Skip to main content

Improving the Performance of Principal Components for Classification of Gene Expression Data Through Feature Selection

  • Conference paper
Data Science and Classification
  • 2641 Accesses

Abstract

The gene expression data is characterized by its considerably great amount of features in comparison to the number of observations. The direct use of traditional statistics techniques of supervised classification can give poor results in gene expression data. Therefore, dimension reduction is recommendable prior to the application of a classifier. In this work, we propose a method that combines two types of dimension reduction techniques: feature selection and feature extraction. First, one of the following feature selection procedures: a univariate ranking based on the Kruskal-Wallis statistic test, the Relief, and recursive feature elimination (RFE) is applied on the dataset. After that, principal components are formed with the selected features. Experiments carried out on eight gene expression datasets using three classifiers: logistic regression, k-nn and rpart, gave good results for the proposed method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • ACUNA, E. (2003), A Comparison of Filter and Wrapper Methods for Feature Selection in Supervised Classification, Proceedings of Interface Computing Science and Statistics, 35.

    Google Scholar 

  • ACUNA, E., and RODRIGUEZ, C. (2005), Dprep: data preprocessing and visualization functions for classification. R package version 1.0. http://math.uprm.edu/edgar/dprep.html.

    Google Scholar 

  • ALON, U., BARKAI, N., NOTTERMAN, D. A., GISH, K., et al. (1999). Broad patters of gene expression revealed by clustering analysis of tumor and normal colon tissues probed by oligonucleotide arrays. PNAS 96, 6745–6750.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ALIZADEH, A., EISEN, M., DAVIS, R., MA, C., LOSSOS, I., ROSENWALD, A., BOLDRICK, J., SABET, H., et al. (2000). Distinct types of diffuse large B-Cell-Lymphoma Identified by Gene Expression Profiling. Nature, 403, 503–511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • AMBROISE, C. and MCLACHLAN, G. (2002). Selection bias in gene extraction on the basis of microarray gene-expression data. PNAS vol. 99, 6562–6566.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • BAIR, E., HASTIE, T., DEBASHIS, P., and TIBSHIRANI, R. (2004). Prediction by supervised principal components. Technical Report, Departament of Statistics, Stanford University

    Google Scholar 

  • BRAGA-NETO, U. and DOUGHERTY, E. R. (2004). Is cross-validation valid for small-sample microarray classification?. Bioinformatics 20, 2465–2472.

    Google Scholar 

  • DETTLING, M. and BUHLMANN, P. (2003). Boosting for Tumor Classification with Gene Expression Data. Bioinformatics, 19, 1061–1069.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DUDOIT, S., FRIDLYAND, J. and SPEED, T. (2002). Comparison of Discrimination Methods for the Classification of Tumors Using Gene Expression Data. JASA,97, 77–87.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • GOLUB, T., SLONIM, D., TAMAYO, P., HUARD, C., GASSENBEEK, M., et al. (1999). Molecular Classification of Cancer: Class Discovery and Class Prediction by Gene Expression Monitoring. Science, 286, 531–537.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • GUYON, I. and ELISSEEFF, A. (2003). An introduction to Variable and Feature Selection. Journal of Machine Learning Research 3, 1157–1182.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • HEDENFALK, I., DUGGAN, D., CHEN, Y., RADMACHER, M., BITTNER, M., SIMON, R., MELTZER, P., et al. (2001). Gene-expression profiles in hereditary breast cancer. New England Journal of medicine 344, 539–548.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • KHAN, J., WEI, J., RINGNER, M., SAAL, L., LADANYI, M., et al. (2001). Classification and Diagnostic Prediction of Cancer Using Gene Expression Profiling and Artificial Neural Networks. Nature Medicine, 6, 673–679.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NGUYEN, D.V. and ROCKE, D. M. (2002). Multi-Class Cancer Classification via Partial Least Squares with Gene Expression Profiles Bioinformatics, 18, 1216–1226.

    Google Scholar 

  • NOTTERMAN, D. A., ALON, U., SIERK, A. J., et al. (2001). Trancriptional gene expression profiles of colorectal adenoma, adenocarcinoma, and normal tissue examined by oligonucleotide arrays. Cancer Research 61, 3124–3130.

    Google Scholar 

  • POMEROY, S., TAMAYO, P., GAASENBEEK, M., STURLA, L., ANGELO, M., MCLAUGHLIN, M., et al. (2002). Prediction of Central Nervous System EmbryonalTumor Outcome Based on Gene Expression. Nature, 415, 436–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SINGH, D., FEBBO, P., ROSS, K., JACKSON, D., MANOLA, J., LADD, C., TAMAYO, P., RENSHAW, A., et al. (2002). Gene Expression Correlates of Clinical Prostate Cancer Behavior. Cancer Cell, 1, 203–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin · Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Acuña, E., Porras, J. (2006). Improving the Performance of Principal Components for Classification of Gene Expression Data Through Feature Selection. In: Batagelj, V., Bock, HH., Ferligoj, A., Žiberna, A. (eds) Data Science and Classification. Studies in Classification, Data Analysis, and Knowledge Organization. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg . https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-34416-0_35

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics