Skip to main content

SEM Image Analysis for Roughness Assessment of Implant Materials

  • Conference paper
Computer Recognition Systems

Part of the book series: Advances in Soft Computing ((AINSC,volume 30))

Abstract

We propose a new very simple method to determine roughness of a surface of an implant material from its scanning electron microscopy (SEM) image. For this purpose we have combined a preprocessing method that has been used in histopathology with fractal method used in nonlinear time series analysis. In the pre-processing step the image is transformed into 1-D signals (‘landscapes’) that are subsequently analyzed. Our method draws from multiple disciplines and may find multidisciplinary applications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Giordano C, Sandrini E, Del Curto B, Signorelli E., Rondelli G, Di Silvio L (2004) Titanium for osteointegration: Comparison between a novel biomimetic treatment and commercially exploited surfaces. Journal of Applied Biomaterials & Biomechanics 2:35–44

    Google Scholar 

  2. Klonowski W, Olejarczyk E, Stepien R (2004) Fractal and Symbolic Methods for Nanomaterials Science and Nanosensors. E-MRS 2004 Fall Meeting Warsaw 6–10 September 2004 to be published

    Google Scholar 

  3. Klonowski W, Olejarczyk E, Stepien R (2003) New Methods of Nonlinear and Symbolic Dynamics in Sleep EEG-Signal Analysis. In: Feng DD, Carson ER (eds) Modelling and Control in Biomedical System. IFAC Publications, Elsevier, Oxford 241–244

    Google Scholar 

  4. Klonowski W (2004) W Signal and Image Analysis Using Chaos Theory and Fractal Geometry. Machine Graphics & Vision; 9: 403–431; also http://hrabia.ibib.waw.pl/~lbaf/PDF_Doc/gkpo2000.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  5. Mattfeldt T (1997) Spatial Pattern Analysis using Chaos Theory: A Nonlinear Deterministic Approach to the Histological Texture of Tumours. In: Losa GA, Merlini D, Nonnenmacher TF, Weibel ER (eds) Fractals in Biology and Medicine, Vol. II, Birkhäuser, Basel, Boston, Berlin 50–72

    Google Scholar 

  6. Higuchi T (1988) Approach to an irregular time series on the basis of the fractal theory. PhysicaD 31:277–283

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Pentland A (1988 ) The transform method for shape-from-shading. MIT Media Lab Vision Sciences Tech Report 106

    Google Scholar 

  8. Pentland A (1984) Fractal-Based Description of Natural Scenes. IEEE Trans Patt Anal Mach Intel 6:661–674

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kube P, Pentland A (1988) On the Imaging of Fractal Surfaces. IEEE Trans Patt Anal Mach Intel 10:704–707

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Klonowski W (2002) Chaotic dynamics applied to signal complexity in phase space and in time domain. Chaos, Solitons and Fractals 14:1379–1387

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Ha SW, Gisep A, Mayer J, Wintermantel E, Gruner H, Wieland M (1997) Topographical characterization and microstructural interface analysis of vacuum-plasma-sprayed titanium and hydroxyapatite coatings on carbon fibre-reinforced poly(etheretherketone). Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine 8:891–896

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kondev J, Henley CL, Salinas DG (2000) Nonlinear measures for characterizing rough surface morphologies. Physical Review E vol. 61,1:105–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lung CW, Jiang J, Tian EK, Zhang CH (1999) Relation between fractal dimension and roughness index for fractal surfaces. Physical Review E vol. 60,5:5121–5125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Tang YY, Tao Y, Lam ECM (2002) New method for feature extraction base on fractal behavior. Pattern Recognition 35:1071–1081

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Chappard D, Degasne I, Hure G, Legrand E, Audran M, Basle MF (2003) Image analysis measurements of roughness by texture and fractal analysis correlate with contact profilometry. Biomaterials 24:1399–1407

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Klonowski, W., Olejarczyk, E., Stepien, R. (2005). SEM Image Analysis for Roughness Assessment of Implant Materials. In: Kurzyński, M., Puchała, E., Woźniak, M., żołnierek, A. (eds) Computer Recognition Systems. Advances in Soft Computing, vol 30. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-32390-2_65

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-32390-2_65

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-25054-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-32390-7

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics