Skip to main content

Similarity vs. Diversity

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Case-Based Reasoning Research and Development (ICCBR 2001)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 2080))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Case-based reasoning systems usually accept the conventional similarity assumption during retrieval, preferring to retrieve a set of cases that are maximally similar to the target problem. While we accept that this works well in many domains, we suggest that in others it is misplaced. In particular, we argue that often diversity can be as important as similarity. This is especially true in case-based recommender systems. In this paper we propose and evaluate strategies for improving retrieval diversity in CBR systems without compromising similarity or efficiency.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aamodt, A. and Plaza, E.: Case-Based Reasoning: Foundational Issues, Methodological Variations, and System Approaches. AI Communications, 7(1):39–52, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bergmann, R., Richter, M., Schmitt, S., Stahl, A. and Vollrath, I.: Utility-SOriented Matching: A New Research Direction for Case-Based Reasoning. In: Proceedings of the German Workshop on Case-Based Reasoning, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Burke, R.: Conceptual Indexing and Active Retrieval of Video for Interactive Learning Environments. Knowledge-Based Systems, 9(8):491–499, 1996.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Burke, R.: A case-based approach to collaborative filtering. In: Proceedings of the 5th European Workshop on Case-Based Reasoning. Springer-Verlag, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Faltings, B.: Probabilistic Indexing for Case-Based Prediction. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Case-Based Reasoning, pages 611–622. Springer-Verlag, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  6. S. Fox, S. and Leake, D. B.: Using Introspective Reasoning to Refine Indexing. In: Proceedings of the 14th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 391–397. Morgan Kaufmann, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kolodner, J.: Judging which is the “best” case for a case-based reasoner. In: Proceedings of the Second Workshop on Case-Based Reasoning, pages 77–81. Morgan Kaufmann, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kolodner, J.: Case-Based Reasoning. Morgan Kaufmann, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Konstan, J.A., Miller, B.N., Maltz, D., Herlocker, J.L., Gorgan, L.R., and J. Riedl.: GroupLens: Applying collaborative filtering to Usenet news. Communications of the ACM, 40(3):77–87, 1997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Leake, D. B.: Case-Based Reasoning: Experiences,Lessons and Future Directions. AAAI/MIT Press, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Leake, D. B.: Constructive Similarity Assessment: Using Stored Cases to Define New Situations. In: Proceedings of the 14th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, pages 313–318. Lawrence Earlbaum Associates, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Smyth, B. and Cotter, P.: A Personalized TV Listings Service for the Digital TV Age. Journal of Knowledge-Based Systems, 13(2-3):53–59, 2000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Smyth, B.: and Keane, M.: Adaptation-Guided Retrieval: Questioning the Similarity Assumption in Reasoning. Artificial Intelligence, 102:249–293, 1998.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Smyth, B.: and McKenna, E.: Incremental Footprint-Based Retrieval. In: Proceedings of the 21st SGES International Conference on Knowledge Based Systems and Applied Artificial Intelligence, pages 89–101. Springer Verlag, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Smyth, B., McClave, P. (2001). Similarity vs. Diversity. In: Aha, D.W., Watson, I. (eds) Case-Based Reasoning Research and Development. ICCBR 2001. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 2080. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44593-5_25

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44593-5_25

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-42358-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-44593-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics