Skip to main content

Autonomy Without Independence: Animal Training as a Model for Robot Design

  • Conference paper
  • 390 Accesses

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 3825))

Abstract

A classic autonomous robot is an autonomous agent for open, unpredictable environments. Such an agent is inherently autonomous but not independent. Independence implies unpredictability, which is incompatible with agency. The current robot models – behavior based and artificial intelligence – have not been effective at implementing the classic autonomous robot model due to limitations in their definitions. The artificial intelligence model cannot deal with unpredictable environments, and neither model directly includes the concept of agency. Animal training as a model for robotics has the potential to avoid these problems. Animal training has several advantages. It has an inherent model of agency. Goals and behavior are formally separated into human goals and animal behavior. The animal is autonomous, requiring conversation between human and animal, but it is not an independent entity. A robot designed using this model is an articulate machine, programmed as an agent for the user.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Wyland, D.C.: Reasonable Machines: Analogical Reasoning in Autonomous Agent Design. In: Truszkowski, W., Hinchey, M., Rouff, C.A. (eds.) WRAC 2002. LNCS, vol. 2564. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Weiner, N.: Cybernetics, 2nd edn. MIT Press, Cambridge (1948)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Brooks, R.A.: Brooks, Intelligence Without Representation. Artificial Intelligence Journal (47) (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ford, K.M., Pylyshyn, Z.W.: The Robot’s Dilemma Revisited. Ablex Publishing Company, Greenwich (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Newel, A., Shaw, J.C., Simon, H.: A General Problem Solving Program for a Computer. Computers and Automation 8(7), 10–16 (1959)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Newel, A., Shaw, J.C., Simon, H.: Empirical Explorations with the Logic Theory Machine. In: Proc. Western Joint Computer conference, vol. 15, pp. 218–329 (1957)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Brooks, R.A.: Intelligence without Reason. In: Proceedings of the 1991 International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 569–595 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Pollock, J.: Planning Agents. In: Rao, Wooldridge (eds.), Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (1999) ISBN: 0792356012

    Google Scholar 

  9. Fikes, R.E., Nilsson, N.J.: STRIPS: a new approach to the application of theorem proving to problem solving. Artificial Intelligence 2, 189–208

    Google Scholar 

  10. Arkin, R.C.: Behavior Based Robotics. MIT Press, Cambridge (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Grey Walter, W.: The Living Brain. W. W. Norton, New York (1963)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Brooks, R.A.: A Robust Layered Control System for a Mobile Robot. IEEE Journal of Robotics and Automation RA-2, 14–23 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Agre, P., Chapman, D.: What are Plans For? In: Maes, P. (ed.) Designing Autonomous Agents. MIT Press, Cambridge (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Lowe, D.G.: Distinctive Image Features from Scale-Invariant Keypoints. International Journal of Computer Vision 60(2), 91–110 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Lowe, D.G.: Object Recognition from Local Scale-Invariant Features. International Journal of Computer Vision, Corfu, Greece, 1150–1157 (September 1999)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Se, S., Lowe, D., Little, J.: Local and Global Localization for Mobile Robots Using Visual Landmarks. In: IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, IROS 2001, Maui, Hawaii, October 2001, pp. 414–420 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  17. James Firby, R.: Adaptive Execution in Complex Dynamic Domains. Ph.D. Thesis, Yale University Technical Report YALEU/CSD/RR #672 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Suereth, R.: Developing Natural Language Interfaces. McGraw-Hill, New York (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Payton, D.W.: Internalized Plans: A Representation for Action Resources. In: Maes, P. (ed.) Designing Autonomous Agents, MIT Press, Cambridge (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Hammond, J.: Case-Based Planning: A Framework for Planning from Experience. Cognitive Science 14, 385–443 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Wyland, D.C. (2006). Autonomy Without Independence: Animal Training as a Model for Robot Design. In: Hinchey, M.G., Rago, P., Rash, J.L., Rouff, C.A., Sterritt, R., Truszkowski, W. (eds) Innovative Concepts for Autonomic and Agent-Based Systems. WRAC 2005. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 3825. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11964995_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11964995_14

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-69265-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-69266-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics