Skip to main content

On the Complexity of Explicit Modal Logics

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Computer Science Logic (CSL 2000)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 1862))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Explicit modal logic was introduced by S. Artemov. Whereas the traditional modal logic uses atoms ☐F with a possible semantics “F is provable”, the explicit modal logic deals with atoms of form t:F, where t is a proof polynomial denoting a specific proof of a formula F. Artemov found the explicit modal logic \( \mathcal{L}\mathcal{P} \) in this new format and built an algorithm that recovers explicit proof polynomials corresponding to modalities in every derivation in K. Gödel’s modal provability calculus \( \mathcal{S}4 \). In this paper we study the complexity of \( \mathcal{L}\mathcal{P} \) as well as the complexity of explicit counterparts of the modal logics \( \mathcal{K}, \mathcal{D}, \mathcal{T}, \mathcal{K}\mathcal{A}, \mathcal{D}4 \) found by V. Brezhnev. The main result: the satisfiability problem for each of these explicit modal logics belongs to the class ∑2 p 2 of the polynomial hierarchy. Similar problem for the original modal logics is known to be PSPACE-complete. Therefore, explicit modal logics have much better upper complexity bounds than the original modal logics.

The author is partially supported by the grant DAAH04-96-1-0341, by DAPRA under program LPE, project 34145.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Artemov, S.: Operational Modal Logic. Technical Report MSI 95-29. Cornell University (1995) http://www.math.cornell.edu/~artemov/MSI95-29.ps

  2. Artemov, S.: Logic of Proofs: a Unified Semantics for Modality and λ-terms. Technical Report CFIS 98-06. Cornell University (1998) http://www.math.cornell.edu/~artemov/CFIS98-06.ps

  3. Artemov, S.: Explicit Provability and Constructive Semantics. To appear in the Bulletin for Symbolic Logic http://www.math.cornell.edu/~artemov/BSL.ps

  4. Bidoit, M., Corbin, J.: A Rehabilitation of Robinson’s Unification Algorithm. Information Processing, Vol. 83. North-Holland (1983) 909–914

    Google Scholar 

  5. Brezhnev, V.: On Explicit Counterparts of Modal Logic. Manuscript (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gödel, K.: Eine Interpretation des intuitionistischen Aussagenkalkuls. Ergebnisse Math. Colloq., Bd. 4 (1933) 39–40

    Google Scholar 

  7. Mkrtychev, A.: Models for the Logic of Proofs. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 1234. Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg New York (1997) 266–275

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Kuznets, R. (2000). On the Complexity of Explicit Modal Logics. In: Clote, P.G., Schwichtenberg, H. (eds) Computer Science Logic. CSL 2000. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1862. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44622-2_25

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44622-2_25

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-67895-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-44622-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics