Skip to main content

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Althoff, K.-D., Birk, A., Hartkopf, S., Mülle, W.: Managing Software Engineering Experience for Comprehensive Reuse. Eleventh International Conference on Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering (SEKE), Kaiserslautern, Germany, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Assmann, U., Wagner, G.: Ontologies, metamodels and model-driven paradigm. In Ontologies for Software Engineering and Technology, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, chapter 9 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Association for Computing Machinery: Computing Curricula 2005 — The Overview Report. 30 September 2005. ACM, AIS, IEEE-CS. Available in: http://info.acm.org/education/curricula.html

    Google Scholar 

  4. Baclawski, K., Kokar, M.K., Kogut, P.A., Hart, L., Smith, J., Holmes, W.S., Letkowski, J., Aronson, M.L., Emery, P.: Extending the Unified Modeling Language for Ontology Development. International Journal of Software and Systems Modeling (SoSyM), 1(2): 142–156, 2002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Baroni, A., Calero, C., Brito e Abreu. F. and Piattini, M. (2006) Object-Relational Database metrics formalization. Sixth International Conference on Quality Software (QSIC 2006). Beijig (China). To be published.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Barrasa, J.: Semantic Upgrade and Publication of Legacy Data. In Ontologies for Software Engineering and Technology, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, chapter 11 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bertrand, T., Bézivin, J.: Ontological Support for Business Process Improvement. In D. Bustard, P. Kawalek, M. Norris (eds.), Systems Modeling for Business Process Improvement. Artech House Publishers, London, pp. 313–331 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Boehm, B., In, H.: Identifying Quality Requirements Conflicts. IEEE Software, March: 25–35, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bose, P.: Conceptual design model based requirements analysis in the Win-Win framework for concurrrent requirements engineering. IEEE Workshop on Software Specification and Design (IWSSD), 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Brandão, A.F., Torres, V., De Lucena, C.: Ontologies as Specifications for the Verification of Multi-Agent Systems Design. In Workshop on Ontologies as Software Engineering Artifacts (OOPSLA), Vancouver, Canada, 24–28 October 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Brauner, D.F., Casanova, M.A., De Lucena, C.J.P.: Using ontologies as artifacts to enable databases interoperability. Workshop on Ontologies as Software Engineering Artifacts (OOPSLA), Vancouver, Canada, 24–28 October 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Bures, T., Denney, E., Fischer, B., Nistor, E.C.: The role of ontologies in schema-based program synthesis. Workshop on Ontologies as Software Engineering Artifacts (OOPSLA), Vancouver, Canada, 24–28 October 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Calero, C., Piattini, M.: An ontological approach to the SQL:2003. In Ontologies for Software Engineering and Technology, Springer-Verlag, Berlín, chapter 7 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Calero, C., Ruiz, F., Baroni, A.L., Brito e Abreu, F., Piattini, M.: An Ontological Approach to Describe the SQL:2003 Object-Relational Features. Computer Standards & Interfaces. Available online December 2, 2005 in: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/09205489

    Google Scholar 

  15. Chandrasekaran, B., Josephson, J.R., Benjamins, V.: Ontology of Tasks and Methods. In Proceedings of KAW’98, Banff, Alberta, Canada, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Chandrasekaran, B., Josephson, J.R., Benjamins, V.: What Are Ontologies, and Why Do We Need Them?. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 14(1) 20–26, 1999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Chen, H., Perich, F., Finin, T., Joshi, A.: SOUPA: Standard Ontology for Ubiquitous and Pervasive Applications. International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Systems: Networking and Services, Boston, USAs, 22–25 August 2004, pp. 258–267.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Chistopoulou, E., Goumopoulos, C., Kameas, A.: An ontology-based context management and reasoning process for UbiComp applications. In Proceedings of the 2005 Joint Conference on Smart Objects and Ambient Intelligence: innovative context-aware services: usages and technologies, Grenoble, France, October 2005, pp. 265–270.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Cyc: OpenCyc.org: Formalized Common Knowledge. Cycorp, USA. Available in; http://www.opencyc.org68

    Google Scholar 

  20. Denker, G.: Security Mechanisms Ontology. Computer Science Laboratory, SRI International, 2002. Available in: http://www.csl.sri.com/~denker/owl-sec/security.owl

    Google Scholar 

  21. Deridder, D.: A Concept-Oriented Approach to Support Software Maintenance and Reuse Activities. 5th Joint Conference on Knowledge-Based Software Engineering (JCKBSE), Maribor, Slovenia, September 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Deridder, D., Wouters, B.: The Use of Ontologies as a Backbone for Software Engineering Tools. Fourth Australian Knowledge Acquisition Workshop (AKAW), Sydney, Australia, December 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Deridder, D., Wouters, B., Lybaert, W.: The use of an ontology to support a coupling between software models and implementation. International Workshop on Model Engineering, 14th European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP), Sophia Antipolis and Cannes, France, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Devedzíc, V.: Understanding Ontological Engineering. Communications of the ACM, 45(4): 136–144, 2002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Dias, M.G., Anquetil, N., De Oliveira, K.M.: Organizing the Knowledge Used in Software Maintenance. Journal of Universal Computer Science, 9(7): 641–658, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Falbo, R.A., Cruz, A.C., Mian, P.G., Bertollo, G., Borges, F.: ODE: Ontology-based software Development Environment. IX Argentine Congress on Computer Science (CACIC), La Plata, Argentina, 6–7 October 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Falbo, R.A., Guizzardi, G., Duarte, K.C.: An Ontological Approach to Domain Engineering. In Procedings of 14th International Conference on Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering (SEKE), Ischia, Italy, July 1992, pp. 351–358.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Falbo, R., Menezes, C., Rocha, A.: Using Ontologies to Improve Knowledge Integration in Software Engineering Environments. 4th International Conference on Information Systems Analysis and Synthesis (ISAS), Orlando, USA, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Fernández, M., Gómez-Pérez, A., Juristo, N.: METHONTOLOGY: From Ontological Art Towards Ontological Engineering. AAAI Spring Symposium, University of Stanford, Palo Alto, California (USA), pp. 33–40, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Fensel, D: Ontologies: A Silver Bullet for Knowledge Management and Electronic Commerce. Second Edition, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg (2004).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  31. Furtado, E., Vasco, J., Bezerra, W., Tavares, D., Da Silva, L., Limbourg, Q., Vander-Donckt, J.: An ontology based method for universal design of user interfaces. Workshop on Multiple User Interfaces over the Internet, British Human Computer Interaction Group Conference (HCI/IHM), 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  32. García, E.: A proposal of a knowledge model aimed at the use of questionnaires in the usability evaluation (in Spanish). PhD Thesis, University of Alcalá, Spain, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  33. García, F., Bertoa, M.F., Calero, C., Vallecillo, A., Ruíz, F., Piattini, M., Genero, M.: Towards a consistent terminology for software measurement. Information and Software Technology. Available online August 22, 2005 in: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/09505849

    Google Scholar 

  34. García, F., Ruiz, F., Bertoa, M.F., Calero, C., Genero, M., Olsina, L.A., Martín, M.A., Quer, C., Condori, N., Abrahao, S., Vallecillo, A., Piattini, M.: Una Ontología de la Medición del Software (in Spanish). Technical Report DIAB-04-02-2, Dept. of Computer Science, University of Castilla-La Mancha. Available in: http://www.info-ab.uclm.es/trep.php

    Google Scholar 

  35. Girardi, R., Faria, C.: A Generic Ontology for the Specification of Domain Models. In Proceedings of 1st International Workshop on Component Engineering Methodology (WCEM’03) at Second International Conference on Generative Programming and Component Engineering, Erfurt, Germany, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Goldman, N.M.: Ontology-oriented programming: static typing for the inconsistent programmer. In International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC’2003), LNCS Vol. 2870, Sprinter-Verlag, Berlin, pp. 850–865 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Gómez-Pérez, A.: Knowledge sharing and reuse. In Jay Liebowitz (ed.), The Handbook of Applied Expert Systems. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Gómez Pérez, A., Fernández López, M. Corcho, O.: Ontological Engineering. Springer-Verlag, London (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  39. González-Pérez, C., Henderson-Sellers, B.: An Ontology for Software Development Methodologies and Endeavours. In Ontologies for Software Engineering and Technology, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, chapter 4 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Gruber, T.R.: A translation approach to portable ontologies. Knowledge Acquisition, 5(2): 199–220, 1993.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Gruber, T.: Towards Principles for the Design of Ontologies used for Knowledge Sharing. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 43(5/6): 907–928, 1995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Gruninger, M., Lee, J.: (2002): Ontology Applications and Design. Communications of the ACM, 45(2): 39–41, 2002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Guarino, N.: Formal Ontology in Information Systems. In Proceedings of FOIS’98, Trento, Italy. IOS Press, Amsterdam (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Guarino, N., Schneider, L.: Ontology-Driven Conceptual Modelling: Advanced Concepts. ER 2002. Pre-Conference Tutorials. Available in: http://www.loa-cnr.it/odcm.html

    Google Scholar 

  45. Guizzardi, G., Herre, H., Wagner, G.: On the General Ontological Foundations of Conceptual Modeling. 21st International Conference on Conceptual Modeling (ER), Tampere, Finland, October 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Hamza, H.S.: Improving Analysis Patterns Reuse: An Ontological Approach. Workshop on Ontologies as Software Engineering Artifacts (OOPSLA), Vancouver, Canada, 24–28 October 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Hilera, J.R., Sánchez-Alonso, S., García, E., Del Molino, C.J..: OntoGLOSE: A Light-weight Software Engineering Ontology. 1st Workshop on Ontology, Conceptualizations and Epistemology for Software and Systems Engineering (ONTOSE), Alcalá de Henares, Spain, 9–10 June 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  48. IEEE: IEEE Std 610.12-1990(R2002): IEEE Standard Glossary of Software Engineering Terminology (Reaffirmed 2002), IEEE, New York, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  49. IEEE: SWEBOK-Guide to the Software Engineering Body of Knowledge 2004 version. IEEE Computer Society. Available in: http://www.swebok.org

    Google Scholar 

  50. IEEE: Top-Level Categories for the ACM Taxonomy (extended version of the ACM Computing Classification System 2002). Available in: www.computer.org/mc/keywords/keywords.htm

    Google Scholar 

  51. ISO/IEC 9075-11:2003 Information technology — Database languages — SQL — Part 11: Information and Definition Schemas (SQL/Schemata). International Organization for Standardization, Genova.

    Google Scholar 

  52. ISO/IEC 12207:1995. Information Technology — Software Life Cycle Processes. ISO/IEC 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  53. ISO/IEC 15504-2:1998. Information Technology — Software Process Assessment — Part 2: A Reference Model for Processes and Process Capability. ISO/IEC 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Jenz, D.E.: Simplifying the software development value chain through ontology-driven software artifact generation. Jenz and Partner GmbH Strategic White Paper, 2003. Available in: http://www.bpiresearch.com/WP_BPMOntology.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  55. Jurisica, I., Mylopoulos, J., Yu, E.: Using ontologies for knowledge management: an information systems perspective. In Proceedings of 62nd Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science (ASIS99), 1999, pp. 482–496.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Kitchenham, B.A., Travassos, G.H., Mayrhauser, A., Niessink, F., Schneidewind, N.F., Singer, J., Takada, S., Vehvilainen, R., Yang, H.: Towards an Ontology of Software Maintenance. Journal of Software Maintenance: Research and Practice, 11(6): 365–389, 1999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Knublauch, H.: Ontology-driven software development in the context of the semantic web: an example scenario with protegé/OWL. First International Workshop on the Model-Driven Semantic Web (MDSW), 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Larburu, I.U., Pikatza, J.M., Sobrado, F.J., García, J.J., López, D.: Hacia la implementación de una herramienta de soporte al proceso de desarrollo de software. Workshop in Artifificial Intelligence Applications to Engineering (AIAI), San Sebastián, Spain, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Lassila, O., McGuinness, D.: The Role of Frame-Based Representation on the Semantic Web. KSL Techical Report No. KSL-01-02, Jan-2001. Available in: http://www.ksl.stanford.edu/people/dlm/etai/lassila-mcguinness-fbr-sw. html

    Google Scholar 

  60. Lin, S., Liu, F., Loe, S.: Building A Knowledge Base of IEEE/EAI 12207 and CMMI with Ontology. Sixth International Protégé Workshop, Manchester, England, 7–9 July 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Liu, F., Lo, S.: The Study on Ontology Integrating and Applying the Ontologies of IEEE/EIA 12207, CMMI, Workflow and J2EE to Web Service Development Environment. Sixth International Protégé Workshop, Manchester, England, 7–9 July 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Martin, D. (ed.): OWL-based Web Service Ontology. OWL-S Coalition, 2004. Available in: http://www.daml.org/services/owl-s

    Google Scholar 

  63. Meersman, R.A.: The Use of Lexicons and Other Computer-Linguistic Tools in Semantics Design and Cooperation of Database Systems. In Y. Zhang (ed.), CODAS Conference Proceedings, Springer-Verlag, Berlin (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  64. Mendes, O., Abran, A.: Issues in the development of an ontology for an emerging engineering discipline. First Workshop on Ontology, Conceptualizations and Epistemology for Software and Systems Engineering (ONTOSE), Alcalá de Henares, Spain, 9–10 June 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  65. Mian, P.G., Falbo, R.A.: Building ontologies in a domain oriented software engineering environment. IX Argentine Congress on Computer Science (CACIC), La Plata, Argentina 6–7 October 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  66. MIT: RDF Ontology Collection. Simile Project, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, USA, 2004. Available in: http://simile.mit.edu/repository/ontologies/java

    Google Scholar 

  67. Mylopoulos, J.: Ontologies. Visited on January 4, 2006 in: http://www.cs.toronto.edu/~jm/2507S/Notes04/Ontologies.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  68. Newell, A.: The Knowledge Level. Artificial Intelligence, 18: 87–127, 1982.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Nour, P., Holz, H., Maurer, F.: Ontology-based retrieval of software process experiences. ICSE Workshop on Software Engineering over the Internet, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  70. Oberle, D., Eberhart, A., Staab, S., Volz, R.: Developing and Managing Software Components in an Ontology-based Application Server. 5th International Middleware Conference, Toronto, Canada, 18–22 October 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  71. Object Management Group: Meta Object Facility (MOF) Specification; version 1.4, April 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  72. Oliveira, K.M., Villela, K., Rocha, A.R., Horta, G.: Use of Ontologies in Software Development Environments. In Ontologies for Software Engineering and Technology, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, chapter 10 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  73. Ostertag, E., Hendler, J., Prieto-Díaz, R., Braun, C.: Computing similarity in a reuse library system: an AI-based approach. ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology, 1(3): 205–228, 1992.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Pahl, C.: Ontology-based description and reasoning for component-based development on the Web. In Procedings of ESEC/FSE Workshop on Specification and Verification of Component-based Systems (SAVCBS’03), Helsinki, Finland, September 2003, pp. 84–87.

    Google Scholar 

  75. Pisanelli, D.M., Gangemi, A., Steve, G.: Ontologies and Information Systems: the Marriage of the Century?. In Proceedings of LYEE Workshop, Paris, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  76. Polo, M., Piattini, M., Ruiz, F., Calero, C.: MANTEMA: A Software Maintenance Methodology based on the ISO/IEC 12207 Standard. 4th IEEE International Software Engineering Standards Symposium (ISESS), Curitiba, Brazil. IEEE Computer Society, pp. 76–81, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  77. Pressman, R.S.: Software Engineering: A Practitioner’s Approach. Sixth Edition. McGraw-Hill, New York, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  78. Roman, D., Lausen, H., Keller, U. (eds.): Web Service Modeling Ontology (WSMO), SDK WSMO Working Group, 2005. Available in: http://www.wsmo.org

    Google Scholar 

  79. Ruiz, F., García, F., Piattini, M., Polo, M.: Environment for Managing Software Maintenance Projects. In “Advances in Software Maintenance Management: Technologies and Solutions”. Idea Group Publication (USA), chapter X, pp. 255–290, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  80. Ruiz, F., Vizcaíno, A., Piattini, M., García, F.: An Ontology for the Management of Software Maintenance Projects. International Journal of Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering, 14(3): 323–349, 2004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. Sánchez, D.M., Cavero, J.M., Marcos, E.: An ontology about ontologies and models: a conceptual discussion. First Workshop on Ontology, Conceptualizations and Epistemology for Software and Systems Engineering (ONTOSE), Alcalá de Henares, Spain, 9–10 June 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  82. Schleicher, A., Westfechtel, B.: Beyond Stereotyping: Metamodeling Approaches for the UML. 34th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), Maui, Hawaii (USA), January 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  83. Schmidt, D.C.: Model-Driven Engineering. IEEE Computer, special issue on model-driven software development, 39(2): 25–31, February 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  84. SEI: Capability Maturity Model Integration (CMMI), Software Engineering Institute, 2002. Available in: http://www.sei.cmu.edu/cmmi/

    Google Scholar 

  85. Sicilia, M.A.., Cuadrado, J.J., García, E., Rodríguez, D., Hilera, J.R..: The evaluation of ontological representation of the SWEBOK as a revision tool. In 29th Annual International Computer Software and Application Conference (COMPSAC), Edinburgh, UK, 26–28 July 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  86. Spyns, P., Meersman, R., Jarrar, M.: Data Modelling versus Ontology Engineering. SIGMOD Record 31(4): 12–7, 2002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  87. Stumme, G., Maedche, A.: FCA-MERGE: Bottom-Up Merging of Ontologies. Seventeenth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI), Seattle, Washington, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  88. Swoogle: Semantic Web Search. University of Maryland Baltimore County (UMBC), 2006. Available in: http://swoogle.umbc.edu

    Google Scholar 

  89. Tansalarak, N., Claypool, K.T.: XCM: A Component Ontology. Workshop on Ontologies as Software Engineering Artifacts (OOPSLA), Vancouver, Canada, 24–28 October 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  90. Tautz, C., Von Wangenheim, C.: REFSENO: A Representation Formalism for Software Engineering Ontologies. Fraunhofer IESE-Report No. 015.98/E, version 1.1, October 20, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  91. Uschold, M., Gruninger, M.: Ontologies: Principles, Methods and Applications. Knowledge Engineering Review, 11(2): 93–15, 1996.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  92. Uschold, M., Jasper, R.: A Framework for Understanding and Classifying Ontology Applications. In Proceedings of IJCAI Workshop on Ontologies and Problem-Solving Methods, August 1999. Visited on January 8, 2006 in: http://sunsite.informatik.rwth-aachen.de/Publications/CEUR-WS//Vol-18/

    Google Scholar 

  93. Uschold, M., King, M.: Towards a Methodology for Building Ontologies. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Basic Issues in Knowledge Sharing (hosts within IJCAI), 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  94. Van Heijst, G., Schereiber, A.T., Wielinga, B.J.: Using Explicit Ontologies in KBS Development. International Journal of Human and Computer Studies, 46(2/3), 1997, pp. 293–310.

    Google Scholar 

  95. Vieira, T.A., Casanova, M.A.: Flexible Workflow Execution through an Ontology-based Approach. Workshop on Ontologies as Software Engineering Artifacts (OOPSLA), Vancouver, Canada, 24–28 October 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  96. Vizcaíno, A., Anquetil, N., Oliveira, K., Ruiz, F., Piattini, M.: Merging Software Maintenance Ontologies: Our Experience. First Workshop on Ontology, Conceptualizations and Epistemology for Software and Systems Engineering (ONTOSE), Alcala de Henares, Spain, 9–10 June 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  97. Wang, X., Chan, C.W.: Ontology Modeling Using UML. 7th International Conference on Object Oriented Information Systems (OOIS), Calgary, Canada, pp. 59–68, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  98. Wang, X., Chan, C., Hamilton, H.: Design of knowledge-based systems with the ontology-domain-system approach. In Proceedings of SEKE 2002, pp. 233–236.

    Google Scholar 

  99. World Wide Web Consortium (W3C): Ontology Driven Architectures and Potential Uses of the Semantic Web in Systems and Software Engineering. Draft 2006/02/11. Available in: http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/SE/ODA/

    Google Scholar 

  100. Wouters, B., Deridder, D., Van Paesschen, E.: The use of ontologies as a backbone for use case management. European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP), 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  101. Zimmer, C., Rauschmayer, A.: Tuna: Ontology-Based Source Code Navigation and Annotation. Workshop on Ontologies as Software Engineering Artifacts (OOPSLA), Vancouver, Canada, 24–28 October 2004.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ruiz, F., Hilera, J.R. (2006). Using Ontologies in Software Engineering and Technology. In: Calero, C., Ruiz, F., Piattini, M. (eds) Ontologies for Software Engineering and Software Technology. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg . https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-34518-3_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-34518-3_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-34517-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-34518-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics