Skip to main content

Relationship-Based Dynamic Versioning of Evolving Legal Documents

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
  • 395 Accesses

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 2543))

Abstract

Rule evolution is usually performed by creating a new document which explicitly details changes to specific parts inside other rules’s content. Obtaining (virtual) document versions corresponding to a rules’s state at a specific date is thus left to document users, who manually extract from library collections, and compose, the pieces of text needed to obtain the desired version. When changes are numerous this can be a tedious task. We propose a solution to dynamically generate virtual rule versions on user demand, respecting the library documents integrity. References to other documents and modification relationships can be automatically detected and are modelled as typed links - modelled with XLink - in a relationships graph. This graph can be used to query relationships, to create hypertext, and to dynamically generate rule versions. In this paper, we focus on the version generation process: a dynamic document composition based in a graph traversal, during which we intelligently infer the composition rules of the desired version.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Agosti, M., and Allan, J. Methods and tools for the construction of hypertext. Information Processing and Management 33, 2 (1997), 129–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Agosti, M., Colotti, R., and Gradenigo, G. A two-level hypertext retrieval model for legal data. In 14th ACM-SIGIR International Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (Dipartamento di Elettronica e Informatica, Universita’di Padova, Oct. 1991), Chicago, IL USA, pp. 316–325.

    Google Scholar 

  3. André, J., Furuta, R., and Quint, V. Structured documents: What and why? In Structured Documents (1989), J. André, R. Furuta, and V. Quint, Eds., Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Arms, W. Y., Blanchi, C., and Overly, E. A. An Architecture for Information in Digital Libraries. D-Lib Magazine (Feb. 1997).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Arnold-Moore, T., Anderson, P., and Sacks-Davis, R. Managing a digital library of legislation. In 2nd ACM International Conference on Digital Libraries, ACM DL 1997 (Philadelphia, PA, USA, July 1997), ACM Press, pp. 175–183.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Arnold-Moore, T., Fuller, M., Kent, A., Sacks-Davis, R., and Sharman, N. Architecture of a content management server for XML document applications. In 1st International Conference on Web Information Systems Engineering (WISE 2000) (Hong Kong, June 2000).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Biagioni, S., Carlesi, C., and Castelli, D. Supporting retrieval by ‘relation amog documents’ in the ERCIM Technical Reference Digital Library. In 11th ERCIM Database Research Group Workshop on Metadata for Web Databases (May 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Chawathe, S. S., Rajaraman, A., Garcia-Molina, H., and Widom, J. Change detection in hierarchically structured information. SIGMOD Record (ACM Special Interest Group on Management of Data) 25, 2 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Choquette, M., Poulin, D., and Bratley, P. Compiling Legal Hypertexts. In Database and Expert Systems Applications, 6th International Conference, DEXA’95 (Sept. 1995), N. Revell and A. M. Tjoa, Eds., vol. 978 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer, pp. 449–458.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Conklin, J. Hypertext: An introduction and survey. IEEE Computer 20, 9 (1987), 17–41.

    Google Scholar 

  11. DeRose, S. J. Expanding the Notion of Links. In Proceedings of Hypertext’89 (Pittsburgh, PA Baltimore, 1989), N. Meyorwitz, Ed., Association for Computing Machinery Press, pp. 249–255.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Finke, N. TEI Extensions for Legal Text. In Text Encoding Initiative Tenth Anniversary User Conference (Providence, Rhode Island, USA, Nov. 1997).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Furuta, R. Concepts and models for structured documents. In Structured Documents (1989), J. André, R. Furuta, and V. Quint, Eds., Cambridge University Press, pp. 7–38.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Haider, G., Sjöberg, C. M., Quirchmay, G., and Sebald, V. The Comparative Part of the Corpus Legis Project-Using SGML for Intelligent Information Retrieval of Legal Documents. In EXPERSYS-96, Artificial Intelligence Applications. (1996), A. Niku-Lari., Ed., Technology Transfer Series, pp. 181–186.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Noticias jurídicas. http://noticias.juridicas.com/

  16. Liu, P., and Hsu, L. H. A Logic Approach to XML Document Update Query Specifications. In XML Europe 2001 (Berlin, Germany, May 2001).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Martínez González, M. Dynamic exploitation of relationships between documents in digital libraries: application to legal documents. PhD thesis, Institut National Polytechnique de Lorraine / LORIA, Sept. 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Niederée, C., ans Joachim W. Schimdt, U. S., and Matthes, F. Aging Links. In Research and Advanced Technology for Digital Libraries, 4th European Conference, ECDL 2000 (Lisbon, Portugal, Sept. 2000), J. L. Borbinha and T. Baker, Eds., vol. 1923 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer, pp. 269–279.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Paskin, N. DOI: Current Status and Outlook May 1999. D-Lib Magazine (May 1999). http://www.dlib.org/dlib/may99/05paskin.html.

  20. Sjöberg, C. M. DTD development for the legal domain. In Swedis SGML 97 (1997). http://info.admin.kth.se/SGML/.

  21. W3C, the World Wide Web Consortium. XML Linking Language (XLink) Version 1.0, June 2001. W3C Recommendation 27 June 2001. http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/REC-xlink-20000627.

  22. W3C, the World Wide Web Consortium. XML Pointer Language (XPointer) Version 1.0, Sept. 2001. W3C Candidate Recommendation 11 September 2001. http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/WD-xptr-20010108.

  23. Wilson, E. Links and structures in hypertext databases for law. In European Conference on Hypertext, ECHT’90 (Paris (France), 1990), A. Rizk, N. A. Streitz, and J. André, Eds., The Cambridge Series on Electronic Publishing, Cambridge University Press, pp. 194–211.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Mercedes Martínez, M., de la Fuente, P., Derniame, JC., Pedrero, A. (2003). Relationship-Based Dynamic Versioning of Evolving Legal Documents. In: Bartenstein, O., Geske, U., Hannebauer, M., Yoshie, O. (eds) Web Knowledge Management and Decision Support. INAP 2001. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 2543. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-36524-9_24

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-36524-9_24

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-00680-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-36524-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics