-paths tree problem. Technical report (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Briest, P., Krysta, P., Vöcking, B.: Approximation techniques for utilitarian mechanims design. In: Proc. of STOC (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Clarke, E.H.: Multipart Pricing of Public Goods. Public Choice, 17–33 (1971)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Dobzinski, S., Nisan, N., Schapira, M.: Approximation Algorithms for Combinatorial Auctions with Complement-Free Bidders. In: Proc. of STOC (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ferrante, A., Parlato, G., Sorrentino, F., Ventre, C.: Improvements for truthful mechanisms with verifiable one-parameter selfish agents. In: Erlebach, T., Persinao, G. (eds.) WAOA 2005. LNCS, vol. 3879, pp. 147–160. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Groves, T.: Incentive in Teams. Econometrica 41, 617–631 (1973)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Gui, H., Müller, R., Vohra, R.V.: Dominant strategy mechanisms with multidimensional types. Technical report (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Lavi, R., Mu’Alem, A., Nisan, N.: Towards a characterization of truthful combinatorial auctions. In: Proc. of FOCS (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lehmann, D., O’Callaghan, L., Shoham, Y.: Truth revelation in approximately efficient combinatorial auctions. Journal of the ACM 49(5), 577–602 (2002)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Malakhov, A., Vohra, R.V.: Single and multi-dimensional optimal auctions - a network approach. Technical report (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Mu’Alem, A., Nisan, N.: Truthful approximation mechanisms for restricted combinatorial auctions. In: Proc. of AAAI (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Myerson, R.: Optimal auction design. Mathematics of Operations Research 6, 58–73 (1981)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Nisan, N., Ronen, A.: Algorithmic Mechanism Design. In: Proc. of STOC (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Nisan, N., Ronen, A.: Computationally feasible VCG mechanisms. In: Proc. of EC (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Roberts, K.: The Characterization of Implementable Choice Rule. In: Laffont, J.J. (ed.) Aggregation and Revelation of Preferences (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Rochet, J.-C.: A condition for rationalizability in a quasi-linear context. Journal of Mathematical Economics 16, 191–200 (1987)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  23. Saks, M., Yu, L.: Weak monotonicity suffices for truthfulness on convex domains. In: Proc. of EC (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Ventre, C.: Mechanisms with verification for any finite domain. Technical report (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Vickrey, W.: Counterspeculation, Auctions and Competitive Sealed Tenders. Journal of Finance, 8–37 (1961)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Ventre, C. (2006). Mechanisms with Verification for Any Finite Domain. In: Spirakis, P., Mavronicolas, M., Kontogiannis, S. (eds) Internet and Network Economics. WINE 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4286. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11944874_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11944874_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-68138-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-68141-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics