Abstract
Route planners are tools that support the navigator in selecting the best route between two locations. Solving a route choice problem involves sorting and ranking of alternatives according to underlying evaluation criteria and decision rules. Using an appropriate classification of route selection criteria in the user interface is an important ingredient for user friendly route planners. The paper presents a method for assessing a hierarchical structure of route selection criteria for bicycle route planning tasks along with data from two empirical studies. The first study investigates route selection criteria that are relevant for bicycle navigation in urban environments. The second study reveals preferred classification schemata for these criteria. The presented methodology can be adopted for other transportation domains, such as car or pedestrian navigation.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Bibliography
Backhaus K, Erichson B, Plinke W, Weiber R (1996) Multivariate Analysemethoden. Berlin, Springer
Bovy PHL, Stern E (1990) Route choice: Wayfinding in transport networks. Dordrecht, Kluwer Academic
Ehlers M, Jung S, Stroemer K (2002) Design and Implementation of a GIS Based Bicycle Routing System for the World Wide Web (WWW). Spatial Data Handling 2002, Ottawa
Golledge RG (1997) Defining the Criteria Used in Path Selection. In: Ettema DF, Timmermans HJP (eds) Activity-Based Approaches to Travel Analysis. Elsevier, New York, pp 151–169
Hartigan JA (1975) Clustering algorithms. New York, John Wiley & Sons
Hochmair H (2004) Decision support for bicycle route planning in urban environments. In: Proceedings of the 7th AG ILE Conference on Geographic Information Science. Crete University Press, Heraklion, Greece, pp 697–706
Hyodo T, Suzuki N, Takahashi K (2000) Modeling of Bicycle Route and Destination Choice Behavior for Bicycle Road Network Plan. Annual Meeting of Transportation Research Board
Keeny RL, Raiffa H (1993) Decision Making with Multiple Objectives: Prefeences and Value Tradeoffs. Cambridge, UK, Cambridge University Press
MAGWIEN (2004) Magistrat Wien: Routensuche für Radfahrer. http://www.wien.gv.at/stadtentwicklung/radwege [accessed 08/04/2004]
Malczewski J (1999) GIS and Multicriteria Decision Analysis. New York, John Wiley
Miller GA (1956) The magical number seven, plus minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological review 63: 81–97
Morris A, Jankowski P (2000) Combining fuzzy sets and fuzzy object oriented spatial databases in multiple criteria spatial decision making. Flexible Query Answering Systems: Recent Advances: 103–116
MVEL (2004) Ministerium für Verkehr, Energie und Landesplanung NRW: Radroutenplaner NRW. http://www.radroutenplaner.nrw.de [accessed 08/04/2004]
Rad.RoutenPlaner (2003) Software CD ROM. http://www.tvg-software.de [accessed 08/04/2004]
Robinson VB (1990) Interactive Machine Acquisition of a Fuzzy Spatial Relation. Computers and Geosciences 16(6): 857–872
Rosch E (1978) Principles of categorization. In: Rosch E, Lloyd BB (eds) Cognition and categorization. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp 27–48
Srinivasan V (1988) A Conjunctive-Compensatory Approach to the Self-Explication of Multiattributed Preferences. Decision Sciences 19: 295–305
Tversky A (1977) Features of Similarity. Psychological Review 84(4): 327–352
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Hochmair, H. (2005). Towards a Classification of Route Selection Criteria for Route Planning Tools. In: Developments in Spatial Data Handling. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-26772-7_37
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-26772-7_37
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-22610-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-26772-0
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)