Skip to main content

Augmentative and Alternative Communication: The Future of Text on the Move

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 2615))

Abstract

The current methods available for text entry on small mobile devices suffer from poor performance which presents a potential barrier to acceptance and growth. Our analysis of mobile text entry indicates that the likely solution lies in aggressive use of language technology which is beyond the capabilities of current mobile devices. We argue that research in augmentative and alternative communication is highly relevant to the mobile text entry problem and offers the opportunity to research solutions that will be possible on future generations of mobile devices. Fewer input buttons, Natural Language Prosessing (NLP) and multimodal inputs are techniques applied in our design.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Smoreda, Z., Thomas, F. “Use of SMS in Europe”, analysis of data from EURESCOM P903 study “Cross-cultural attitudes to ICT in everyday life” performed October to December 2000, http://www.eurescom.de/~ftproot/web-deliverables/public/P900-series/P903/sms_use/w1-sms.html, verified 17. April 2002

  2. MacKenzie, S., Zhang, Shawn X., “An Empirical Investigation of the Novice Experience With Soft Keyboards” Behaviour & Information Technology, 20, 411–418

    Google Scholar 

  3. James, Christina L.; Reischel, Kelly M. “Text Input for Mobile Devices: Comparing Model Prediction to Actual Performance”, SIGCHI’01 March 31–April 4, 2001, pp. 365–371, Seattle, WA, USA

    Google Scholar 

  4. Silfverberg, Miika; MacKenzie, I. Scott; Korhonen, Panu “Predicting Text Entry Speed on Mobile Phones”, Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems-CHI 2000, pp. 9–16, New York: ACM

    Google Scholar 

  5. MacKenzie, I. Scott; Zhang, S. “The Immediate Usability of Graffiti” Proceedings of Graphics Interface’ 97, pp. 129–137, Toronto: Canadian Information Processing Society

    Google Scholar 

  6. Soukoreff, R. William; MacKenzie, Scott I. “Theoretical Upper and Lower Bounds on Typing Speed Using a Stylus and Soft Keyboard”, Behavior & Information Technology 14, 1995, pp. 370–379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Zhai, Shumin; Hunter, Michael; Smith, Barton A. “The Metropolis Keyboard — An Exploration of Quantitative Techniques for Virtual Keyboard Design” Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST 2000), November 5-8, 2000, pp. 119–128, San Diego, California

    Google Scholar 

  8. Matias, E.; MacKenzie, I. S., & Buxton, W. “Half-QWERTY: A one-handed keyboard facilitating skill transfer from QWERTY” Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems — INTERCHI’ 93, pp. 88–94. New York: ACM

    Google Scholar 

  9. Jecker, Diane “Benchmark tests: Speech Recognition” PC Magazine, november 1999, http://www.zdnet.com/products/stories/reviews/0,4161,2385302,00.html verified 17. April 2002

  10. A. T. Kearney/Judge Institute of Management “Mobinet Index # 4”, February 2002, http://www.atkearney.com/pdf/eng/Mobinet_4_S.pdf verified 17. April 2002

  11. Bellman, T.; MacKenzie, I. S. “A probabilistic character layout strategy for mobile text entry” Proceedings of Graphics Interface’ 98, pp. 168–176. Toronto: Canadian Information Processing Society

    Google Scholar 

  12. Levine, Simon P.; Gauger, John R. D; Bowers, Lisa D.; Kahn, Karen J.: “A comparison of Mouthstick and Morse Code Text Inputs”, Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 1(2), 1986, pp. 51–55, Decker Periodicals Inc., Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. International Telecommunication Union recommendation E.161, available from http://www.itu.int

  14. Lesher, G.W.; Moulton, B.J.,; Higginbotham, D.J.. “Techniques for augmenting scanning communication” Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 14, 1998, pp. 81–101, Decker Periodicals Inc., Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Fitts, P. M. “The Information Capacity of the Human Motor System in Controlling the Amplitude of Movement” Journal of Experimental Psychology 47, 1954, pp. 381–391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hick, W. E. “On the Rate of Gain of Information” Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 4, 1952, pp. 11–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Hyman, R “Stimulus Information as a Determinant of Reaction Time” Journal of Experimental Psychology, 45, 1953, pp. 188–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Shannon, C. E: “Prediction and Entropy of Printed English”e Bell Systems Technical Journal 30, January 1951, pp. 50–64

    Google Scholar 

  19. Rosenfeld, R “A Maximum Entropy Approach to Adaptive Statistical Language Modelling” Computer, Speech and Language, 10, 1996, pp. 187–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Tilbourg, H “An Introduction to Cryptology”, 1988, Kluwer Academic Publishers

    Google Scholar 

  21. Ward, David J. “Adaptive Computer Interfaces”, Ph.D.-thesis, Inference Group, Cavendish Laboratory, University of Cambridge, November 2001, http://www.inference.phy.cam.ac.uk/djw30/ verified 17. April 2002

  22. Marcus, Aaron “Babyface Design for Mobile Devices and the Web” Proceedings, Vol. 2, Human-Computer Interface Internat. (HCII) Conf., 5-10 Aug., 2001, pp. 514–518, New Orleans, LA, USA, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ USA

    Google Scholar 

  23. Gutowitz, Howard “Barriers to Adoption of Dictionary-Based Text-Entry Methods: A Field Study”, submitted to CHI2002, September 2001 http://www.eatoni.com/research/field-study.pdf verified 17. April 2002

  24. Schneiderman, Ben “Designing the User Interface: Strategies for Effective Human-Computer Interaction”, 2. edition, 1992, Addison-Wesley Publishing Company

    Google Scholar 

  25. Dvorak, A.; Merrick, W. L.; Ford, G. C. “Typewriting Behaviour”, 1936, New York: American Book Company

    Google Scholar 

  26. Wiklund, M. E; Dumas, J. S.; Hoffman, L. R. “Optimizing a Portable Terminal Keyboard for Combined One-Handed and Two-Handed Use” Proceedings of the Human Factors Society — 31st annual Meeting 1987, pp. 585–589, Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors Society

    Google Scholar 

  27. Hansen, Paulin J.; Witzner, Dan; Johansen, Anders S. “Bringing Gaze-based Interaction Back to Basics” Proceedings of Universal Access in Human-Computer Interaction (UAHCI 2001), New Orleans, Louisiana

    Google Scholar 

  28. Krug, Steve “Don’t Make me Think”, 2000, Que

    Google Scholar 

  29. Jordan, Patrick W. “An Introduction to Usability”, 1999, Taylor & Francis, London

    Google Scholar 

  30. Kühn, Michael; Garbe, Jörn “Predictive and Highly Ambiguous Typing for a Severely Speech and Motion Impaired User” Universal Access in Human-Computer Interaction. Proc. of UAHCI 2001, New Orleans, August, 5-10. Mahwah (NJ): Lawrence Erlbaum Associates

    Google Scholar 

  31. Miniotas, Darius “Application of fitts’ law to eye gaze interaction” CHI 2000 Extended Abstracts, pp. 339–340, 2000, New York, ACM

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Johansen, A.S., Hansen, J.P. (2003). Augmentative and Alternative Communication: The Future of Text on the Move. In: Carbonell, N., Stephanidis, C. (eds) Universal Access Theoretical Perspectives, Practice, and Experience. UI4ALL 2002. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2615. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-36572-9_33

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-36572-9_33

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-00855-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-36572-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics