Abstract
Contextual Categorization theory (CC-T) is introduced as a theory based on Galois lattices that are used to capture the organization of current situations. It is shown how the objects and their properties are processed to simulate cognitive phenomena related to context effects: denotation, description, explanation, similarity judgement, analogy, non-literal language understanding and reasoning.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Zibetti, E., Hamilton, E., & Tijus C.A. (1999). The role of Context in Interpreting Perceived Events as Action. In J.G. Carbonell & J. Siekmann (eds), Lectures Notes in Artificial Intelligence, vol. 1688, Modeling and Using Context, (pp. 431–441). New-York: Springer.
Schyns, P., Goldstone, R.L., & Thibaut, J.-P. (1998). The development of features in Sjoberg, L. (1972). A cognitive theory of similarity. Goteborg: Psychological Reports, 2(10).
Tijus, C.A., Moulin, F. (1997). L’assignation de signification á partir de textes d’histoires drôles. L’Année Psychologique, 97, 33–75.
Barsalou, L.W., 1995. “Deriving Categories to Achieve Goals”. In A. Ram & D.B. Lake (eds.), Goal-Driven Learning. Cambridge: The M.I.T. Press.
Barbut, M., & Monjardet, B. (1970). Ordre et classification: algebre et combinatoire. Paris: Hachette.
Poitrenaud, S. (1995). The Procope Semantic Network: an alternative to action grammars. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 42, 31–69.
Barsalou, L. W. (1982). Context-independent and context-dependent information in concepts. Memory and Cognition, 10, 82–93.
Nosofsky, R. M. (1991). Stimulus bias, asymmetric similarity, and classification. Cognitive Psychology, 23, 94–140.
Sjoberg, L. (1972). A cognitive theory of similarity. Goteborg: Psychological Reports, 2(10).
Thibaut, J.P. (1986). Classification et représentativité d’objets. Rôle des attributs constitutifs. Cahiers de Psychologie Cognitive, 6, 41–60.
Tversky, A. (1977). Features of similarity. Psychological Review, 84, 327–352.
Rips, L.J., & Conrad, F.G. (1989). Folk Psychology of Mental Activities. Psychological Review, 96, 187–207.
Poitrenaud, S. (1998). La représentation des PROCédures chez l’OPErateur: Description et mise en oeuvre des savoir-faire. Thése de Doctorat. Université de Paris 8.
Smith, E.E. & Medin, D.L. (1981). Categories and Concepts. Cambridge, M.A. Harvard University Press.
Rips, L.J., & Conrad, F.G. (1989). Folk Psychology of Mental Activities. Psychological Review, 96, 187–207.
Tijus, C.A. (1997). Assignation de signification et construction de la représentation. Habilitation á Diriger des Recherches. Université de Paris VIII.
Richard, J.F., & Tijus, C.A. (1998). Modelling the Affordances of Objects in Problem Solving, Special Issue of Analise Psicologica about Cognition and Context, 293–315.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Les métaphores dans la vie quotidienne, Paris: édition de minuit.
Glucksberg, S., McGlone, M.S., & Manfredi, D. (1997). Property attribution in metaphor comprehension, Journal of Memory and Language, 36, 50–67.
Johnson, S. C. (1967). Hierarchical clustering schemes. Psychometrica, 32, 241–254.
Arabie, P., & Carroll, J., D. (1980). MAPCLUS model: a mathematical programming approach to fitting the ADCLUS model. Psychometrica, 45, 211–235.
Corter, A., & Tversky, A. (1986). Extended similarity trees. Psychometrica, 51, 429–451.
Sattath, S., & Tversky, A(1977). Additive similarity trees. Psychometrika, 42, 319–345.
Génoche, A., & Van Mechelen, I. (1993). Galois approach to the induction of concepts. In I. Van Mechelen, J. Hampton, R.S. Michalski, & P. Theuns (Eds.), Categories and concepts: Theoretical and inductive data analysis (pp. 287–308). London: Academic Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2001 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Tijus, C. (2001). Contextual Categorization and Cognitive Phenomena. In: Akman, V., Bouquet, P., Thomason, R., Young, R. (eds) Modeling and Using Context. CONTEXT 2001. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 2116. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44607-9_24
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44607-9_24
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-42379-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-44607-1
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive