Abstract
The emergence of agents that play fair strategies is investigated in a simple bargaining model. The strategies played by the agents are constructed by evolutionary algorithms. Agents make offers to each other describing possible ways to share a certain commodity, until an offer is accepted. Finite-horizon bargaining models give an advantage to the first or last part making an offer, depending on the discount factor incurred by the players in each transaction. By introducing uncertainty regarding the playing order, i.e., who makes the first or last offers, experimental results show that evolutionary agents abandon greedy strategies, that attempt to obtain the whole commodity without sharing, for those that lead to more just divisions of the commodity.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
W. B. Arthur, J. H. Holland, B. LeBaron, R. Palmer, and P. Tayler. Asset pricing under endogenous expectations in an artificial stock market. In W. B. Arthur, S. N. Durlauf, and D. A. Lane, editors, The Economy as an Evolving Complex System II, pages 15–44. Addison-Wesley, 1997.
T. Bäck, G. Rudolph, and H.-P. Schwefel. Evolutionary programming and evolution strategies: Similarities and differences. In D. B. Fogel and W. Altmar, editors, Proc. the 2nd Annual Evolutionary Programming Conference, pages 11–22, February 1992.
K. Binmore. Game Theory and the Social Contract-Volume 2: Just Playing. MIT Press, 1998.
K. Binmore, A. Shaked, and J. Sutton. Testing noncooperative bargaining theory: A preliminary study. American Economic Review, 75(5):1178–1180, December 1985.
G. E. Bolton. The rationality of splitting equally. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 32:365–381, 1997.
C. Boutilier, Y. Shoham, and M. P. Wellman, editors. Artifical Intelligence, volume 94(1–2). Elsevier, July 1997. Special Issue on Economic Principles of Multi-Agent Systems.
R. Forsythe, J. L. Horowitz, N. E. Savin, and M. Sefton. Fairness in simple bargaining experiments. Games and Economic Behavior, 6:347–369, 1994.
E. H. Gerding, D. D. B. van Bragt, and J. A. L. Poutré. Multi-issue negotiation processes by evolutionary simulation: Validation and social extensions. Technical Report SEN R0024, CWI, Centre for Mathematics and Computer Science, 2000.
J. C. Harsanyi. Rational Behavior and Bargaining Equilibrium in Games and Social Situations. Cambridge University Press, 1977. Paperback edition: 1986.
J. O. Kephart, J. E. Hanson, and J. Sairamesh. Price and niche wars in a free-market economy of software agents. Artificial Life, 4(1):1–23, 1998.
N. Matos, C. Sierra, and N. R. Jennings. Determining successful negotiation strategies: An evolutionary approach. In Proc. 3rd Int. Conf. on Multi-Agent Systems (ICMAS 98), pages 182–189, 1998.
A. Muthoo. Bargaining Theory with Applications. Cambridge University Press, 1999.
J. Neelin, H. Sonnenschein, and M. Spiegel. A further test of noncooperative bargaining theory: Comment. American Economic Review, 78(4):824–836, September 1988.
J. Ochs and A. E. Roth. An experimental study of sequential bargaining. American Economic Review, 79(3):355–384, June 1989.
J. R. Oliver. On Artificial Agents for Negotiation in Electronic Commerce. PhD thesis, University of Pennsylvania, 1996.
J. Rawls. A Theory of Justice. Belknap Press, 1999. Revised Edition.
J. S. Rosenschein and G. Zlotkin. Rules of Encounter: Designing Conventions for Automated Negotiation among Computers. MIT Press, 1994.
A. Rubinstein. Perfect equilibrium in a bargaining model. Econometrica, 50(1):97–109, January 1982.
T. J. Sargent. Bounded Rationality in Macroeconomics. Oxford University Press, 1993.
H. A. Simon. Models of Bounded Rationality: Behavioral Economics and Business Organization, volume 2. MIT Press, 1982.
R. H. Thaler. The ultimatum game. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 2(4):195–206, 1989.
D. D. B. van Bragt, E. H. Gerding, and J. A. L. Poutré. Equilibrium selection in alternating-offers bargaining models: The evolutionary computing approach. In 6 th Int. Conf. of the Society for Computational Economics on Computing in Economics and Finance (CEF’2000), July 2000.
H. R. Varian. Economic mechanism design for computerized agents. In Proceedings of the First Usenix Conference on Electronic Commerce. July 1995.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2001 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Nawa, N.E., Shimohara, K., Katai, O. (2001). On Fairness in an Alternating-Offers Bargaining Model with Evolutionary Agents. In: Yuan, S.T., Yokoo, M. (eds) Intelligent Agents: Specification, Modeling, and Applications. PRIMA 2001. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2132. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44637-0_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44637-0_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-42434-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-44637-8
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive