Skip to main content

Solving Hierarchical Optimization Problems Using MOEAs

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Evolutionary Multi-Criterion Optimization (EMO 2003)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 2632))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

In this paper, we propose an approach for solving hierarchical multi-objective optimization problems (MOPs). In realistic MOPs, two main challenges have to be considered: (i) the complexity of the search space and (ii) the non-monotonicity of the objective-space. Here, we introduce a hierarchical problem description (chromosomes) to deal with the complexity of the search space. Since Evolutionary Algorithms have been proven to provide good solutions in non-monotonic objective-spaces, we apply genetic operators also on the structure of hierarchical chromosomes. This novel approach decreases exploration time substantially. The example of system synthesis is used as a case study to illustrate the necessity and the benefits of hierarchical optimization.

This work was supported in part by the German Science Foundation (DFG), SPP 1040.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Josephson, J.R., Chandrasekaran, B., Carroll, M., Iyer, N., Wasacz, B., Rizzoni, G., Li, Q., Erb, D.A.: An Architecture for Exploring Large Design Spaces. In: Proc. of the Nat. Conference of AI (AAAI-98), Madison, Wisconsin (1998) 143–150

    Google Scholar 

  2. Abraham, S.G., Rau, B.R., Schreiber, R.: Fast Design Space Exploration Through Validity and Quality Filtering of Subsystem Designs. Technical report, Hewlett Packard, Compiler and Architecture Research, HP Laboratories Palo Alto (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Rudolph, G., Agapie, A.: Convergence Properties of Some Multi-Objective Evolutionary Algorithms. In: Proc. of the 2000 Congress on Evolutionary Computation, Piscataway, NJ, IEEE Service Center (2000) 1010–1016

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Dasgupta, D., McGregor, D.R.: Nonstationary Function Optimization using the Structured Genetic Algorithm. In Männer, R., Manderick, B., eds.: Proceedings of Parallel Problem Solving from Nature (PPSN 2), Brussels, Belgium, Elsevier Science (1992) 145–154

    Google Scholar 

  5. Blickle, T., Teich, J., Thiele, L.: System-Level Synthesis Using Evolutionary Algorithms. In Gupta, R., ed.: Design Automation for Embedded Systems. 3. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston (1998) 23–62

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dick, R., Jha, N.: MOGAC: A Multiobjective Genetic Algorithm for Hardware-Software Cosynthesis of Distributed Embedded Systems. In: IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems 17(10). (1998) 920–935

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Pareto, V.: Cours d’Économie Politique. Volume 1. F. Rouge & Cie., Lausanne, Switzerland (1896)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Thiele, L., Chakraborty, S., Gries, M., Künzli, S.: A Framework for Evaluating Design Tradeoffs in Packet Processing Architectures. In: Proceedings of the 39th Design Automation Conference (DAC 2002). (2002) 880–885

    Google Scholar 

  9. Teich, J., Haubelt, C., Mostaghim, S., Slomka, F., Tyagi, A.: Techniques for Hierarchical Design Space Exploration and their Application on System Synthesis. Technical Report 1/2002, Institute Date, Department of EE and IT, University of Paderborn, Paderborn, Germany (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Zitzler, E., Laumanns, M., Thiele, L.: SPEA2: Improving the Strength Pareto Evolutionary Algorithm. Technical report, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH) Zurich (2001) TIK-Report 103. Department of Electrical Engineering.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Haubelt, C., Teich, J., Richter, K., Ernst, R.: Flexibility/Cost-Tradeoffs in Platform-Based Design. In Deprettere, E., Teich, J., Vassiliadis, S., eds.: Embedded Processor Design Challenges. Volume 2268 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science (LNCS)., Berlin, Heidelberg, Springer (2002) 38–56

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Deb, K.: Multi-Objective Optimization Using Evolutionary Algorithms. John Wiley & Sons (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Zitzler, E.: Evolutionary Algorithms for Multiobjective Optimization: Methods and Applications. PhD thesis, Department of Electrical Engineering, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH) Zurich (1999)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Haubelt, C., Mostaghim, S., Teich, J., Tyagi, A. (2003). Solving Hierarchical Optimization Problems Using MOEAs. In: Fonseca, C.M., Fleming, P.J., Zitzler, E., Thiele, L., Deb, K. (eds) Evolutionary Multi-Criterion Optimization. EMO 2003. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2632. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-36970-8_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-36970-8_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-01869-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-36970-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics