Skip to main content

Comparing and Combining Different Expert Relations of How Land Cover Ontologies Relate

  • Conference paper
Book cover Developments in Spatial Data Handling

Abstract

Expressions of expert opinion are being used to relate ontologically diverse data and to identify logical inconsistency them. Relations constructed under different scenarios, from different experts and evidence combined in different ways identify different subsets of inconsistency, the reliability of which can be parameterised by field validation. It is difficult to identify one combination as being objectively “better” than other. The selection of specific experts and scenarios depends on user perspectives.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bishr, Y., 1998. Overcoming the semantic and other barriers to GIS interoperability. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 12(4), 299–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Comber, A. Fisher, P., and Wadsworth, R. (in press a). Integrating land cover data with different ontologies: identifying change from inconsistency. International Journal of Geographic Information Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Comber, AJ, Fisher, PF, Wadsworth, RA., (in press b). Assessment of a Semantic Statistical Approach to Detecting Land Cover Change Using Inconsistent Data Sets. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Comber, A. Fisher, P. and Wadsworth, R., 2003a. Actor Network Theory: a suitable framework to understand how land cover mapping projects develop? Land Use Policy, 20, 299–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Comber, A.J., Fisher, P.F and Wadsworth, R.A, 2003b. A semantic statistical approach for identifying change from ontologically divers land cover data. In AGILE 2003, 5th AGILE conference on Geographic Information Science, edited by Michael Gould, Robert Laurini, Stephane Coulondre (Lausanne: PPUR), pp. 123–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Comber, AJ, Fisher, PF, Wadsworth, RA., 2003c. Identifying Land Cover Change Using a Semantic Statistical Approach: First Results. In cd Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on GeoComputation, 8th–10th September 2003 (University of Southampton).

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank, A.U. 2001. Tiers of ontology and consistency constraints in geographical information systems, International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 15(7), 667–678.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, R.M., Smith, G.M., and Devereux, B.J. (2003). The characterisation and measurement of land cover change through remote sensing: problems in operational applications? International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 4, 243–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, R.M., G.B., Groom, A.R. Jones, 1994. The Land Cover Map of Great Britain: an automated classification of Landsat Thematic Mapper data. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 60, 553–562.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, R.M., Smith, G.M., Sanderson, J.M., Hill, R.A. and Thomson, A.G., 2002. Land Cover Map 2000: construction of a parcel-based vector map from satellite images. Cartographic Journal, 39, 15–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guarino, N, 1995. Formal ontology, conceptual analysis and knowledge representation. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 43, 625–640.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, F., Kuhn, W., Pundt, H., Bishr, Y. and Riedemann, C.,, 1999. Semantic interoperability: A central issue for sharing geographic information. Annals of Regional Science 33(2), 213–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herring J.R., 1999. The OpenGIS data model. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 65(5), 585–588.

    Google Scholar 

  • OGC, 2003. OpenGIS Consortium. http://www.opengis.org/ (last date accessed: 10 June 2003).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pundt, H. and Y. Bishr, 2002. Domain ontologies for data sharing-an example from environmental monitoring using field GIS. Computers and Geosciences, 28(1), 95–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, G.M. and R.M. Fuller, 2002. Land Cover Map 2000 and meta-data at the land parcel level, In Uncertainty in Remote Sensing and GIS, edited by G.M. Foody and P.M. Atkinson (London: John Wiley and Sons), pp 143–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Visser, U., Stuckenschmidt, H., Schuster, G. and Vogele, T., 2002. Ontologies for geographic information processing. Computers and Geosciences, 28, 103–117.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Comber, A., Fisher, P., Wadsworth, R. (2005). Comparing and Combining Different Expert Relations of How Land Cover Ontologies Relate. In: Developments in Spatial Data Handling. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-26772-7_43

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics