Skip to main content

Improving Student Models by Reasoning about Cognitive Ability, Emotions and Gender

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
User Modeling 2001 (UM 2001)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 2109))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 928 Accesses

Abstract

We explore how cognitive, socio-biological and emotional conditions of the student help predict behavior within an ITS, and how instruction should be adapted depending on these variables to improve educational outcomes. Cognitive, social and emotional factors tend to be more permanent in nature than student’s knowledge. Our approach is to diagnose them with pre-tests before the user starts using the system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Arroyo, I.; Beck, J.; Beal, C.; Woolf, B.; Schultz, K.: Macroadapting Animalwatch to gender and cognitive differences with respect to hint interactivity and symbolism. Proceedings of Intelligent Tutoring Systems (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Arroyo, I.; Conejo, R.; Guzman, E.; Woolf, B.P.: An Adaptive Web-based Component for Cognitive Ability Estimation. Proceedings of Artificial Intelligence in Education (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Beal, C.R, Woolf, B.P., Beck, J.E., Arroyo, I., Schultz, K., Hart, D.M.: Gaining Confidence in Mathematics: Instructional Technology for Girls. Proceedings of Mathematics/Science Education and Technology (2000) pp. 57–64.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Eccles, J.S., Wigfield, A., Harold, R.D., Blumenfeld, P.: Age and gender differences in children’s self and task perceptions during elementary school. Child development, 64, (1993) pp. 830–847.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Fennema, E., Carpenter, T.P., Jacobs, V.R., Franke, M.L., Levi, L.W. (1998, June-July). A longitudinal study of gender differences in young children’s mathematical thinking. Educational Researcher, 27, 6–11.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Piaget, J. How Children Form Mathematical Concepts. 1953. In Scientific American.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Stipek, D.J., Gralinkski, J.H.: Gender differences in children’s achievement. Related beliefs and emotional responses to success and failure in mathematics. Journal of Educational Psychology (1991), 83, 361–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Voyat, G.E.: Piaget Systematized (1982). Lawrence Erlbawm.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Arroyo, I., Park Woolf, B. (2001). Improving Student Models by Reasoning about Cognitive Ability, Emotions and Gender. In: Bauer, M., Gmytrasiewicz, P.J., Vassileva, J. (eds) User Modeling 2001. UM 2001. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 2109. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44566-8_40

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44566-8_40

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-42325-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-44566-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics