Skip to main content

Non-existence of program optimizers in an abstract setting

  • Theorie De La Programmation Theory Of Programming
  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Programming Symposium

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 19))

  • 2067 Accesses

This research has been supported by National Science Foundation grant GJ-33168.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  1. Alton, D. A., Diversity of speedups and embeddability in computational complexity, Tech. Rep. 73-01, Dept. of Computer Science, Univ. of Iowa, available as Report NSF-OCA-GJ-33168-01 (accession no. PB-221089) from National Technical Information Service, U.S. Dept. of Commerce, Springfield, Va. 22151, to appear in shorter version, J. of Symbolic Logic.

    Google Scholar 

  2. —, Non-existence of program optimizers in an abstract setting, Tech. Rep. 73-08, Dept. of Computer Science, Univ. of Iowa, available as Report NSF-OCA-GJ-33168-02 (accession number PB-226 464/AS) from National Technical Information Service, U.S. Dept. of Commerce, Springfield, Va. 22151.

    Google Scholar 

  3. —, revision of [2], to appear, J. Comput. System Sci.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Blum, M., A machine-independent theory of the complexity of recursive functions, J. Assoc. Comput. Mach. 14, 322–336 (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  5. —, On effective procedures for speeding up algorithms, J. Assoc. Comput. Mach. 18, 290–305 (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cobham, A., The intrinsic computational difficulty of functions, in Logic, Methodology, and Philosophy of Science (Proc. 1964 Internat. Conf., ed. Bar-Hillel, North Holland, 1965), 24–30.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Constable, R., Two types of hierarchy theorems for axiomatic complexity classes, in Computational Complexity (Courant Comp. Sci. Symp. 7, ed. Rustin, Algorithmics Press, New York, 1973), 37–63.

    Google Scholar 

  8. — and Borodin, A., Subrecursive programming languages 1: efficiency and program structure, J. Assoc. Comput. Mach. 19, 526–568 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Cook, S., and Reckhow, R., Time bounded random access machines, J. Comput. System Sci. 7, 354–375 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Grzegorczyk, A., Some classes of recursive functions, Rozprawy Mat. 4 (1953).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hartmanis, J., Computational complexity of random access stored program machines, Math. Systems Theory 5, 232–245 (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  12. — and Hopcroft, J., An overview of the theory of computational complexity, J. Assoc. Comput. Mach. 18, 444–475 (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lowther, J., The existence and non-existence of optimizers for subrecursive programming languages, Ph.D. dissertation, The University of Iowa, in preparation.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ritchie, R., Classes of predictably computable functions, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 106, 139–173 (1963).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Rogers, R., Theory of recursive functions and effective computability, McGraw-Hill, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

B. Robinet

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1974 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Alton, D.A., Lowther, J.L. (1974). Non-existence of program optimizers in an abstract setting. In: Robinet, B. (eds) Programming Symposium. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 19. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-06859-7_138

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-06859-7_138

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-06859-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-37819-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics