Skip to main content

A Goal Oriented Attention Guidance Model

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Biologically Motivated Computer Vision (BMCV 2002)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 2525))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Previous experiments have shown that human attention is influenced by high level task demands. In this paper, we propose an architecture to estimate the task-relevance of attended locations in a scene.We maintain a task graph and compute relevance of fixations using an ontology that contains a description of real world entities and their relationships. Our model guides attention according to a topographic attention guidance map that encodes the bottom-up salience and task-relevance of all locations in the scene.We have demonstrated that our model detects entities that are salient and relevant to the task even on natural cluttered scenes and arbitrary tasks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. M Corbetta, J M Kincade, J M Ollinger, M P McAvoy, and G L Shulman. Voluntary orienting is dissociated from target detection in human posterior parietal cortex [published erratum appears in nat neurosci 2000 may;3(5):521]. Nature Neuroscience, 3(3):292–297, Mar 2000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. D Walther, L Itti, M Reisenhuber, T Poggio, C Koch. Attentional Selection for Object Recognition—a GentleWay. BMCV2002, in press.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Gerd Herzog and Peter Wazinski. VIsual TRAnslator: Linking perceptions and natural language descriptions. Artificial Intelligence Review, 8(2–3):175–187, 1994.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. J B Hopfinger, M H Buonocore, and G R Mangun. The neural mechanisms of top-down attentional control. Nature Neuroscience, 3(3):284–291, Mar 2000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. L. Itti and C. Koch. A saliency-based search mechanism for overt and covert shifts of visual attention. Vision Research, 40(10–12):1489–1506, May 2000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. L. Itti and C. Koch. Computational modeling of visual attention. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 2(3):194–203, Mar 2001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. L. Itti and C. Koch. Feature Combination Strategies for Saliency-Based Visual Attention Systems. Journal of Electronic Imaging, 10(1):161–169, Jan 2001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. L. Itti, C. Koch, and E. Niebur. A model of saliency-based visual attention for rapid scene analysis. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 20(11):1254–1259, Nov 1998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. C Koch and S Ullman. Shifts in selective visual attention: towards the underlying neural circuitry. Human Neurobiology, 4(4):219–27, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Nuria M. Oliver, Barbara Rosario, and Alex Pentland. A bayesian computer vision system for modeling human interactions. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 22(8):831–843, 2000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. D. Parkhurst, K. Law, and E. Niebur. Modeling the role of salience in the allocation of overt visual attention. Vision Research, 42(1):107–123, Jan 2002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. I. A. Rybak, V. I. Gusakova, A. V. Golovan, L. N. Podladchikova, and N. A. Shevtsova. A model of attention-guided visual perception and recognition. Vision Research, 38:2387–2400, 1998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. A M Treisman and G Gelade. Afeature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive Pyschology, 12(1):97–136, Jan 1980.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. J K Tsotsos. Computation, pet images, and attention. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 18(2):372, 1995.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. van de P. Laar, T. Heskes, and S. Gielen. Task-dependent learning of attention. Neural Networks, 10(6):981–992, 1997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. J M Wolfe. Visual search in continuous, naturalistic stimuli. Vision Research, 34(9):1187–95, May 1994.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. A Yarbus. Eye Movements and Vision. Plenum Press, NewYork, 1967.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Navalpakkam, V., Itti, L. (2002). A Goal Oriented Attention Guidance Model. In: Bülthoff, H.H., Wallraven, C., Lee, SW., Poggio, T.A. (eds) Biologically Motivated Computer Vision. BMCV 2002. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2525. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-36181-2_45

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-36181-2_45

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-00174-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-36181-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics