Skip to main content

Can Relational Learning Scale Up?

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 1932))

Abstract

A key step of supervised learning is testing whether a can- didate hypothesis covers a given example. When learning in first order logic languages, the covering test is equivalent to a Constraint Satisfaction Problem (CSP). For critical values of some order parameters, CSPs present a phase pransition, that is, the probability of finding a solution abruptly drops from almost 1 to almost 0, and the complexity drama- tically increases. This paper analyzes the complexity and feasibility of learning in first order logic languages with respect to the phase transition of the covering test.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. M. Botta, A. Giordana, and L. Saitta. Relational learning: Hard problems and phase transitions. In Proceedings of th 16th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 1198–1203, Stockholm, Sweden, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  2. M. Botta, A. Giordana, L. Saitta, and M. Sebag. Relational learning: Hard problems and phase transition. In Selected papers from AIIA’99, volume to appear. Springer-Verlag, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  3. A. Giordana and L. Saitta. Phase transitions in relational learning. Machine Learning, x:to appear, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  4. T. Hogg, B.A. Huberman, and C.P. Williams, editors. Artificial Intelligence: Special Issue on Frontiers in Problem Solving: Phase Transitions and Complexity, volume 81(1-2). Elsevier, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

    Google Scholar 

  5. S. Muggleton and L. De Raedt. Inductive logic programming: Theory and methods. Journal of Logic Programming, 19:629–679, 1994.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. P. Prosser. An empirical study of phase transitions in binary constraint satisfaction problems. Artificial Intelligence, 81:81–110, 1996.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. R. Quinlan. Learning logical definitions from relations. Machine Learning, 5:239–266, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  8. J. Rissanen. Modeling by shortest data description. Automatica, 14:465–471, 1978.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Giordana, A., Saitta, L., Sebag, M., Botta, M. (2000). Can Relational Learning Scale Up?. In: Raś, Z.W., Ohsuga, S. (eds) Foundations of Intelligent Systems. ISMIS 2000. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 1932. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-39963-1_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-39963-1_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-41094-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-39963-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics