Skip to main content

Learning Feature Weights from Case Order Feedback

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Case-Based Reasoning Research and Development (ICCBR 2001)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 2080))

Included in the following conference series:

Defining adequate similarity measures is one of the most difficult tasks when developing CBR applications. Unfortunately, only a limited number of techniques for supporting this task by using machine learning techniques have been developed up to now. In this paper, a new framework for learning similarity measures is presented. The main advantage of this approach is its generality, because its application is not restricted to classification tasks in contrast to other already known algorithms. A first refinement of the introduced framework for learning feature weights is described and finally some preliminary experimental results are presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. D. Aha. Case-based learning algorithms. In Proceedings of the DARPA Case-Based Reasoning Workshop, pages 147–158. Morgan Kaufmann, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  2. D. W. Aha and D Wettschereck. Case-based learning: Beyond classification of feature vectors. In Proceedings of the 9th European Conference on Machine Learning (ECML‘97). Springer, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  3. R. Bergmann, M. Michael Richter, S. Schmitt, A. Stahl, and I. Vollrath. Utility-oriented matching: A new research direction for Case-Based Reasoning. In Professionelles Wissensmanagement: Erfahrungen und Visionen. Proceedings of the 1st Conference on Professional Knowledge Management. Shaker, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  4. A. Bonzano, P. Cunningham, and B. Smyth. Using introspective learning to improve retrieval in CBR: A case study in air traffic control. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Case-Based Reasoning (ICCBR-97). Springer, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Igor Kononenko. Estimating attributes: Analysis and extensions of RELIEF. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Machine Learning, pages 171–182, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  6. F. Ricci and P. Avesani. Learning a local similarity metric for case-based reasoning. In Proceeding of the 1st International Conference on Case-Based Reasoning (ICCBR‘95), pages 301–312. Springer, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Michael M. Richter. Classification and learning of similarity measures. Technical Report SR-92-18, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Michael M. Richter. The knowledge contained in similarity measures. Invited Talk at ICCBR-95, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  9. B. Smyth and M. T. Keane. Retrieving adaptable cases: The role of adaptation knowledge in case retrieval. In Proceedings of the 1st European Workshop on Case-Based Reasoning. Springer, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  10. A. Stahl and R. Bergmann. Applying recursive CBR for the customization of structured products in an electronic shop. In Proceedings of the 5th European Workshop on Case-Based Reasoning. Springer, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  11. M. Stolpmann and S. Wess. Optimierung der Kundenbeziehung mit CBR-Systemen. Business and Computing. Addison-Wesley, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Dietrich Wettschereck and David W. Aha. Weighting features. In Proceeding of the 1st International Conference on Case-Based Reasoning (ICCBR‘95), pages 347–358. Springer Verlag, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  13. W. Wilke and R. Bergmann. Considering decision cost during learning of feature weights. In Proceedings of the 3rd European Workshop on Case-Based Reasoning. Springer, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Z. Zhang and Q. Yang. Dynamic refiniement of feature weights using quantitative introspective learning. In Proceedings of the 16th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI 99), 1999.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Stahl, A. (2001). Learning Feature Weights from Case Order Feedback. In: Aha, D.W., Watson, I. (eds) Case-Based Reasoning Research and Development. ICCBR 2001. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 2080. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44593-5_35

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44593-5_35

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-42358-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-44593-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics