Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Web Usability: Principles and Evaluation Methods

  • Chapter
Book cover Web Engineering

Abstract

Current Web applications are very complex and highly sophisticated software products, whose usability can greatly determine their success or failure. Defining methods for ensuring usability is one of the current goals of Web engineering research. Also, much attention is currently paid to usability by industry, recognising the importance of adopting methods for usability evaluation before and after application deployment. This chapter introduces principles and evaluation methods to be adopted during the whole application lifecycle for promoting usability. For each evaluation method, the main features, as well as the emerging advantages and drawbacks, are illustrated so as to support the choice of an evaluation plan that best fits the goals to be pursued and the available resources. The design and evaluation of a real application is also described for exemplifying the concepts and methods introduced.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Agrawal R, Imielinski T, Swami A. (1993) Mining Association Rules Between Sets of Items in Large Databases. In: Proceedings of ACM-SIGMOD 93, Washington, DC, May, pp 207–216

    Google Scholar 

  2. Analog. (2005) http://www.analog.cx. (accessed on 18th January 2005)

    Google Scholar 

  3. A-Prompt Project. (2005) http://aprompt.snow.utoronto.ca/ (accessed 18 January 2005)

    Google Scholar 

  4. AWSD-WebLog. (2005) http://awsd.com/scripts/weblog/index.shtml (accessed 18 January 2005)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Baresi L, Garzotto F, Paolini P (2001) Extending UML for Modeling Web Applications. In: Proceedings of the 34th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Maui, USA, January

    Google Scholar 

  6. Berendt B, Hotho A, Stumme G (2002) Towards Semantic Web Mining. In: Proceedings of the 1st International Semantic Web Conference, Sardinia, Italy, June. Springer, Berlin, LNCC. 2342, pp 264–278

    Google Scholar 

  7. Berendt B, Spiliopoulou M (2000) Analysis of Navigation Behaviour in Web Sites Integrating Multiple Information Systems. J Very Large Data Bases, 9(1):56–75

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bias RG, Mayhew DJ (1994) Cost-justifying usability. Academic Press, Boston, MA

    Google Scholar 

  9. Blackmon MH, Polson PG, Kitajima M, Lewis C (2002) Cognitive Walkthrough for the Web. In: Proceedings of the 2002 International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Minneapolis, USA, April, pp 463–470

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bobby. (2005) http://bobby.watchfire.com/bobby/html/en/index.jsp (accessed 18 January 2005)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Brajnik G (2004) Using Automatic Tools in Accessibility and Usability Assurance. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Workshop on User Interface for All, Vienna. June, Springer, Berlin, LNCC 3196, pp 219–234

    Google Scholar 

  12. Brooks P (1994) Adding Value to Usability Testing. In: Nielsen J, Mack RL (eds) Usability Inspection Methods. Wiley, New York, pp 255–271

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ceri S, Fraternali, P (2003) Architectural Issues and Solutions in the Development of Data-Intensive Web Applications. In: Proceedings of the First Biennial Conference on Innovative Data Systems Research, Asilomar, USA, January

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ceri S, Fraternali P, Bongio A, Brambilla M, Comai S, Matera M (2003) Designing Data-Intensive Web Applications, Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, CA

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ceri S, Fraternali P, Matera M (2002) Conceptual Modeling of Data-Intensive Web Applications. IEEE Internet Computing, 6(4):20–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Conallen J (2002) Building Web Applications with UML, Addison-Wesley, Boston, MA

    Google Scholar 

  17. Cooley R (2003) The Use of Web Structures and Content to Identify Subjectively Interesting Web Usage Patterns. ACM Transactions on Internet Technology 3(2):93–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Cooley R, Mobasher B, Srivastava J (1999) Data Preparation for Mining World Wide Web Browsing Patterns. J Knowledge and Information Systems, 1(1):5–32

    Google Scholar 

  19. Cooley R, Tan P, Srivastava J (2000) Discovery of Interesting Usage Patterns from Web Data. In: Proceedings of the 1999 International Workshop on Web Usage Analysis and User Profiling, San Diego, USA, August. Springer, Berlin, LNCC 1836, pp 163–182

    Google Scholar 

  20. Dix A, Finlay J, Abowd G, Beale R (1998) Human-Computer Interaction, 2nd edn. Prentice Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  21. Doubleday A, Ryan M, Springett M, Sutcliffe A (1997) A Comparison of Usability Techniques for Evaluating Design. In: Proceedings of the 1999 Symposium on Designing Interactive Systems: Processes, Practices, Methods and Techniques, Amsterdam, the Netherlands, August, pp 101–110

    Google Scholar 

  22. Eirinaki M, Vazirgiannis M (2003) Web Mining for Web Personalization. J ACM Transactions on Internet Technology, 3(1):1–27

    Google Scholar 

  23. Fraternali P, Lanzi PL, Matera M, Maurino A (2004) A Model-Driven Web Usage Analysis for the Evaluation of Web Application Quality. Web Engineering, 3(2):124–152

    Google Scholar 

  24. Fraternali P, Matera M, Maurino A (2002) WQA: An XSL Framework for Analyzing the Quality of Web Applications. In: Proceedings of the Second International Workshop on Web-Oriented Software Technologies, Malaga, Spain, June

    Google Scholar 

  25. Garzotto F, Matera M (1997) A Systematic Method for Hypermedia Usability Inspection. New Review of Hypermedia and Multimedia, 6(3):39–65

    Google Scholar 

  26. Hull L (2004) Accessibility: It’s Not Just for Disabilities Any More. ACM Interactions, 41(2):36–41

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  27. Hutchins EL, Hollan JD, Norman DA (1985) Direct manipulation interfaces. Human-Computer Interaction, 1:311–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. IBM (2005) Ease of Use guidelines. http://www-306.ibm.com/ibm/easy/eou_ext.nsf/publish/558 (2005). (accessed 18 January 2005)

    Google Scholar 

  29. ISO (1997) ISO 9241: Ergonomics Requirements for Office Work with Visual Display Terminal (VDT) Parts 1–17

    Google Scholar 

  30. Ivory MY, Hearst MA (2001) The State of the Art in Automating Usability Evaluation of User Interfaces. ACM Computing Surveys, 33(4):470–516

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Ivory MY, Sinha RR, Hearst MA (2001) Empirically Validated Web Page Design Metrics. In: Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Seattle, USA, April, pp 53–60

    Google Scholar 

  32. Jeffries R, Desurvire HW (1992) Usability Testing vs. Heuristic Evaluation: Was There a Context? ACM SIGCHI Bulletin, 24(4):39–41

    Google Scholar 

  33. Jeffries R, Miller J, Wharton C, Uyeda KM (1991) User Interface Evaluation in the Real Word: A Comparison of Four Techniques. In: Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, New Orleans, USA, pp 119–124

    Google Scholar 

  34. Kantner L, Rosenbaum S (1997) Usability Studies of WWW Sites: Heuristic Evaluation vs. Laboratory Testing. In: Proceedings of the ACM 1997 International Conference on Computer Documentation, Snowbird, USA, pp 153–160

    Google Scholar 

  35. Lewis JR (1995) IBM Computer Usability Satisfaction Questionnaires: Psychometric Evaluation and Instruction for Use. Human-Computer Interaction, 7(1):57–78

    Google Scholar 

  36. LIFT. (2005) http://www.usablenet.com (accessed 18 January 2005)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Lim KH, Benbasat I, Todd PA (1996) An Experimental Investigation of the Interactive Effects of Interface Style, Instructions, and Task Familiarity on User Performance. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 3(1):1–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Lowe D (2003) Emerging knowledge in Web Development. In Aurum A, Jeffery R, Wohlin C, Handzic M (eds) Managing Software Engineering Knowledge. Springer, Berlin, pp 157–175

    Google Scholar 

  39. Lynch P, Horton S (2001) Web Style Guide: Basic Design Principles for Creating Web Sites, 2nd edn. Yale University Press, New Heaven, CT

    Google Scholar 

  40. Madsen KH (1999) Special Issue on The Diversity of Usability Practices. J Communications of the ACM, 42(5)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Marchionini G, Shneiderman B (1988) Finding Facts vs. Browsing Knowledge in Hypertext Systems. IEEE Computer, 21(1):70–80

    Google Scholar 

  42. Meo R, Lanzi PL, Matera M, Esposito R (2004) Integrating Web Conceptual Modeling and Web Usage Mining. In: Proceedings of the 2002 International ACM Workshop on Web Mining and Web Usage Analysis, Seattle, USA, August

    Google Scholar 

  43. Molich R, Nielsen J (1990) Improving a Human-Computer Dialogue. Communications of the ACM, 33(3):338–348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Nielsen J (1992) The Usability Engineering Lifecycle. J IEEE Computer, 25(3):12–22

    Google Scholar 

  45. Nielsen J (1993) Usability Engineering. Academic Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  46. Nielsen J (1994) Special Issue on Usability Laboratories. Behavior and Information Technology, 13(1)

    Google Scholar 

  47. Nielsen J (1994) Guerrilla HCI: Using Discount Usability Engineering to Penetrate Intimidation Barrier. In: Proceedings of the Cost-Justifying Usability, Academic Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  48. Nielsen J (1995) Multimedia and Hypertext Internet and Beyond, Academic Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  49. Nielsen J (2000) Web Usability. New Riders, New York

    Google Scholar 

  50. Nielsen J, Landauer TK (1993) A Mathematical Model of the Finding of Usability Problems. In: Proceedings of the ACM 1993 International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Amsterdam, Netherlands, April, pp 296–213

    Google Scholar 

  51. Nielsen J, Mack RL (1994) Usability Inspection Methods. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  52. Nielsen J, Molich R (1990) Heuristic Evaluation of User Interfaces. In: Proceedings of the ACM 1990 International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Seattle, USA, April, pp 249–256

    Google Scholar 

  53. Norman DA (1991) Cognitive Artifacts. In: Proceedings of the Designing Interaction: Psychology at the Human-Computer Interface. Cambridge University. New York, pp. 17–38

    Google Scholar 

  54. Polson P, Lewis C, Rieman J, Wharton C (1992) Cognitive Walkthrough: A Method for Theory-based Evaluation of User Interfaces. Man-Machine Studies, 36:741–773

    Google Scholar 

  55. Preece J, Rogers Y, Sharp H, Benyon D, Holland S, Carey T (1994) Human-Computer Interaction. Addison-Wesley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  56. Punin JR, Krishnamoorthy MS, Zaki MJ (2002) LOGML: Log Markup Language for Web Usage Mining. In: Proceedings of the Third International Workshop on Web Mining and Web Usage Analysis, San Francisco, USA, August, pp 88–112

    Google Scholar 

  57. Schwabe D, Rossi G (1998) An Object Oriented Approach to Web-Based Applications Design. Theory and Practice of Object Ssystems, 4(4):207–225

    Google Scholar 

  58. Shneiderman B (1992) Designing the User Interface. Strategies for Effective Human-Computer Interaction. Addison-Wesley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  59. Shneiderman B (2000) Universal Usability. Communications of the ACM, 43(5):84–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Shneiderman B, Byrd D, Croft WB (1998) Sorting out searching. Communications of the ACM, 41(4):95–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Srivastava J, Cooley R, Deshpande M, Tan PN (2000) Web Usage Mining: Discovery and Applications of Usage Patterns from Web Data. ACM Special Interest Group on Knowledge Discovery in Data Explorations, 1(2):12.23

    Google Scholar 

  62. Stroulia E, Niu N, El-Ramly M (2002) Understanding Web Usage for Dynamic Web-site Adaptation: A Case Study. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Web Site Evolution, Montreal, Canada, October, pp 53–64

    Google Scholar 

  63. Theofanos MF, Redish J (2003) Bridging the gap between accessibility and usability. ACM Interactions, 10(6):36–51

    Google Scholar 

  64. Virzi RA (1992) Refining the Test Phase of Usability Evaluation: How Many Subjects is Enough? Human Factors, 34(4):457–468

    Google Scholar 

  65. WebCriteria SiteProfile. (2005) http://www.coremetrics.com (accessed 18 January 2005)

    Google Scholar 

  66. WebRatio Site Development Studio. (2005) http://www.webratio.com (accessed 18 January 2005)

    Google Scholar 

  67. Wharton C, Rieman J, Lewis C, Polson P (1994) The Cognitive Walkthrough Method: A Practitioner’s Guide. In: Nielsen J, Mack RL (eds) Usability Inspection Methods, Wiley, New York, pp 105–140

    Google Scholar 

  68. Whiteside J, Bennet J, Holtzblatt K (1988) Usability Engineering: Our Experience and Evolution. In: Helander M (ed.) Handbook of Human-Computer Interaction. Elsevier, Amsterdam pp 791–817

    Google Scholar 

  69. Wilson TD (2000) Human Information Behavior. Informing Science, 3(2):49–55

    Google Scholar 

  70. Wurman RS (1997) Information Architects, Watson-Guptill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  71. W3C Consortium — Extended log file format. (2005) http://www.w3.org/TR/WD-logfile.html. (accessed 18 January 2005)

    Google Scholar 

  72. W3C Consortium-WAI-Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0. (2005) W3C-WAI Working Draft. http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20/ (accessed 18 January 2005)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Dipartimento di Elettronica e Informazione, Politecnico di Milano, Via Ponzio 34/5, 20133, Milano, Italy

    Maristella Matera (Assistant Professor)

  2. Human Computer Interaction Laboratory, Politecnico di Milano, Via Ponzio 34/5, 20133, Milano, Italy

    Francesca Rizzo (Dr.)

  3. Dipartimento di Elettronica e Informazione, Politecnico di Milano, Via Giuseppe Ponzio, 34/5, 20133, Milano, Italy

    Giovanni Toffetti Carughi (BEng.)

Authors
  1. Maristella Matera
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Francesca Rizzo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Giovanni Toffetti Carughi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Computer Science Department, University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland, New Zealand

    Emilia Mendes

  2. MetriQ (NZ) Ltd., 19A Clairville Crescent, Wai-O-Taiki Bay, Auckland, New Zealand

    Nile Mosley

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Matera, M., Rizzo, F., Carughi, G.T. (2006). Web Usability: Principles and Evaluation Methods. In: Mendes, E., Mosley, N. (eds) Web Engineering. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-28218-1_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-28218-1_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-28196-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-28218-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation