Skip to main content

Taxonomic Conversational Case-Based Reasoning

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Case-Based Reasoning Research and Development (ICCBR 2001)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 2080))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Conversational Case-Based Reasoning (CCBR) systems engage a user in a series of questions and answers to retrieve cases that solve his/her current problem. Help-desk and interactive troubleshooting systems are among the most popular implementations of the CCBR methodology. As in traditional CBR systems, features in a CCBR system can be expressed at varying levels of abstraction. In this paper, we identify the sources of abstraction and argue that they are uncontrollable in applications typically targeted by CCBR systems. We contend that ignoring abstraction in CCBR can cause representational inconsistencies, adversely affect retrieval and conversation performance, and lead to case indexing and maintenance problems. We propose an integrated methodology called Taxonomic CCBR that uses feature taxonomies for handling abstraction to correct these problems. We describe the benefits and limitations of our approach and examine issues for future research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Aha, D.W., Breslow, L.A., & Munoz-Avila, H., (2001), Conversational Case-Based Reasoning, Applied Intelligence, 14(1), pp. 9–31.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Aha, D.W., Maney, T., & Breslow, L.A., (1998), Supporting Dialogue Inferencing in Conversational Case-Based Reasoning, Advances in Case-Based Reasoning (B. Smyth and P. Cunningham (Eds.)), 4th European Workshop EWCBR-98, Dublin, Ireland, pp. 262–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alterman, R., Griffin, D., (1994), Remembering Episodes of Question Answering, Proceedings of the Second European Workshop on Case-Based Reasoning, EWCBR-94, M. Keane, J.P. Haton, M. Manago (Eds.), pp. 235–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arocha, J.F. & Patel, V.L., (1995), Diagnostic Reasoning by Novices: Accounting For Evidence, Journal of Learning Sciences, 4(4), pp. 355–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashley, K.D., & Lenz, M. (Eds.), (1998), Textual Case-Based Reasoning, Papers from the AAAI-98 Workshop, AAAI Tech. Rep. WS-98-12, AAAI Press, Melno Park, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baudin, C., & Waterman, S., (1998), From Text to Cases: Machine Aided Text Categorization for Capturing Business Reengineering Cases, Proceedings of the AAAI Workshop on Textual Case-Based Reasoning, Technical Report WS-98-12, pp. 51–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergmann, R., & Wilke, W., (1996), On the Role of Abstraction in Case-Based Reasoning, (I. Smith and B. Faltings (Eds.)), Advances in Case-Based Reasoning, EWCBR-96, pp. 28–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Branting, K.L., & Aha, D.W., (1995), Stratified Case-Based Reasoning: Reusing Hierarchical Problem Solving Episodes, IJCAI 1995, Vol. 1, pp. 384–390.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carrick, C., Yang, Q., Abi-Zeid, I., & Lamontagne, L., (1999), Activating CBR systems through autonomous information gathering. Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Case-Based Reasoning, Munich, Germany: Springer, pp. 74–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • DoD (1997). Joint tactics, techniques and procedures for noncombatant evacuation operations (Joint Report 3-07.51). Washington, DC: Department of Defense, Joint Chiefs of Staff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drastal, G., & Czako, G., (1989), Induction in an abstraction space: A Form of Constructive Induction,” Proceedings of the Eleventh International Joint Conference on AI, Vol.1, pp. 708–712.

    Google Scholar 

  • Everett, J.O., Bobrow, D.G., (2000), Resolving Redundancy: A Recurring Problem in a Lessons Learned System, Intelligent Lessons Learned Systems: Papers from the AAAI Workshop (Technical Report AIC-00-005), Washington DC: Naval Research Laboratory, Navy Center for Applied Research in Artificial Intelligence, pp. 12–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furnas, G.W., Landauer, T.K., Gomez, L.M., & Dumais, S.T., (1987), The Vocabulary Problem in Human-System Communication, The Communications of the ACM, 30(10), pp. 964–971.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, K.M., & Montazemi, A.R., (1997), Empirical Evaluation of Retrieval in Case-Based Reasoning Systems using Modified Cosine Matching Function, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 27(5), pp. 601–612.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, K.M., (1998), Knowledge-Based System For Troubleshooting Complex Equipment, International Journal of Information and Computing Science, 1(1), pp. 29–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolodner, J.L., (1993), Case-Based Reasoning, Morgan Kaufman, San Mateo, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • McSherry, D., (2001), Interactive Case-Based Reasoning in Sequential Diagnosis, Applied Intelligence, 14(1), pp. 65–76.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Montazemi A.R., & Gupta K.M., (1996), An Adaptive Agent for Case Description in Diagnostic CBR Systems, Computers in Industry, 29(3), pp. 209–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pedrycz, W., & Vukovich, G., (2000), Granular Worlds: Representation and Communication Problems, International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 15(11), pp. 1015–1026

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Racine, C., and Yang. Q., (2001), Redundancy and Inconsistency Detection in Large and Semi-Structured Case Bases, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, To appear.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, D.J., & Tanimoto, T.T., (1960), A Computer Program for Classifying Plants, Science, Vol. 1332, pp.1115–1118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosch, E., (1978), Principals of Categorization, in Cognition and Categorization, E. Rosch and B. Llyod, (Eds.) Lawrence Earlbaum Associates Publishers, Hillsdale, New Jersey, NJ, pp. 28–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shimazu, H., (1999), Translation of Tacit Knowledge into Explicit knowledge: Analyses of Recorded Conversations between Customers and Human Agents, Exploring Synergies of Knowledge Management and Case-Based Reasoning, Papers from the AAAI Workshop, TR WS-99-10, pp. 81–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trott, J.R., Leng, B., (1997), An Engineering Approach for Troubleshooting Case Bases, Case-Based Reasoning Research and Development, (Eds.) D.B. Leake and E. Plaza, ICCBR-97, pp.178–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, Q., & Wu, J., (2001), Enhancing the Effectiveness of Interactive Case-Based Reasoning with Clustering and Decision Forests, Applied Intelligence, 14(1), pp. 49–64.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Gupta, K.M. (2001). Taxonomic Conversational Case-Based Reasoning. In: Aha, D.W., Watson, I. (eds) Case-Based Reasoning Research and Development. ICCBR 2001. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 2080. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44593-5_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44593-5_16

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-42358-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-44593-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics