Skip to main content

TCP-SACK Analysis and Improvement through OMQN Models

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Quality of Service in Multiservice IP Networks (QoS-IP 2003)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 2601))

Abstract

Protocol design and modification was traditionally based on heuristic processes and decisions. In particular several new versions of TCP have been proposed which not always stand up to their expectations when they are deployed or simply simulated in a real scenario. The closed-loop, nonlinear characteristics of TCP makes it very difficult to predict its performance in even simple scenarios. This papers analyses the process of modeling TCP-SACK with an Open Multiclass Queueing Network (OMQN) model, showing that sometimes simple implementation choices can have a non-marginal impact on the performance and discussing how an analytical model can be used to design and study TCP (or other protocols) modifications and improvements. As an example we present a modified, more robust implementation of TCP-SACK, named R-SACK, that significantly reduces the protocol timeout probability in presence of bursty losses.

This work was supported by the ItalianMinistry for Education and Scientific Research through the PLANET-IP Project.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. M. Mathis, J. Mahdavi, S. Floyd, A. Romanow, “TCP Selective Acknowledgement Options,” RFC 2018, IETF, Oct. 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  2. L. Brakmo, L. Peterson, “TCP Vegas: End to End Congestion Avoidance on a Global Internet,” IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 13(8), Oct. 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  3. M. Mathis, J. Mahdavi, “Forward Acknowledgement: Refining TCP Congestion Control,” Computer Communications Review, 26(4), 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  4. S. Floyd, “TCP and Explicit Congestion Notification,” ACM Computer Communication Review, Vol. 24 No. 5, Pages 10–23, Oct. 1994.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. K.K. Ramakrishnan, S. Floyd, “A Proposal to add Explicit Congestion Notification (ECN) to IP,” RFC 2481, IETF, Jan. 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  6. M. Gerla, M.Y. Sanadidi, R. Wang, A. Zanella, C. Casetti, S. Mascolo, “TCPWestwood: Congestion Window Control Using Bandwidth Estimation,” In Proc. of IEEE Globecom 2001, San Antonio, Texas, USA, Nov. 25–29, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  7. C. Casetti, M. Gerla, S. Mascolo, M.Y. Sanadidi, R. Wang, “TCP Westwood: End-to-End Congestion Control for Wired/Wireless Network,” ACM Wireless Networks (WINET) N. 8, pp. 467–479, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  8. L.A. Grieco, S. Mascolo, R. Ferorelli, “Additive Increase Adaptive Decrease Congestion Control: a mathematical model and its experimental validation,” In Proc. IEEE Symposium on Computer and Communications, Taormina, Italy, July 1–4, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  9. L. Kalampoukas, A. Varma, K.K. Ramakrishnan, “Explicit Window Adaptation: A Method to Enhance TCP Performance,” In Proc. IEEE Infocom’98, San Francesco, CA, USA, March 29–April 2, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  10. M. Gerla, R. Lo Cigno, S. Mascolo, W. Weng, “Generalized Window Advertising for TCP Congestion Control,” European Transaction on Telecommunication, Accepted for Publication, preprint available, http://www.tlc-networks.polito.it/locigno/papers/ett01.ps.

  11. W. Stevens, “TCP Slow Start, Congestion Avoidance, Fast Retransmit, and Fast Recovery Algorithms,” RFC 2001, IETF, Jan. 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  12. T. Bu, D. Towsley, “Fixed Point Approximation for TCP Behavior in an AQM Network,” ACM SIGMETRICS 2001, June 16–20, Cambridge, MA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  13. R. Lo Cigno, M. Gerla, “Modeling Window Based Congestion Control Protocols with Many Flows”, Performance Evaluation, No. 36–37, pp. 289–306, Elsevier Science, Aug. 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  14. M. Garetto, R. Lo Cigno, M. Meo, M. Ajmone Marsan, “A Detailed and Accurate Closed Queueing NetworkModel ofMany Interacting TCP Flows,” in Proc. IEEE Infocom’01, April 22–26, Anchorage, Alaska, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  15. E. Alessio, M. Garetto, R. Lo Cigno, M. Meo, M. Ajmone Marsan, “Analytical Estimation of the Completion Time of Mixed NewReno and Tahoe TCP Traffic over Single and Multiple Bottleneck Networks,” in Proc. of IEEE Globecom 2001, San Antonio, Texas, November 25–29, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  16. M. Garetto, R. Lo Cigno, M. Meo, M. Ajmone Marsan, “On the Use of Queueing Network Models to Predict the Performance of TCP Connections,” Proc. 2001 Tyrrhenian International Workshop on Digital Communications, Taormina (CT), Italy, Sept. 17–20, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  17. M. Garetto, R. Lo Cigno, M. Meo, E. Alessio, M. Ajmone Marsan, “Modeling Short-Lived TCP Connections with Open Multiclass Queueing Networks,” 7th International Workshop on Protocols For High-Speed Networks (PfHSN 2002), Berlin, Germany, April 22–24, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  18. R. Lo Cigno, G. Procissi, M. Gerla, “Sender-Side TCP Modifications: An Analytical Study,” IFIP Networking 2002, Pisa (Italy), May 19–24, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  19. K. Fall, S. Floyd, “Simulation-based Comparisons of Tahoe, Reno and SACK TCP,” ACM Computer Communication Review, July 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  20. E. Blanton, M. Allman, K. Fall, “A Conservative SACK-based Loss Recovery Algorithm for TCP,” IETF Internet Draft (work in progress), July 2002, http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-allman-tcp-sack-12.txt

  21. B. Sikdar, S. Kalyanaraman, K. S. Vastola, “Analytic Models and Comparative Study of the Latency and Steady-State Throughput of TCP Tahoe, Reno and SACK,” in Proc. of IEEE Globecom 2001, San Antonio, Texas, November 25–29, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  22. W.R. Stevens. TCP/IP Illustrated, vol. 1. Addison Wesley, Reading, MA, USA, 1994.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Bagnus, M., Lo Cigno, R. (2003). TCP-SACK Analysis and Improvement through OMQN Models. In: Marsan, M.A., Corazza, G., Listanti, M., Roveri, A. (eds) Quality of Service in Multiservice IP Networks. QoS-IP 2003. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2601. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-36480-3_29

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-36480-3_29

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-00604-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-36480-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics