Abstract
With increased use of multimedia and computers in education, the use of animation to illustrate dynamics is becoming more commonplace. Previous research suggests that diagrams may reduce cognitive processing as all information is perceptually available, making it more explicit and therefore requiring less inferencing (e.g. Simon and Larkin 1987). Animation, therefore, may be expected to enhance learning, especially when illustrating dynamic processes, as motion is depicted more visually explicitly, thus reducing cognitive processing. However, although animation may increase explicit perceptually available information, it may not automatically improve understanding. Visual explicitness itself does not necessarily guarantee accurate perception of specific information, nor does perception of information guarantee comprehension. Initial studies suggest that certain characteristics of diagrammatic animation have significant effects on cognitive interaction with material and therefore on comprehension. Current computer technology not only enables improved graphical animated illustration, but also provides the facility to physically interact with information on the screen. This in itself may influence the kind of learning that takes place. This paper presents research investigating how different ways of both representing and interacting with animated diagrams influence the kinds of cognitive interactions that may take place.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Anderson, J. (1995) Cognitive Psychology and its Implications 4th edition. Freeman, New York.
Green, T. (1989) Cognitive Dimensions of Notation. In (eds) Sutcliffe and Macaulay People and Computers V C.U.P.
Hegarty, M. and Kozhevnikov, M. (1999) Types of visual-spatial representations and mathematical problem solving. Journal of Educational Psychology vol. 91, No. 4, p. 684–689.
Hegarty, M. and Kozhevnikov, M. (1999) Spatial Abilities, Working Memory, and Mechanical Reasoning. University of California, Santa Barbara, http://www.arch.usyd.edu.au/kcdc/books/VR99/
Hoogeveen (1997) Towards a theory of effectiveness of multimedia systems. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction. 9(2), 151–168.
Jones and Scaife (1999) Diagram Representation: A Comparison of animated and static formats. Proceedings ofAAECEd-Media 99 p. 622–627.
Kaiser, M., Proffitt, D., Whelan, S. and Hecht, H. (1992) Influence of animation on dynamical judgements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 18, 669–690.
Large, A., Beheshti, J., Breuleux, A., Renaud, A. (1994) Multimedia and Comprehension: A Cognitive Study. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 45(7), 515–528.
Large, A(1996) Computer Animation in an Instructional Environment. Library and Information Science Research, 18, 3,23.
Larkin, J. & Simon, H. (1987) Why a diagram is (sometimes) worth ten thousand words. Cognitive Science 11, 69–100.
Mayer, R. and Anderson, R. (1991) Animations need narrations: An Experimental Test of a Dual-Coding Hypothesis. Journal of Educational Psychology 83, 4, 484–490.
Mayer, R. and Anderson, R. (1992) The instructive animation: helping students build connections between words and pictures in multimedia learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 444–452.
Park, O. (1998) Visual Displays and Contextual Presentations in Computer Based Instruction. Educational Technology Research & Development.
Rogers, Y. and Scaife, M. (1997) How Can Interactive Multimedia Facilitate Learning? Proceedings of First International Workshop on Intelligence andMultimodality in Multimedia Interfaces (in press).
Scaife, M. and Rogers, Y. (1996) External Cognition: how do graphical representations work. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 45, 185–213.
Stenning, K. (1998) Distinguishing Semantic from Processing Explanations of Usability of Representations: Applying Expressiveness Analysis to Animation. Proceedings of Intelligence and Multimodality in Multimedia Interfaces Workshop.
Winn, W. (1987) Charts, graphs, and diagrams in educational materials. In D. M. Willows & H. A. Houghton (eds)The Psychology of Illustration Volume 1 Basic Research. New York, NY; Springer-Verlag.
Zhang, J. and Norman, D. (1994) Representations in distributed cognitive tasks. Cognitive Science 18, 87–122.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2000 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Jones, S., Scaife, M. (2000). Animated Diagrams: An Investigation into the Cognitive Effects of Using Animation to Illustrate Dynamic Processes. In: Anderson, M., Cheng, P., Haarslev, V. (eds) Theory and Application of Diagrams. Diagrams 2000. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 1889. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44590-0_22
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44590-0_22
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-67915-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-44590-6
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive