Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 1937))

Abstract

Currently computers are changing from single isolated devices into entry points into a worldwide network of information exchange and business transactions. Support in data, information, and knowledge exchange is becoming the key issue in current computer technology. Ontologies will play a major role in supporting information exchange processes in various areas. A prerequisite for such a role is the development of a joint standard for specifying and exchanging ontologies. The purpose of the paper is precisely concerned with this necessity. We will present OIL, which is a proposal for such a standard. It is based on existing proposals such as OKBC, XOL and RDF schema, enriching them with necessary features for expressing ontologies. The paper sketches the main ideas of OIL.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. C. Areces, P. Blackburn, and M. Marx: A road-map on complexity for hybrid logics. In Proc. of CSL’99, number 1683 in LNCS, pages 307–321. Springer-Verlag, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  2. F. Baader, H.-J. Heinsohn, B. Hollunder, J. Muller, B. Nebel, W. Nutt, and H.-J. Profitlich: Terminological knowledge representation: A proposal for a terminological logic. Technical Memo TM-90-04, Deutsches Forschungszentrum für Künstliche Intelligenz GmbH (DFKI), 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  3. F. Baader and P. Hanschke: A Scheme for Integrating Concrete Domains into Concept Languages. In Proceddings IJCAI91, 1991: 452–457.

    Google Scholar 

  4. F. Baader and B. Hollunder: KRIS: Knowledge representation and inference system. SIGART Bulletin, 2(3):8–14, 1991.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. S. Bechhofer, I. Horrocks, P. F. Patel-Schneider, and S. Tessaris: A proposal for a description logic interface. In Proc. of DL’99, pages 33–36, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  6. A. Borgida and P. F. Patel-Schneider: A semantics and complete algorithm for subsumption in the CLASSIC description logic. J. of Artificial Intelligence Research, 1:277–308, 1994.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. R. J. Brachman and J. G. Schmolze: An overview of the KL-ONE knowledge representation system. Cognitive Science, 9(2):171–216, 1985.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. D. Brickley and R.V. Guha: Resource Description Framework (RDF) Schema Specification 1.0, W3C Candidate Recommendation 27 March 2000. http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/CR-rdfschema-20000327.

  9. V. K. Chaudhri, A. Farquhar, R. Fikes, P. D. Karp, and J. P. Rice: Open knowledge base connectivity 2.0. Technical Report KSL-98-06, Knowledge Systems Laboratory, Stanford, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  10. V. K. Chaudhri, A. Farquhar, R. Fikes, P. D. Karp, and J. P. Rice: OKBC: A programmatic foundation for knowledge base interoperability. In Proceedings of the 15th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-98) and of the 10th Conference on Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence (IAAI-98), pages 600–607. AAAI Press, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  11. H. Eriksson, R. W. Fergerson, Y. Shahar, and M. A. Musen: Automated Generation of Ontology Editors. In Proceedings of the Twelfth Workshop on Knowledge Acquisition, Modeling and Management (KAW99), Banff, Alberta, Canada, October 16–21, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  12. A. Farquhar, R. Fikes, and J. Rice: The ontolingua server: A tool for collaborative ontology construction. Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 46:707–728, 1997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. D. Fensel. Ontologies: Silver Bullet for Knowledge Management and Electronic Commerce. Springer-Verlag, to appear.

    Google Scholar 

  14. D. Fensel, S. Decker, M. Erdmann und R. Studer: Ontobroker: The Very High Idea. In Proceedings of the 11th International Flairs Conference (FLAIRS-98), Sanibal Island, Florida, USA, 131–135, Mai 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  15. D. Fensel, J. Angele, and R. Studer: The Knowledge Acquisition And Representation Language KARL, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 10(4):527–550, 1998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. D. Fensel, J. Angele, S. Decker, M. Erdmann, H.-P. Schnurr, S. Staab, R. Studer, and A. Witt: On2broker: Semantic-Based Access to Information Sources at the WWW. In Proceedings of the World Conference on the WWW and Internet (WebNet 99), Honolulu, Hawaii, USA, October 25–30, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  17. D. Fensel, M. Crubezy, F. van Harmelen, and M. I. Horrocks: OIL & UPML: A Unifying Framework for the Knowledge Web. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Applications of Ontologies and Problem-solving Methods, 14th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence ECAI’00, Berlin, Germany August 20–25, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Foundation for Intelligent Physical Agents (FIPA): FIPA 98 Specification, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  19. M. R. Genesereth: Knowledge interchange format. In J. Allen, R. Fikes, and E. Sandewall, editors, Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning: Proceedings of the Second International Conference (KR’91). clMorgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Francisco, California, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  20. M.R. Genesereth and R.E. Fikes: Knowledge interchange format, version 3.0, reference manual. Technical Report Logic-92-1, Computer Science Dept., Stanford University, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  21. A. Gomez Perez and V. R. Benjamins: Applications of ontologies and problem-solving methods. AI-Magazine, 20(1):119–122, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  22. W. E. Grosso, H. Eriksson, R. W. Fergerson, H. Gennari, S. W. Tu, and M. A. Musen: Knowledge Modeling at the Millennium (The Design and Evolution of Protégé-2000). In Proceedings of the Twelfth Workshop on Knowledge Acquisition, Modeling and Management (KAW99), Banff, Alberta, Canada, October 16–21, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  23. T. R. Gruber: A translation approach to portable ontology specifications. Knowledge Acquisition, 5(2), 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  24. R. Guenther: Type Working Group List of Resource Types 1999-08-05. http://www.purl.org/DC/documents/wd-typelist.htm

  25. G. van Heijst, A. Th. Schreiber, and B. J. Wielinga: Using explicit ontologies in KBS development. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 46(2/3):183–292, 1997.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. J. Heflin, J. Hendler, and S. Luke: SHOE: A Knowledge Representation Language for Internet Applications. Technical Report, CS-TR-4078 (UMIACS TR-99-71), Dept. of Computer Science, University of Maryland at College Park. 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  27. I. Horrocks, D. Fensel, J. Broekstra, S. Decker, M. Erdmann, C. Goble, F. Van Harmelen, M. Klein, S. Staab, and R. Studer: The Ontology Inference Layer OIL. http://www.ontoknowledge.org/oil.

  28. I. Horrocks and P. F. Patel-Schneider: Optimising description logic subsumption. Journal of Logic and Computation, 9(3):267–293, 1999.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  29. P. D. Karp, V. K. Chaudhri, and J. Thomere: XOL: An XML-based ontology exchange language. Version 0.3, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  30. M. Klein, D. Fensel, F. van Harmelen, and I. Horrocks: The Relation between Ontologies and Schema-Languages: Translating OIL-Specifications to XML-Schema. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Applications of Ontologies and Problem-solving Methods, 14th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence ECAI’00, Berlin, Germany August 20–25, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  31. O. Lassila and R. Swick: Resource description framework (RDF). W3C recommendation. http://www.w3c.org/TR/WD-rdf-syntax, 1999.

  32. S. Luke, L. Spector, and D. Rager: Ontology-Based Knowledge Discovery on the World-Wide Web. In Working Notes of the Workshop on Internet-Based Information Systems at the 13th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI96), 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  33. R. McEntire, P. Karp, N. Abernethy, F. Olken, R. E. Kent, M. De Jongh, P. Tarczy-Hornoch, D. Benton, D. Pathak, G. Helt, S. Lewis, A. Kosky, E. Neumann, D. Hodnett, L. Tolda, and T. Topaloglou: An evaluation of ontology exchange languages for bioinformatics, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  34. R. M. MacGregor: A description classifier for the predicate calculus. In Proceedings of the Twelfth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 213–220, Seattle, Washington, USA, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  35. E. Miller: An introduction to the resource description framework. D-Lib Magazine, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  36. E. Miller, P. Miller, and D. Brickley: Guidance on expressing the Dublin Core within the Resource Description Framework (RDF). http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/metadata/resources/dc/datamodel/WD-dc-rdf.

  37. B. Nebel: Artificial intelligence: A computational perspective. In G. Brewka, editor, Principles of Knowledge Representation, Studies in Logic, Language and Information. CSLI publications, Stanford, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  38. P. F. Patel-Schneider and B. Swartout: Description logic specification from the KRSS effort, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  39. A. L. Rector, W A Nowlan, and A Glowinski: Goals for concept representation in the GALEN project. In Proceedings of the 17th Annual Symposium on Computer Applications in Medical Care (SCAMC’93), pages 414–418, Washington DC, USA, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  40. A. Rector, S. Bechhofer, C. A. Goble, I. Horrocks, W. A. Nowlan, and W. D. Solomon: The GRAIL concept modelling language for medical terminology. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, 9:139–171, 1997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. U. Sattler: A concept language for engineering applications with part-whole relations. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Description Logics-DL’95, pages 119–123, Roma, Italy, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  42. M. Uschold and M. Grüninger: Ontologies: Principles, methods and applications. Knowledge Engineering Review, 11(2), 1996.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Fensel, D., Horrocks, I., Van Harmelen, F., Decker, S., Erdmann, M., Klein, M. (2000). OIL in a Nutshell. In: Dieng, R., Corby, O. (eds) Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management Methods, Models, and Tools. EKAW 2000. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 1937. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-39967-4_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-39967-4_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-41119-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-39967-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics