Abstract
Distributed Knowledge Management is an approach to Knowledge Management based on the principle that the multiplicity (and heterogeneity) of perspectives within complex organizations should not be viewed as an obstacle to knowledge exploitation, but rather as an opportunity that can foster innovation and creativity. Despite a wide agreement on this principle, most current KM systems are based on the idea that all perspectival aspects of knowledge should be eliminated in favor of an objective and general representation of knowledge. In this paper we propose a peer-to-peer architecture (called KEx), which embodies the principle above in a quite straightforward way: (i) each peer (called a K-peer) provides all the services needed to create and organize “local” knowledge from an individual’s or a group’s perspective, and (ii) social structures and protocols of meaning negotiation are defined to achieve semantic coordination among autonomous peers (e.g., when searching documents from other K-peers).
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
M. Arumugam, A. Sheth, and I. Budak Arpinar. The peer-to-peer semantic web:A distributed environment for sharing semantic knowledge on the web. In WWW2002 Workshop on Real World RDF and Semantic Web Applications. Honolulu, Hawaii (USA), 2002.
M. Benerecetti, P. Bouquet, and C. Ghidini. Contextual Reasoning Distilled. Journal of Theoretical and Experimental Artificial Intelligence, 12(3):279–305, July 2000.
J.R. Boland and R.V. Tenkasi. Perspective making and perspective taking in communities of knowing. Organization Science, 6(4):350–372, 1995.
M. Bonifacio, P. Bouquet, and R. Cuel. Knowledge Nodes: the Building Blocks of a Distributed Approach to Knowledge Management. Journal of Universal Computer Science, 8(6):652–661, 2002. Springer Pub. & Co.
M. Bonifacio, P. Bouquet, and A. Manzardo. A distributed intelligence paradigm for knowledge management. In Working Notes of the AAAI Spring Symposium Series 2000 on Bringing Knowledge to Business Processes. AAAI, March 18–20 2000.
M. Bonifacio, P. Bouquet, and P. Traverso. Enabling distributed knowledge management. managerial and technological implications. Novatica and Informatik/Informatique, III(1), 2002.
P. Bouquet. Contesti e ragionamento contestuale. Il ruolo del contesto in una teoria della rappresentazione della conoscenza. Pantograph, Genova (Italy), 1998.
P. Bouquet, A. Doná, and L. Serafini. ConTeXtualizedlocal ontology specification via ctxml. In MeaN-02-AAAI workshop on Meaning Negotiation, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, 2002.
G. C. Bowker and S. L. Star. Sorting things out: classification and its consequences. MIT Press., 1999.
J. Dinsmore. Partitioned Representations. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1991.
D. Dougherty. Interpretative barriers to successful product innovation in large firms. Organization Science, 3(2), 1992.
G. Fauconnier. Mental Spaces: aspects of meaning construction in natural language. MIT Press, 1985.
C. Ghidini and F. Giunchiglia. Local Models Semantics, or Contextual Reasoning = Locality + Compatibility. Artificial Intelligence, 127(2):221–259, April 2001.
F. Giunchiglia and I. Zaihrayeu. Making peer databases interact-a vision for an architecture supporting data coordination. In 6th International Workshop on Cooperative Information Agents (CIA-2002), Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, Madrid, Spain, September 18–20, 2002, 2002. Invited talk.
I. Goffaman. Frame Analysis. Harper & Row, NewYork, 1974.
T. Kuhn. The structure of Scientific Revolutions. University of Chicago Press, 1979.
B. Magnini, L. Serafini, and M. Speranza. Linguistic based matching of local ontologies. In P. Bouquet, editor, Working Notes of the AAAI-02 workshop on Meaning Negotiation. Edmonton (Canada). AAAI, AAAI Press, 2002.
J. McCarthy. Notes on Formalizing Context. In Proc. of the 13th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 555–560, Chambery, France, 1993.
M.P. Papazoglou, J. Jang, and B.J. Kraemer. Leveraging web-services and peer-to-peer networks. October 2002.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2002 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Bonifacio, M., Bouquet, P., Mameli, G., Nori, M. (2002). KEx:A Peer-to-Peer Solution for Distributed Knowledge Management. In: Karagiannis, D., Reimer, U. (eds) Practical Aspects of Knowledge Management. PAKM 2002. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 2569. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-36277-0_43
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-36277-0_43
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-00314-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-36277-7
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive