Skip to main content

Automatic Case Base Management in a Multi-modal Reasoning System

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Case-Based Reasoning (EWCBR 2000)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 1898))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The definition of suitable case base maintenance policies is widely recognized as a major success key of CBR systems; underestimating this issue may lead to systems that that do not perform adequately under performance dimensions, namely computation time, competence and quality of solutions. The goal of the present paper is to analyse an automatic case base management strategy in the context of multi-modal architectures combining CBR and Model-Based Reasoning. The strategy, called Learning by Failure with Forgetting (LFF ) is based on incremental learning of cases interleaved with off-line processes of case deletion, in order to control the content and the size of the case library. Results from an extensive experimental analysis in an industrial plant diagnosis domain is then reported, showing the usefulness of LFF with respect to the maintenance of suitable performance level for the target system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. D. S. Aghassi. Evaluating case-based reasoning for heart failure diagnosis. Technical report, Dept. of EECS, MIT, Cambridge, MA, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  2. D. Aha and J. Daniels (eds.). Proc. AAAI Workshop on CBR Integrations. AAAI Press, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  3. R. Bellazzi, S. Montani, and L. Portinale. Retrieval in a prototype-based case library: a case study in diabetes therapy revision. In Proc. 4th EWCBR, LNAI 1488, pages 64–75. Springer Verlag, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  4. E. Freuder (ed.). AAAI Spring Symposium on Multi-modal Reasoning. AAAI Press, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  5. A. Gerevini and I. Serina. Fast planning trough greedy action graphs. In Proc. AAAI 99, pages 503–510, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  6. J. L. Kolodner. Case-Based Reasoning. Morgan Kaufmann, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  7. D. B. Leake and D. C. Wilson. Categorizing case-base maintenance dimensions and directions. In Proc. 4th EWCBR, LNAI 1488, pages 196–207. Springer Verlag, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  8. D. B. Leake and D. C. Wilson. When experience is wrong:examining CBR for changing tasks and environments. In Proc. 3rd ICCBR, LNAI 1650, pages 218–232. Springer Verlag, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  9. D. Magro and P. Torasso. Performance issues in unimodal and multimodal reasoning approaches to diagnosis. Technical report, Dip. di Informatica, Univ. di Torino, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  10. L. Portinale and P. Torasso. ADAPtER: an integrated diagnostic system combining case-based and abductive reasoning. In Proc. 1st ICCBR, LNAI 1010, pages 277–288. Springer Verlag, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  11. L. Portinale and P. Torasso. Performance issues in ADAPtER a combined CBR-MBR diagnostic architecture. In Proc. AAAI Spring Sympos. on Multi-Modal Reasoning. AAAI Press, Stanford, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  12. L. Portinale, P. Torasso, and D. Magro. Selecting most adaptable diagnostic solutions through Pivoting-Based Retrieval. In Proc. 2nd ICCBR, LNAI 1266, pages 393–402. Springer Verlag, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  13. L. Portinale, P. Torasso, and P. Tavano. Dynamic case memory management. In Proc. ECAI 98, pages 73–78, Brighton, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  14. L. Portinale, P. Torasso, and P. Tavano. Speed-up, quality and competence in multi-modal case-based reasoning. In Proc. 3nd ICCBR, LNAI 1650, pages 303–317. Springer Verlag, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  15. B. Smyth and P. Cunningham. The utility problem analysed: a case-based reasoning perspective. In LNAI 1168, pages 392–399. Springer Verlag, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  16. B. Smyth and M. T. Keane. Remembering to forget. In Proc. 14th IJCAI, pages 377–382, Montreal, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  17. B. Smyth and E. McKenna. Modeling the competence of case-bases. In Proc. 4th EWCBR, LNAI 1488, pages 208–220. Springer Verlag, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  18. B. Smyth and E. McKenna. Building compact competent case-bases. In Proc. 3th ICCBR, LNAI 1650, pages 329–342. Springer Verlag, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Portinale, L., Torasso, P. (2000). Automatic Case Base Management in a Multi-modal Reasoning System. In: Blanzieri, E., Portinale, L. (eds) Advances in Case-Based Reasoning. EWCBR 2000. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1898. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44527-7_21

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44527-7_21

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-67933-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-44527-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics