Skip to main content

Registration of Remote Sensing Image with Measurement Errors and Error Propagation

  • Conference paper
  • 1657 Accesses

Abstract

Reference control points (RCPs) used to establish the regression model in registration or geometric correction are commonly assumed “perfect”. However, this assumption is often violated in practice due to RCPs actually always containing errors. Moreover, the errors in RCPs are one of main sources lowering the accuracy of geometric correction of uncorrected image. In this case Ordinary least squares (OLS) estimator, widely used in geometric correction of remotely sensed data, is biased and does not have the ability to handle explanatory variables with error and to propagate appropriately errors from RCPs to the corrected image. In this paper, we introduce the consistent adjusted least squares (CALS) estimator and propose a relaxed consistent adjusted least squares (RCALS) method, which can be applied to more general relationship, for geometric correction or registration. These estimators have good capability in correcting errors contained in the RCPs, and to propagate correctly errors of the RCPs to the corrected image with and without prior information. The objective of the CALS and our proposed RCALS estimators is to improve the accuracy of measurement value by weakening the measurement errors. For validating CALS and RCALS estimators, we employ the CALS and RCALS estimators using real-life remotely sensed data. It has been argued and demon-strated that CALS and RCALS estimators give superior overall performances in estimating the regression coefficients and variance of measurement error.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Buiten, H. J., 1988, Matching and mapping of remote sensing images: aspects of methodology and quality. Proceedings of 16th ISPRS congress, Kyoto, Japan, 27-B10 (III), pp. 321–330.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Buiten, H. J.; Clevers, J. G. P. W., 1993, Land observation by remote sensing: theory and applications, Gordon and Breach Science Publisher, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Carmel, Y.; Dean, D. J.; Flather, C. H., 2001, Combing location and classification error sources for estimating multi-temporal database accuracy, Photogrammetic Engineering and Remote Sensing, Vol. 67(7), pp. 865–872.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Congalton, R. G.; Green, K., 1999, Assessing the Accuracy of Remotely Sensed Data: Principle and Practices, Lewis Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dai, X. L.; Khorram, S., 1998, The effects of image misregistration on the accuracy of remotely sensed change detection. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, Vol. 36(5), pp.1566–1577.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Flusser, J.; Suk, T., 1994, A moment-based approach to registration of images with affine geometric distortion, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, Vol. 32(2), pp.382–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Janssen, L. L. F.; Van der Wel, F. J. M., 1994, Accuracy Assessment of Satellite Derived Land-Cover Data: A Review, Photogrammetic Engineering and Remote Sensing, Vol. 60(4), pp.419–426.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Jensen, J. R., 1996, Introductory digital image processing: a remote sensing perspective, Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kapteyn, A.; Wansbeek, T.J., 1984, Errors in variables: Consistent Adjusted Least Squares (CALS) estimator. Communication in Statistics —Theory and Methods, 13, 1811–1837.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lunetta, R. S.; Congalton, R. G.; Fenstermaker, L. K., et al., 1991, Remote Sensing and Geographic In formation System Data Integration: Error Sources and Research Issues, Photogrammetic Engineering and Remote Sensing, 57(6): 677–687.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Moreno, J. F.; Melia, J., 1993, A method for accurate geometric correction of NOAA AVHRR HRPT data, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, Vol. 31(1), pp.204–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Richards, J. A.; Jia, X. P., 1999, Remote sensing digital image analysis: an introduction, Berlin; New York: Springer-Verlag, 3rd

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Ge, Y., Leung, Y., Ma, J., Wang, J. (2005). Registration of Remote Sensing Image with Measurement Errors and Error Propagation. In: Developments in Spatial Data Handling. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-26772-7_22

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics