Skip to main content

Dependence Based Coalitions and Contract Net: A Comparative Analysis

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 1952))

Abstract

Among several models of dynamic organizations, one can find Contract Net [14,4] and Dependence Based Coalitions [11,12,13] models. In this work, we present a comparative analysis of these models. More precisely, we compare the global communication flow of these two models, by changing some relevant parameters that have influence on the total number of exchanged messages. Our main goal is to be able to detect under which conditions one of the models is better than the other, concerning the global communication flow and the parameters values.

Partially supported by CNPq, grant number 301041/95-4.

This definition of agent is obviously vague and poor, and it is being used exclusively to stress some essential aspects of this section.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. BOND, A.H.; GASSER, L. Readings in Distributed Artificial Intelligence. Palo Alto, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, Inc.,1988.

    Google Scholar 

  2. CASTELFRANCHI, C.; MICELI, M.; CESTA, A. Dependence relations among autonomous agents. In: Werner, E.; Demazeau, Y editors, Decentralized A.I. 3-Third European Workshop on Modelling Autonomous Agents in a Multi-Agent World, Germany, 1991. Proceedings. Netherlands, Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., 1992, v.1, p. 215–227.

    Google Scholar 

  3. DAVID, N.; SICHMAN, J. S.; COELHO, H. Extending social reasoning to cope with multiple partner coalitions. In: Ninth European Workshop on Modelling Autonomous Agents in a Multi-Agent World. Proceedings.

    Google Scholar 

  4. DAVIS, R.; SMITH, R. G. Negotiation as a metaphor for distributed problem solving. Artificial Intelligence, v.20, p.63–109, 1983. apud [KRA93]

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. DECKER, K. Distributed problem-solving techniques: a survey. IEEE Transactions on System, Man and Cybernetics, v.17, p.729–740, 1987.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. HEWITT, C. E. Some requirements for mobile distributed telecomputing architecture. In Cristiano Castelfranchi and Eric Werner, editors, Artificial Social Systems, volume 830 of Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, pages 259–270. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, DE, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  7. ITO, M. Uma análise do fluxo de comunicação em organizações dinâmicas de agentes. São Paulo, 1999. 141 p. MsC Disseratation-Escola Politécnica da Univers-dade de São Paulo.

    Google Scholar 

  8. KRAUS, S. Agents contracting tasks in non-collaborative environments. In: 11th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Washington, 1993. Proceedings. Menlo Park, AAAI Press, 1993. p. 243–248.

    Google Scholar 

  9. ROSENSCHEIN, J.; ZLOTKIN, G. Rules of Encounter: Designing Conventions for Automated Negotiation among Computers. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  10. SANDHOLM, T. Agents in Eletronic Commerce: Component Technologies for Automated Negotiation and Coalition Formation. In: 3rd International Conference on Multi-Agent Systems. Paris, 1998. Proceedings. Los Alamitos, IEEE Computer Society, 1998. p. 10–11.

    Google Scholar 

  11. SICHMAN, J.S.; DEMAZEAU, Y.; CONTE, R.; CASTELFRANCHI, C. A social reasoning mechanism based on dependence networks. In Michael Huhns and Munindar Singh, editors, Readings on Agents, pages 416–420, San Francisco, CA, 1998. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  12. SICHMAN, J. S. Du Raisonnment Social Chez les Agents: Une Approche Fondée sur la Théorie de la Dépendance. Grenoble, 1995. 282 p. Phd Thesis-Institut National Polytechnique de Grenoble.

    Google Scholar 

  13. SICHMAN, J. S. DEPINT: Dependence-based coalition formation in an open multi-agent scenario. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 1(2), 1998. http://www.soc.surrey.ac.uk/JASSS/1/2/3.html.

  14. SMITH, R.G. The Contract Net Protocol: high-level communication and control in a distributed problem solver. IEEE Transactions on Computers, v.29, n.12, p.1104–1113, 1980.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. TOKORO, M.. The society of objects. Technical report SCSL-TR-93-018, Sony Computer Science Laboratory Inc., Tokyo, Japan, December 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  16. WOOLDRIDGE, M.; JENNINGS, N.R. Towards a theory of cooperative problem solving. In Yves Demazeau, Jean-Pierre Müller, and John Perram, editors, Pre-proceedings of the 6th European Workshop on Modelling Autonomous Agents in a Multi-Agent World, pages 15–26, Odense, Denmark, August 1994.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Ito, M., Simão Sichman, J. (2000). Dependence Based Coalitions and Contract Net: A Comparative Analysis. In: Monard, M.C., Sichman, J.S. (eds) Advances in Artificial Intelligence. IBERAMIA SBIA 2000 2000. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 1952. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44399-1_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44399-1_12

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-41276-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-44399-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics