Abstract
Software systems are increasingly being built by integrating preexisting components developed by different, geographically distributed organizations. Each component typically evolves independently over time, not only in terms of its functionality, but also in terms of its exposed interfaces and dependencies on other components. Given that those other components may also evolve, creating an application by assembling sets of components typically involves managing a complex web of evolving dependencies. Traditional configuration management systems assume a form of centralized control that simply does not suffice in these situations. Needed are new configuration management systems that span multiple organizations, operate in a distributed and decentralized fashion, and help in managing the consistent evolution of independently developed, inter-related sets of components. A critical aspect of these new configuration management systems is that they must respect the different levels of autonomy, privacy, and trust that exist among different organizations. In this paper, we introduce TWICS, an early example of such a new configuration management system. Key aspects of TWICS are that it maintains traditional configuration management functionality to support the development of individual components, but integrates policy-driven deployment functionality to support different organizations in evolving their inter-related components.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
E.C. Bailey, Maximum RPM. Red Hat Software Inc., 1997
B. Berliner. CVS II: Parallelizing Software Development. Proceedings of the USENIX Winter 1990 Technical Conference, 1990: p. 341–352
C. Burrows and I. Wesley, Ovum Evaluates Configuration Management. Ovum Ltd., Burlington, Massachussetts, 1998
ComponentSource, http://www.componentsource.com/ , 2002
R. Conradi and B. Westfechtel, Version Models for Software Configuration Management. ACM Computing Surveys, 1998. 30(2): p. 232–282
M. de Jonge. Source Tree Composition. Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Software Reuse, 2002
L.G. DeMichiel, L.U. Yalcinalp, and S. Krishnan, Enterprise Java Beans Specification, Version 2.0, http://java.sun.com/products/ejb/docs.html , 2001
J. Estublier and R. Casalles, The Adele Configuration Manager, in Configuration Management, W.F. Tichy, Editor. 1994: p. 99–134
P.H. Feiler. Configuration Management Models in Commercial Environments. Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, 1991
R.S. Hall, D.M. Heimbigner, and A.L. Wolf. A Cooperative Approach to Support Software Deployment Using the Software Dock. Proceedings of the 1999 International Conference on Software Engineering, 1999: p. 174–183
InstallShield, http://www.installshield.com/ , 2001
M. Larsson and I. Crnkovic. Configuration Management for Component-based Systems. Proceedings of the Tenth International Workshop on Software Configuration Management, 2001
M.D. McIlroy, Mass Produced Software Components. Software Engineering: A Report on a Conference Sponsored by the NATO Science Committee, P. Naur and B. Randell (eds.), 1968: p. 138–155
T. Mens, A State-of-the-Art Survey on Software Merging. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 2002. 28(5): p. 449–462
NetDeploy, http://www.netdeploy.com/ , 2001
J. Oberleitner. The Component Workbench: A Flexible Component Composition Environment. M.S. Thesis, Technische Universität Vienna, 2001
Object Management Group, ed. The Common Object Request Broker: Architecture and Specification. 2001, Object Management Group
D.S. Platt, Introducing Microsoft Dot-Net. Microsoft, Redmond, 2001
Red Hat, http://www.rpm.org/ , 2001
J. Rumbaugh, I. Jacobson, and G. Booch, The Unified Modeling Language Reference Manual. Addison-Wesley, 1998
C. Szyperski, Component Software — Beyond Object-Oriented Programming. Addison-Wesley / ACM Press, 1998
Telelogic, CM/Synergy, http://www.telelogic.com/products/synergy/cmsynergy/index.cfm , 2002
W.F. Tichy, RCS, A System for Version Control. Software — Practice and Experience, 1985. 15(7): p. 637–654
Tigris.org, Subversion, http://subversion.tigris.org/ , 2002
Tivoli Systems, http://www.tivoli.com/ , 2001
V. Traas and J. van Hillegersberg, The Software Component Market on the Internet: Current Status and Conditions for Growth. Software Engineering Notes, 2000. 25(1): p. 114–117
E. Tryggeseth, B. Gulla, and R. Conradi. Modelling Systems with Variability Using the PROTEUS Configuration Language. Proceedings of the International Workshop on Software Configuration Management: ICSE SCM-4 and SCM-5 Workshops Selected Papers, 1995: p. 216–240
A. van der Hoek, et al. Software Release Management. Proceedings of the Sixth European Software Engineering Conference together with the Fifth ACM SIGSOFT Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering, 1997: p. 159–175
D. Wiborg Weber. Requirements for an SCM Architecture to Enable Componentbased Development. Proceedings of the Tenth International Workshop on Software Configuration Management, 2001
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2003 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Sowrirajan, S., van der Hoek, A. (2003). Managing the Evolution of Distributed and Interrelated Components. In: Westfechtel, B., van der Hoek, A. (eds) Software Configuration Management. SCM SCM 2001 2003. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2649. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-39195-9_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-39195-9_16
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-14036-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-39195-1
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive