Skip to main content

Simple Algorithms for a Weighted Interval Selection Problem

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Algorithms and Computation (ISAAC 2000)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 1969))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Given a set of jobs, each consisting of a number of weighted intervals on the real line, and a number m of machines, we study the problem of selecting a maximum weight subset of the intervals such that at most one interval is selected from each job and, for any point p on the real line, at most m intervals containing p are selected. This problem has applications in molecular biology, caching, PCB assembly, and scheduling. We give a parameterized algorithm GREEDYα and show that there are values of the parameterα so that GREEDYα produces a 1/2-approximation in the case of unit weights, a 1/8-approximation in the case of arbitrary weights, and a (3 - 2p2)-approximation in the case where the weights of all intervals corresponding to the same job are equal. Algorithm GREEDYα belongs to the class of “myopic” algorithms, which are deterministic algorithms that process the given intervals in order of non-decreasing right endpoints and can either reject or select each interval (rejections are irrevocable). We use competitive analysis to show that GREEDYα is an optimal myopic algorithm in the case of unit weights and in the case of equal weights per job, and is close to optimal in the case of arbitrary weights.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. G. Ausiello, P. Crescenzi, G. Gambosi, V. Kann, A. Marchetti-Spaccamela, and M. Protasi.Complexity and Approximation. Combinatorial Optimization Problems and their ApproximabilityProperties. Springer, Berlin, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  2. A. Bar-Noy, R. Bar-Yehuda, A. Freund, J. S. Naor, and B. Schieber. A unified approach toapproximating resource allocation and scheduling. In Proceedings of the 32nd Annual ACMSymposium on Theory of Computing STOC’00, pages 735–744, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  3. A. Bar-Noy, S. Guha, J. S. Naor, and B. Schieber. Approximating the throughput of multiplemachines under real-time scheduling. In Proceedings of the 31st Annual ACM Symposiumon Theory of Computing STOC’99, pages 622–631, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  4. P. Berman and B. DasGupta. Improvements in throughput maximization for real-time scheduling. In Proceedings of the 32nd Annual ACMSymposium on Theory of Computing STOC’00,pages 680–687, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  5. P. Berman, Z. Zhang, J. Bouck, and W. Miller. Aligning two fragmented sequences. Manuscript,1999.

    Google Scholar 

  6. M. C. Carlisle and E. L. Lloyd. On the k-coloring of intervals. Discrete Appl. Math., 59:225–235, 1995.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Y. Crama, O. Flippo, J. van de Klundert, and F. Spieksma. The assembly of printed circuitboards: a case with multiple machines and multiple board types. European Journal ofOperational Research, 98:457–472, 1997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. T. Erlebach and F. Spieksma. Simple algorithms for a weighted interval scheduling problem.Technical Report M00-01, Department of Mathematics, Maastricht University, April 2000.http://www.tik.ee.ethz.ch/_erlebach/Report-M00-01.ps.gz.

  9. S. A. Goldman, J. Parwatikar, and S. Suri. Online scheduling with hard deadlines. Journalof Algorithms, 34(2):370–389, 2000.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. M. H. Goldwasser. Patience is a virtue: The effect of slack on competitiveness for admissioncontrol. In Proceedings of the 10th Annual ACM‐SIAM Symposium on Discrete AlgorithmsSODA’99, pages 396–405, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  11. D. Hochbaum. Approximation algorithms for NP-hard problems. PWS Publishing Company,Boston, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  12. F. Spieksma. Onthe approximability of an interval scheduling problem. Journal of Scheduling,2:215–227, 1999.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Erlebach, T., Spieksma, F.C. (2000). Simple Algorithms for a Weighted Interval Selection Problem. In: Goos, G., Hartmanis, J., van Leeuwen, J., Lee, D.T., Teng, SH. (eds) Algorithms and Computation. ISAAC 2000. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1969. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-40996-3_20

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-40996-3_20

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-41255-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-40996-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics