Abstract
To achieve a human level of understanding of natural language, cognitive systems need a representation of knowledge that can distinguish nuances of meaning as well as preserve intended ambiguity. Among the most important of the basic concepts in such a knowledge base are the representations for events and processes, and also for objects and substances. Although each concept in these related pairs of concepts appears distinct intuitively and linguistically, the distinction is sometimes lost when the concepts are formalized. In different ontologies one finds a variety of different representations for these four fundamental concepts. This paper presents a new representation which uses an extension of dimensional analysis to qualitative dimensions to provide distinct and logically well-defined yet intuitively acceptable definitions for these four fundamental concepts, and specifies how they relate to other fundamental concepts in an upper ontology. In this analysis, processes extended through time result in events, and substances extending through space constitute objects. These representations are expected to be better suited than alternatives for representing the nuances of meaning in linguistic utterances.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
James Higginbotham, Fabio Pianesi and Achille C. Varzi, Speaking of Events (New York, Oxford University Press, 2000).
Ray Jackendoff, Semantic Structures (Cambridge, Mass., MIT Press, 1990).
Lenat and Guha [1990] Douglas B. Lenat and R. V. Guha, Building Large Knowledge-Based Systems: Representation and Inference in the CYC Project. (Reading, Mass., Addison-Wesley)
CYC Upper Ontology. Available from Cycorp at http://www.cyc.com.
John F. Sowa, Processes and Causality [preprint, 2002] Available at: http://www.jfsowa.com/ontology/causal.htm.
Michael J. Loux, Metaphysics (New York, Routledge, 1998).
M. R. Genesereth and R. E. Fikes, Knowledge Interchange Format, Version 3.0 Reference Manual, Tech. Report KSL-92-86, Knowledge Systems Laboratory, June 1992.
Patrick Hayes and Christopher Menzel, A Semantics for the Knowledge Interchange Format. pp. 13–20 in the Proceedings of the Workshop on the IEEE Standard Upper Ontology, Aug. 6, 2001, Seattle Washington (in association with IJCAI-2001).
Process Specification Language. National Institutes of Standards and Technology, The PSL Ontology, available at http://www.mel.nist.gov/psl/psl-ontology/.
Jerry Hobbs and James Pustejovsky, Annotating and Reasoning about Time and Events. http://www.cs.rochester.edu/~ferguson/daml/hobbs-pustejovsky.pdf (preprint, 2002).
Jerry R. Hobbs, A DAML Ontology of Time, http://www.cs.rochester.edu/~ferguson/daml/daml-time-20020830.txt
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2003 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Cassidy, P. (2003). Dimensional Analysis to Clarify Relations among the Top-Level Concepts of an Upper Ontology: Process, Event, Substance, Object . In: Gelbukh, A. (eds) Computational Linguistics and Intelligent Text Processing. CICLing 2003. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2588. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-36456-0_35
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-36456-0_35
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-00532-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-36456-6
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive