Skip to main content

Similarity Assessment for Relational CBR

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 2080))

Abstract

Reasoning and learning from cases are based on the concept of similarity often estimated by a distance. This paper presents LAUD, a distance measure that can be used to estimate similarity among relational cases. This measure is adequate for domains where cases are best represented by relations among entities. An experimental evaluation of the accuracy of LAUD is presented for the task of classifying marine sponges.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. E. Armengol and E. Plaza. Bottom-up induction of feature terms. Machine Learning Journal, 41(1):259–294, 2000.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. E. Armengol and E. Plaza. Individual prognosis of diabetes long-term risks: A CBR approach. Methods of Information in Medicine, page to appear, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  3. R. Bergmann and A. Stahl. Similarity measures for object-oriented case representations. In Proc. European Workshop on Case-Based Reasoning, EWCBR-98, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, pages 8–13. Springer Verlag, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  4. G. Bisson. Why and how to define a similarity measure for object based representation systems, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  5. K Börner. Structural similarity as a guidance in case-based design. In Topics in Case-Based Reasoning: EWCBR’94, pages 197–208, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  6. H Bunke and B T Messmer. Similarity measures for structured representations. In Topics in Case-Based Reasoning: EWCBR’94, pages 106–118, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  7. W. Emde and D. Wettschereck. Relational instance based learning. In Lorenza Saitta, editor, Machine Learning-Proceedings 13th International Conference on Machine Learning, pages 122–130. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  8. T. Horváth, S. Wrobel, and U. Bohnebeck. Relational instance-based learning with lists and terms. Machine Learning Journal, 43(1):53–80, 2001.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Stephen Muggleton and Luc De Raedt. Inductive logic programming: Theory and methods. Journal of Logic Programming, 19-20:629–679, 1994.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. E. Plaza, R. López de Mántaras, and E. Armengol. On the importance of similitude:An entropy-based assessment. In I. Smith and B. Saltings, editors, Advances in Case-based reasoning, number 1168 in Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, pages 324–338. Springer-Verlag, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Enric Plaza. Cases as terms: A feature term approach to the structured representation of cases. In M. Veloso and A. Aamodt, editors, Case-Based Reasoning, ICCBR-95, number 1010 in Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, pages 265–276. Springer-Verlag, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Armengol, E., Plaza, E. (2001). Similarity Assessment for Relational CBR. In: Aha, D.W., Watson, I. (eds) Case-Based Reasoning Research and Development. ICCBR 2001. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 2080. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44593-5_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44593-5_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-42358-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-44593-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics