Skip to main content

Comparison of ANN and MARS in Prediction of Property of Steel Strips

  • Conference paper
Applied Soft Computing Technologies: The Challenge of Complexity

Part of the book series: Advances in Soft Computing ((AINSC,volume 34))

Abstract

Soft Computing has become popular in Steel Industry for its applications in the areas of reduction in defects, prediction of properties, classification of the products and many others. In recent times, the prediction of properties of steel strip is an area of increased interest mainly because of its prospective benefits of reduction in testing cost, better control on properties, reduction of inventory, increase in yield, and improvement in delivery compliance. Prediction of mechanical properties is a complicated task, as it depends on the chemical composition of the steel, and a number of processing parameters. In general, a high degree of nonlinearity exists between the property and the factors influencing it. In the past only Artificial Neural Network (ANN) was used, sometimes along with the variable reduction technique such as principle components / factor analysis. However, Multivariate Adaptive Regression Splines (MARS) has never been used despite some of its known advantages over the ANN. In this work two predictive models have been developed - one based on ANN, and another, MARS. This paper discusses on the model development and the comparative performance analysis of these two. The analysis shows that the results from both the models are comparable. However, shorter training time and automatic selection of important predictor variables, give MARS an edge over ANN.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Döll, R., Sorgel, R., Daum, M., and Zouhar, G. (1999), “Control of mechanical properties,” Asia Steel, Crambeth Allen Publishing, Craven Arms, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duarte, B., Saraiva, P. M., and Pantelides, C. C. (2004), “Combined Mechanistic and Empirical Modelling,” International Journal of Chemical Reactor Engineering, vol. 2, pp. 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dumortier, C., Lehert, P., Krupa, P., and Charlier, A. (1998), “Materials Science Forum,” vols. Trans. Tech Publications, Switzerland, pp. 284–393.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dwinnell, W. (2000), “Exploring MARS: An Alternative to Neural Network,”PC AI Magazine

    Google Scholar 

  • Elsilä, U., and Röning, J. (2002), “Knowledge Discovery in Steel Industry Measurements,”Proc of Starting Artificial Intelligence Researchers Symposium (STAIRS), Lyon, France, pp. 197–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, J. H. (1991), “Multivariate Adaptive Regression Splines,” The Annals of Statistics, vol. 19, pp. 1–141.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Guodong, W., Xianghua, L., Cheng, L., Xiumei, W., and Tong, W. (September 26–29,2000), “Application of AI in Rolling and Prediction of Properties of Hot Rolled Materials”, Asia Steel International Conference (Rolling), Beijing, China, pp. 38–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R., Friedman, J. (2001), “The Elements of Statistical Learning: Data Mining, Inference and Prediction,” Springer-Verlag, N.Y, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Invention Intelligence: S&T Magazine, New Delhi, India, (May–June 2004), vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 125–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korczak, P., Dyja, H., and Labuda, E. (1998), “Using Neural Network Models for predicting Mechanical Properties after Hot Plate Roll Process,” Journal of Materials Processing Technology, vol. 80–81, pp. 481–486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mukhopadhyay, A., and Iqbal, A. (2004), “Prediction of Mechanical Properties of Hot Rolled, Low-Carbon Steel Strips using Artificial Neural Network,”Materials and Manufacturing Processes, (2005) vol. 20,no. 5, pp. 739–746

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlang, M., Feldkeller, B., Lang, B., Poppe, T., and Runkler, T. (2003), “Neural Computation in Steel Industry,” European Summer School on Multi-Agent Control, Hamilton Institute, National University of Ireland, Maynooth, Ireland.

    Google Scholar 

  • STATISTICA™ DATA MINER ver 6.1: StatSoft, Inc., Tulsa, OK 74104, USA, (1984–2003).

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, S. M., and Indurkhya, N. (1998), Predictive Data Mining – A Practical Guide, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, Inc., San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer

About this paper

Cite this paper

Mukhopadhyay, A., Iqbal, A. (2006). Comparison of ANN and MARS in Prediction of Property of Steel Strips. In: Abraham, A., de Baets, B., Köppen, M., Nickolay, B. (eds) Applied Soft Computing Technologies: The Challenge of Complexity. Advances in Soft Computing, vol 34. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-31662-0_26

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-31662-0_26

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-31649-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-31662-6

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics