Skip to main content

Supporting flexible and efficient tool integration

  • Tool Integration
  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 244))

Abstract

We present a model of tool integration intermediate to the monolithic approach and the toolkit approach. Tools are developed separately, as in the toolkit approach, and then combined to form a new tool. The Interface Description Language (IDL), a notation for describing the characteristics of data structures passed among collections of cooperating processes, is extended to specify tight integration as exhibited in the monolithic approach. A composite tool can be formed by grouping a collection of existing tools linked through connections. Representations for connections that differ in flexibility and efficiency can be specified. Certain portions of the tool can be generated automatically from its specification.

This author was supported in part by an IBM Faculty Development Award.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Reference Manual for the Ada Programming Language. (ANSI/MIL-STD-1815A) ed. United States Department of Defense, Washington, D.C., 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Aho, A.V., R. Sethi and J.D. Ullman. Compilers: Principles, Techniques and Tools. Reading, Massachusetts: Addison Wesley, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ambler, A. and R. Trawick. Chatin's Graph Coloring Algorithm as a Method for Assigning Positions to Diana Attributes. ACM SIGPlan Notices, 18, No. 2, Feb. 1983, pp. 37–78.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Borison, E. A Model of Software Manufacture. in Proceedings of the International Workshop on Advanced Programming Environments, IFIP WG 2.4. Trondheim, Norway: June 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Butler, K.J. DIANA Past, Present, and Future. in Lecture Notes in Computer Science Ada Software Tools Interfaces, Ed. G. Goos and J. Hartmanis. Workshop, Bath: Springer-Verlag, 1983, pp. 3–22.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Butler, N., J. Curry, S. Konstant and D. Rosenblum. Treepr Users Manual. SoftLab Document No. 4. Computer Science Department, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. May 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Conradi, R. and D.H. Wanvik. Mechanisms and Tools for Separate Compilation. Technical Report 25/85. The University of Trondheim, The Norwegian Institute of Technology. October 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  8. DeRemer, F. and H.H. Kron. Programming-in-the-Large vs. Programming-in-the-Small. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, SE-2, No. 2, June 1976, pp. 80–86.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Deitel, H.M. An Introduction to Operating Systems. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gilman, A.S. VHDL—The Designer Environment. IEEE Design and Test,, Apr. 1986, pp. 42–47.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Goos, G., W.A. Wulf, A. Evans and Butler. K.J..DIANA An Intermediate Language for Ada. Vol. 161 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer-Verlag, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Habermann, A.N. Tools for Software System Construction, in Software Development Tools. Pingree Park, Co: Springer-Verlag, 1979. pp. 10–21.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Joy, W. An Introduction to the C Shell. Dept. of EE and Computer Science, UCB, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kaplan, S.M., R.H. Campbell, M.T. Harandi, R.E. Johnson, S.N. Kamin, J.W.S. Liu and J.M. Purtilo. An Architecture for Tool Integration. in Proceedings of the International Workshop on Advanced Programming Environments, IFIP WG 2.4. Trondheim, Norway: June 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kernighan, B.W. and D.M. Ritchie. The C Programming Language. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kernighan, B.W. and J.R. Mashey. The Unix Programming Environment. Computer, 14, No. 4, Apr. 1981, pp. 12–24.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kickenson, J.S. An IDL Assertion Checker. Computer Science Department, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Aug. 1986. SoftLab Document No. 28.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lamb, D.A. Sharing Intermediate Representations: The Interface Description Language. Ph.D. Diss. Computer Science Department, Carnegie-Mellon University, May 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Luckham, D.C. and F.W. von Henke. An Overview of Anna, a Specification Language for Ada. in Proceedings of the IEEE Computer Society 1984 Conference on Ada Applications and Environments, St. Paul, MN: Oct. 1984, pp. 116–127.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Mitchell, J.G., W. Maybury and R. Sweet. Mesa Language Manual Version 5.0. Technical Report CSL-79-3. Xerox PARC. Apr. 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Nestor, J.R., W.A. Wulf and D.A. Lamb. IDL Formal Description, Draft Revision 2.0. Technical Report. Computer Science Department, Carnegie-Mellon University. June 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Nestor, J.R. Revised Process Model for IDL. 1986. (Informal presentation, SEI-UNC Workshop on IDL, Kiawah Island, SC.)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Newcomer, J.M. IDL: Future Directions. in Proceedings of the International Workshop on Advanced Programming Environments, IFIP WG 2.4. Trondheim, Norway: June 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Notkin, D. The GANDALF Project. Journal of Systems and Software, 5, No. 2, May 1985, pp. 91–106.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Osterweil, L. and G. Clemm. The Toolpack/IST Approach To Extensibility In Software Environments. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science Ada Software Tools Interfaces, Ed. G. Goos and J. Hartmanis. Workshop, Bath: Springer-Verlag, 1983, pp. 133–163.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Purtilo, J. Polylith: An Environment to Support Management of Tool Interfaces. in Proceedings of the ACM SIGPlan '85 Symposium on Language Issues in Programming Environments, Seattle, WA: July 1985, pp. 12–18.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Reiss, S.P. PECAN: Program Development Systems that Support Multiple Views. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, SE-11, No. 3, Mar. 1985, pp. 276–285.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Reps, T. and T. Teitelbaum. The Synthesizer Generator. in Proceedings of the ACM SIGSOFT/SIGPLAN Software Engineering Symposium on Practical Software Development Environments, Ed. P. Henderson. Association for Computing Machinery. Pittsburgh, PA: ACM, May 1984, pp. 42–48.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Rudmik, A. and B.G. Moore. An Efficient Separate Compilation Strategy for Very Large Programs. in Proceedings of the Symposium on Compiler Construction, Boston, MA: June 1982, pp. 301–307.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Shannon, K. and R. Snodgrass. Listers Users Manual. SoftLab Document No. 11. Computer Science Department, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. Sep. 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Shannon, K., T. Maroney and R. Snodgrass. Using IDL with C. SoftLab Document No. 6. Computer Science Department, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. May 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Shannon, K. and R. Snodgrass. Candle: Common Attributed Notation for Interface Description. SoftLab Document No. 26. Computer Science Department, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. Jan. 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Shannon, K. and R. Snodgrass. Mapping the Interface Description Language Type Model into C. SoftLab Document No. 24. Computer Science Department, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. Mar. 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Snodgrass, R., editor IDL Manual Entries (Version 2.0). SoftLab Document No. 15. Computer Science Department, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. Dec. 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Teitelbaum, T., T. Reps and S. Horwitz. The Why and Wherefore of the Cornell Program Synthesizer. in Proceedings of the ACM SigPlan SigOA Symposium on Text Manipulation, Association for Computing Machinery. Portland, OR: acm, june 1981, pp. 8–16.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Tichy, W.F. Software Development Control Based on Module Interconnection. in Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Software Engineering, Munich, West Germany: Sep. 1979, pp. 29–41.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Tichy, W.F. and M.C. Baker. Smart Recompilation. in Proceedings of the 1985 Conference on Principles of Programming Languages, Association for Computing Machinery. Jan. 1985, pp. 236–244.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Warren, W.B., J. Kickenson and R. Snodgrass. A Tutorial Introduction to Using IDL. Softlab Document No. 1. Computer Science Department, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. Dec. 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Wirth, N. Programming in Modula-2, 2nd Edition. of Texts and Monographs in Computer Science. Springer-Verlag, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Wolf, A.L., L.A. Clarke and J.C. Wileden. An Ada Environment for Programming-In-The-Large. in Proceedings of the IEEE Computer Society 1984 Conference on Ada Applications and Environments, St. Paul, MN: Oct. 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Zorn, B. Experiences with Ada Code Generation. Technical Report UCB/CSD 85/249. University of California, Berkeley. June 1985.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Reidar Conradi Tor M. Didriksen Dag H. Wanvik

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1987 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Snodgrass, R., Shannon, K. (1987). Supporting flexible and efficient tool integration. In: Conradi, R., Didriksen, T.M., Wanvik, D.H. (eds) Advanced Programming Environments. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 244. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-17189-4_104

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-17189-4_104

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-17189-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-47347-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics