Skip to main content

Hausman Principal Component Analysis

  • Conference paper

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to obtain discrete-valued weights of the variables by constraining them to Hausman weights (−1, 0, 1) in principal component analysis. And this is done in two steps: First, we start with the centroid method, which produces the most restricted optimal weights −1 and 1; then extend the weights to −1,0 or 1.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   159.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • BURT, C. (1917): The Distribution And Relations Of Educational Abilities. P.S. King & Son: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • CADIMA, J., and JOLLIFFE, I.T. (1995): Loadings and correlations in the interpretation of principal components. Journal of Applied Statistics, 22, 203–214.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • CHIPMAN, H.A., and GU, H. (2003): Interpretable dimension reduction. To appear in Journal of Applied Statistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • CHOULAKIAN, V. (2001): Robust Q-mode principal component analysis in L1. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, 37, 135–150.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • CHOULAKIAN, V. (2003): The optimality of the centroid method. Psychometriks, 68, 473–475.

    Google Scholar 

  • CHOULAKIAN, V. (2005a): Transposition invariant principal component analysis in L1. Statistics and Probability Letters, 71,1, 23–31.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • CHOULAKIAN, V. (2005b): L1-norm projection pursuit principal component analysis. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, in press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hausman, R.E. (1982): Constrained multivariate analysis. Studies in Management Sciences, 19, 137–151.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • JACKSON, J.E. (1991): A User’s Guide To Principal Components. Wiley: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • JOLLIFFE, I.T. (2002): Principal Component Analysis. Springer Verlag: New York, 2nd edition.

    Google Scholar 

  • ROUSSON and GASSER (2004): Simple component analysis. Applied Statistics, 53, 539–556.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • THURSTONE, L.L. (1931): Multiple factor analysis. Psychological Review, 38, 406–427.

    Google Scholar 

  • VINES, S.K. (2000): Simple principal components. Applied Statistics, 49, 441–451.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • WOLD, H. (1966): Estimation of principal components and related models by iterative least squares. In Krishnaiah, P.R., ed.: Multivariate Analysis, Academic Press, N.Y., pp. 391–420.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer Berlin · Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Choulakian, V., Dambra, L., Simonetti, B. (2006). Hausman Principal Component Analysis. In: Spiliopoulou, M., Kruse, R., Borgelt, C., Nürnberger, A., Gaul, W. (eds) From Data and Information Analysis to Knowledge Engineering. Studies in Classification, Data Analysis, and Knowledge Organization. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-31314-1_35

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics