Skip to main content

Visual Categorization: How the Monkey Brain Does It

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Biologically Motivated Computer Vision (BMCV 2002)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 2525))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Object categorization is a crucial cognitive ability. It has also received much attention in machine vision. However, the computational processes underlying object categorization in cortex are still poorly understood. In this paper we compare data recorded by Freedman et al. from monkeys to that of view-tuned units in our HMAX model of object recognition in cortex [1],[2]. We FInd that the results support a model of object recognition in cortex [3] in which a population of shape-tuned neurons responding to individual exemplars provides a general basis for neurons tuned to different recognition tasks. Simulations further indicate that this strategy of first learning a general but object class-specific representation as input to a classifier simplifies the learning task. Indeed, the physiological data suggest that in the monkey brain, categorization is performed by PFC neurons performing a simple classification based on the thresholding of a linear sum of the inputs from examplar-tuned units. Such a strategy has various computational advantages, especially with respect to transfer across novel recognition tasks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. M. Riesenhuber and T. Poggio. Are cortical models really bound by the “Binding Problem”? Neuron, 24:87–93, 1999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. M. Riesenhuber and T. Poggio. Hierarchical models of object recognition in cortex. Nat. Neurosci., 2:1019–1025, 1999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. M. Riesenhuber and T. Poggio. Models of object recognition. Nat. Neurosci. Supp., 3:1199–1204, 2000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. D.J. Freedman, M. Riesenhuber, T. Poggio, and E.K. Miller. Categorical representation of visual stimuli in the primate prefrontal cortex. Science, 291:312–316, 2001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. N.K. Logothetis, J. Pauls, and T. Poggio. Shape representation in the inferior temporal cortex of monkeys. Curr. Biol., 5:552–563, 1995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. K. Fukushima. Neocognitron: A self-organizing neural network model for a mechanism of pattern recognition unaffected by shift in position. Biol. Cyb., 36:193–202, 1980.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. C. Shelton. Three-Dimensional Correspondence. Master’s thesis, MIT, Cambridge, MA, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  8. U. Knoblich, D.J. Freedman, and M. Riesenhuber. Categorization in IT and PFC: Model and Experiments. AI Memo 2002-007, CBCL Paper 216, MIT AI Laband CBCL, Cambridge, MA, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  9. M. Riesenhuber and T. Poggio. A note on object class representation and categorical perception. AI Memo 1679, CBCL Paper 183, MIT AI Laband CBCL, Cambridge, MA, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  10. N.A. Macmillan and C.D. Creelman. Detection Theory: A User’s Guide. 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  11. H.O. de Beeck, J. Wagemans, and R. Vogels. Inferotemporal neurons represent lowdimensional configurations of parametrized shapes. Nat. Neurosci., 4:1244–1252, 2001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. N. Sigala and N. Logothetis. Visual categorization shapes feature selectivity in the primate temporal cortex. Nature, 415:318–320, 2002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. N. Intrator and S. Edelman. Learning low dimensional representations via the usage of multiple class labels. Network, 8:283–296, 1997.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. S. Edelman. Representation and Recognition in Vision. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Knoblich, U., Riesenhuber, M., Freedman, D.J., Miller, E.K., Poggio, T. (2002). Visual Categorization: How the Monkey Brain Does It. In: Bülthoff, H.H., Wallraven, C., Lee, SW., Poggio, T.A. (eds) Biologically Motivated Computer Vision. BMCV 2002. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2525. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-36181-2_27

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-36181-2_27

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-00174-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-36181-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics