Skip to main content

Recognizing Intentions from Rejoinders in a Bayesian Interactive Argumentation System

  • Conference paper
PRICAI 2000 Topics in Artificial Intelligence (PRICAI 2000)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 1886))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

We describe a mechanism which recognizes a user’s intentions from short-form rejoinders to arguments generated from Bayesian networks. The mechanism builds candidate reasoning paths that link the user’s rejoinder with a previously presented argument, and considers the following factors to select a path: linguistic clues, the impact of the user’s rejoinder on the system’s argument along the different paths, the user’s attentional focus, and the system’s confidence in its representation of the user’s beliefs. The results of our preliminary evaluation indicate that the interpretations produced by our mechanism are generally appropriate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. J.R. Anderson. The Architecture of Cognition. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Sandra Carberry and Lynn Lambert. A process model for recognizing communicative acts and modeling negotiation subdialogues. Computational Linguistics, 25(1):1–53, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Eugene Charniak and Robert P. Goldman. A Bayesian model of plan recognition. Artificial Intelligence, 64(1):50–56, 1993.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Margot Flowers, Rod McGuire, and Lawrence Birnbaum. Adversary arguments and the logic of personal attack. In Strategies for Natural Language Processing, pages 275–294. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, New Jersey, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  5. David Heckerman and Eric Horvitz. Inferring informational goals from free-text queries: A Bayesian approach. In Proceedings of the Fourteenth Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, pages 230–237, Madison, Wisconsin, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Nathalie Jitnah, Ingrid Zukerman, Richard McConachy, and Sarah George. Towards the generation of rebuttals in a Bayesian argumentation system. In Proceedings of the International Natural Language Generation Conference, Mitzpe Ramon, Israel, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  7. R. McConachy, K. B. Korb, and I. Zukerman. Deciding what not to say: An attentional-probabilistic approach to argument presentation. In Proceedings of the Twentieth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, pages 669–674, Madison, Wisconsin, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Judea Pearl. Probabilistic Reasoning in Intelligent Systems. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Mateo, California, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Alex Quilici. Arguing about planning alternatives. In COLING-92 — Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Conference on Computational Linguistics, pages 906–910, Nantes, France, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  10. A. Restificar, A. Syed, and S. McRoy. Arguer: Using argument schemas for argument detection and rebuttal in dialogs. In UM99 — Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on User Modeling, pages 315–317, Banff, Canada, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ingrid Zukerman, Richard McConachy, and Kevin B. Korb. Bayesian reasoning in an abductive mechanism for argument generation and analysis. In AAAI98’ Proceedings of the Fifteenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 833–838, Madison, Wisconsin, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ingrid Zukerman, Richard McConachy, Kevin B. Korb, and Deborah A. Pickett. Exploratory interaction with a Bayesian argumentation system. In IJCAI99 — Proceedings of the Sixteenth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 1294–1299, Stockholm, Sweden, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Zukerman, I., Jitnah, N., McConachy, R., George, S. (2000). Recognizing Intentions from Rejoinders in a Bayesian Interactive Argumentation System. In: Mizoguchi, R., Slaney, J. (eds) PRICAI 2000 Topics in Artificial Intelligence. PRICAI 2000. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 1886. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44533-1_28

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44533-1_28

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-67925-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-44533-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics