Skip to main content

Analysis and Results of the 1999 DARPA Off-Line Intrusion Detection Evaluation

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Recent Advances in Intrusion Detection (RAID 2000)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 1907))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Eight sites participated in the second DARPA off-line intrusion detection evaluation in 1999. Three weeks of training and two weeks of test data were generated on a test bed that emulates a small government site. More than 200 instances of 58 attack types were launched against victim UNIX and Windows NT hosts. False alarm rates were low (less than 10 per day). Best detection was provided by network-based systems for old probe and old denial-of-service (DoS) attacks and by host-based systems for Solaris user-to-root (U2R) attacks. Best overall performance would have been provided by a combined system that used both host- and network-based intrusion detection. Detection accuracy was poor for previously unseen new, stealthy, and Windows NT attacks. Ten of the 58 attack types were completely missed by all systems. Systems missed attacks because protocols and TCP services were not analyzed at all or to the depth required, because signatures for old attacks did not generalize to new attacks, and because auditing was not available on all hosts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. E. G. Amoroso, Intrusion Detection: An Introduction to Internet Surveillance, Correlation, Trace Back, Traps, and Response, Intrusion.Net Books, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  2. K. Das, The Development of Stealthy Attacks to Evaluate Intrusion Detection Systems, S. M. Thesis, MIT Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, June 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  3. R. Durst, Terrence Champion, Brian Witten, Eric Miller and Luigi Spagnuolo, Testing and evaluating computer intrusion detection systems, Communications of the ACM, 42, 1999, 53–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. A. K. Ghosh and A. Schwartzbard, A Study in Using Neural Networks for Anomaly and Misuse Detection, in Proceedings of the USENIX Security Symposium, August 23–26, 1999, Washington, D.C, http://www.rstcorp.com/~anup.

  5. T. Heberlein, T., Network Security Monitor (NSM)-Final Report, U. C. Davis: February 1995, http://seclab.cs.ucdavis.edu/papers/NSM-final.pdf

  6. K. Jackson, Intrusion Detection System (IDS) Product Survey, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Report LA-UR-99-3883, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  7. S. Jajodia, D. Barbara, B. Speegle, and N. Wu, Audit Data Analysis and Mining (ADAM), project described in http://www.isse.gmu.edu/~dbarbara/adam.html, April, 2000.

  8. K. Kendall, A Database of Computer Attacks for the Evaluation of Intrusion Detection Systems, S. M. Thesis, MIT Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, June 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  9. J. Korba, Windows NT Attacks for the Evaluation of Intrusion Detection Systems, S. M. Thesis, MIT Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, June 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Network Research Group provides tcp-dump at http://www-nrg.ee.lbl.gov.

  11. R. P. Lippmann, Joshua W. Haines, David J. Fried, Jonathan Korba, and Kumar Das, The 1999 DARPA Off-Line Intrusion Detection Evaluation, Computer Networks, In Press, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  12. R. P. Lippmann, David J. Fried, Isaac Graf, Joshua W. Haines, Kristopher R. Kendall, David McClung, Dan Weber, Seth E. Webster, Dan Wyschogrod, Robert K. Cunningham, and Marc A. Zissman, Evaluating Intrusion Detection Systems: the 1998 DARPA Off-Line Intrusion Detection Evaluation, in Proceedings of the 2000 DARPA Information Survivability Conference and Exposition (DISCEX), Vol. 2, IEEE Press, January 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  13. R. P. Lippmann and R. K. Cunningham, Guide to Creating Stealthy Attacks for the 1999 DARPA Off-Line Intrusion Detection Evaluation, MIT Lincoln Laboratory Project Report IDDE-1, June 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  14. MIT Lincoln Laboratory, A public web site http://www.ll.mit.edu/IST/ideval/index.html, contains limited information on the 1998 and 1999 evaluations. Follow instructions on this web site or send email to the authors (rpl or jhaines@sst.ll.mit.edu) to obtain access to a password-protected site with more complete information on these evaluations and results. Software scripts to execute attacks are not provided on these or other web sites.

  15. P. Neumann and P. Porras, Experience with EMERALD to DATE, in Proceedings 1st USENIX Workshop on Intrusion Detection and Network Monitoring, Santa Clara, California, April 1999, 73–80, http://www.sdl.sri.com/emerald/index.html.

  16. S. Northcutt, Network Intrusion Detection; An Analysis Handbook, New Riders Publishing, Indianapolis, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  17. V. Paxson, “Empirically-Derived Analytic Models of Wide-Area TCP Connections”, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, Vol. 2, No. 4, August, 1994, ftp://ftp.ee.lbl.gov/papers/WAN-TCP-models.ps.Z.

  18. T. H. Ptacek and T. N. Newsham, Insertion, Evasion, and Denial of Service: Eluding Network Intrusion Detection, Secure Networks, Inc. Report, January 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  19. N. Puketza, M. Chung, R. A. Olsson, and B. Mukherjee, A Software Platform for Testing Intrusion Detection Systems, IEEE Software, September/October, 1997, 43–51.

    Google Scholar 

  20. A. Schwartzbard and A. K. Ghosh, A Study in the Feasibility of Performing Hostbased Anomaly Detection on Windows NT, in Proceedings of the 2nd Recent Advances in Intrusion Detection (RAID 1999) Workshop, West Lafayette, IN, September 7–9, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  21. R. Sekar and P. Uppuluri, Synthesizing Fast Intrusion Prevention/Detection Systems from High-Level Specifications, in Proceedings 8th Usenix Security Symposium, Washington DC, Aug. 1999, http://rcs-sgi.cs.iastate.edu/sekar/abs/usenixsec99.htm.

  22. M. Tyson, P. Berry, N. Williams, D. Moran, D. Blei, DERBI: Diagnosis, Explanation and Recovery from computer Break-Ins, project described in http://www.ai.sri.com/~derbi/, April. 2000.

  23. G. Vigna, S. T. Eckmann, and R. A. Kemmerer, The STAT Tool Suite, in Proceedings of the 2000 DARPA Information Survivability Conference and Exposition (DISCEX), IEEE Press, January 2000.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Lippmann, R., Haines, J.W., Fried, D.J., Korba, J., Das, K. (2000). Analysis and Results of the 1999 DARPA Off-Line Intrusion Detection Evaluation. In: Debar, H., Mé, L., Wu, S.F. (eds) Recent Advances in Intrusion Detection. RAID 2000. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1907. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-39945-3_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-39945-3_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-41085-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-39945-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics