Skip to main content

Dissecting Distributed Computations

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Future Directions in Distributed Computing

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 2584))

  • 560 Accesses

Abstract

Beginning with the earliest assembly languages, programming even simple centralised and sequential applications was very cumbersome. Major advances in computing came with the adoption of programming languages that promoted the use of machine independent data abstractions like sets, arrays, and records, as well as control abstractions like while, ifand repeat. With the arrival of parallel machines and multi-threading, the need for additional abstractions that factor out the difficulty of concurrent computing has driven several research activities. These activities resulted in new abstractions like semaphores, monitors and rendez-vous. Not very long ago, these abstractions used to sit beside programming languages in the form of libraries, e.g., concurrency libraries in C++. They have now been integrated as first class citizens into modern programming languages, e.g., through synchronised methods in Java. Despite the many decades of research in distributed computing, abstractions for programming distributed applications are still lacking. Currently, the only abstraction that is of a relatively wide use in distributed programming is the RPC (Remote Procedure Call) [13.1]. Surprisingly enough, RPC actually aims at hiding distribution: the goal of RPC is to make an invocation of a remote object looks like the invocation of a local object. This illusion is however broken when the remote object is located on a machine that crashes or that becomes inaccessible because of a link failure [13.2].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. A. Birell and B. Nelson. Implementing Remote Procedure Call. ACM Transactions on Computer Systems, February 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  2. K. Birman and R. van Renesse. RPC Considered Inadequate. In Reliable Distributed Computing with the Isis Toolkit. K. Birman and R. van Renesse (eds). IEEE Computer Society Press. 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  3. R. Boichat, P. Dutta, S. Frolund and R. Guerraoui. Deconstructing Paxos. DSC-EPFL Tech-Report 2001-06.

    Google Scholar 

  4. T. Chandra and S. Toueg. Unreliable Failure Detectors for Reliable Distributed Systems. Journal of the ACM, 43(2), March 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  5. T. Chandra, V. Hadzilacos and S. Toueg. The Weakest Failure Detector for Solving Consensus. Journal of the ACM, 43(4), July 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  6. T. Chandra, V. Hadzilacos and S. Toueg. On the Impossibility of Group Membership.ACM Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing (PODC), 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  7. G. Chockler and D. Malkhi. Active Disk Paxos with Infinitely Many Processes.ACMSymposium on Principles of Distributed Computing (PODC), 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  8. R. De Prisco, B. Lampson and N. Lynch. Revisiting the Paxos Algorithm. Theoretical Computer Science, 243(1–2), 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  9. P. Dutta, S. Frolund, R. Guerraoui and B. Pochon. An Effiicient Lightweight Universal Construction in a MessagePassing System. International Symposium on Distributed Computing (DISC), Springer Verlag (LNCS), 2002.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. P. Dutta and R. Guerraoui. The Inherent Price of Indulgence. ACM Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing (PODC), 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  11. C. Dwork, N. Lynch and L. Stockmeyer. Consensus in the Presence of Partial Synchrony. Journal of the ACM, 35 (2), 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  12. M. Fischer, N. Lynch and M. Paterson. Impossibility of Distributed Consensus with One Faulty Process. Journal of the ACM, 32(2), 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  13. S. Frolund and R. Guerraoui.X-ability: A Theory of Replication. Distributed Computing, 14:231–249, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  14. E. Gafni and L. Lamport. Disk Paxos. International Symposium on Distributed Computing (DISC), Springer Verlag (LNCS), 2000.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. R. Guerraoui. What object-oriented distributed programming does not have to be, and what it may be. Informatik 2, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  16. R. Guerraoui. Indulgent Algorithms. ACM Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing (PODC), 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  17. R. Guerraoui and A. Schiper. The Generic Consensus Service. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 27 (1), 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  18. M. Herlihy. Wait-Free Synchronisation. ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems, 13 (1), 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  19. C. Hewitt. Viewing Control Structures as Patterns of Passing Messages. Artificial Intelligence, (8), 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  20. L. Lamport. The Part-Time Parliament. ACM Transactions on Computer Systems, 16 (2), 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  21. B. Liskov and R. Scheifier. Guardians and Actions: Linguistic Support for Robust Distributed Programs. ACM Symposium on Principles of Programming Languages (POPL), February 1986.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Guerraoui, R. (2003). Dissecting Distributed Computations. In: Schiper, A., Shvartsman, A.A., Weatherspoon, H., Zhao, B.Y. (eds) Future Directions in Distributed Computing. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2584. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-37795-6_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-37795-6_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-00912-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-37795-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics