Abstract
This paper discusses the use of usage information to enhance cooperative behaviour from query answering systems. A user can pose a query to the system by providing (at query time) update and preference information. Updates allow us to model dynamically evolving worlds and preferences allow us to facilitate the retrieval of information by targeting the answers of the system with respect to users’ interests in a given context.
Pereira acknowledges the support of POCTI project 40958 “FLUX - FleXible Logical Updates” and Dell'Acqua a Research Grant by the Stiftelsen Lars Hiertas Minne.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
J. J. Alferes, P. Dell'Acqua, and L. M. Pereira. A compilation of updates plus preferences. To appear in: Logic in Artificial Intelligence (Jelia’02), LNAI, 2002.
J. J. Alferes, J. A. Leite, L. M. Pereira, H. Przymusinska, and T. C. Przymusinski. Dynamic updates of non-monotonic knowledge bases. The J. of Logic Programming, 45(1-3):43–70, 2000. A short version titled Dynamic Logic Programming appeared in A. Cohn and L. Schubert (eds.), KR’98, Morgan Kaufmann.
J. J. Alferes and L. M. Pereira. Updates plus preferences. In M. O. Aciego et al. (eds.), Logics in AI, Procs. JELIA’00, LNAI 1919, pp. 345–360, Berlin, 2000.
G. Brewka. Well-founded semantics for extended logic programs with dynamic preferences. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 4, 1996.
G. Brewka and T. Eiter. Preferred answer sets for extended logic programs. Artificial Intelligence, 109, 1999.
M. Gelfond and V. Lifschitz. The stable model semantics for logic programming. In R. A. Kowalski and K. Bowen (eds.), Proc. of the Fifth Int. Conf. on Logic Programming, pp. 1070–1080, Cam bridge, MA, 1988. The MIT Press.
K. Inoue and C. Sakama. Negation as failure in the head. Journal of Logic Programming, 35:39–78, 1998.
V. Lifschitz and T. Woo. Answer sets in general non-monotonic reasoning (preliminary report). In B. Nebel et al. (eds.), KR’92. Morgan-Kaufmann, 1992.
J. Minker. An overview of cooperative answering in databases. (Invited paper.) Int. Conf. on Flexible Query Answering Systems (FQAS), 1998.
J. Pagonis and M. C. Sinclair. Evolving user profiles to reduce internet information overload. In R. John and R. Birkenhead (eds.), Int. Conf. on Recent Advances in Soft Computing, Advances in Soft Computing 232, pp. 100–107. Springer, 2000.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2002 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Dell'Acqua, P., Moniz Pereira, L., Vitória1, A. (2002). User Preference Information in Query Answering. In: Carbonell, J.G., Siekmann, J., Andreasen, T., Christiansen, H., Motro, A., Legind Larsen, H. (eds) Flexible Query Answering Systems. FQAS 2002. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 2522. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-36109-X_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-36109-X_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-00074-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-36109-1
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive