Skip to main content

On Fairness in an Alternating-Offers Bargaining Model with Evolutionary Agents

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Intelligent Agents: Specification, Modeling, and Applications (PRIMA 2001)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 2132))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 215 Accesses

Abstract

The emergence of agents that play fair strategies is investigated in a simple bargaining model. The strategies played by the agents are constructed by evolutionary algorithms. Agents make offers to each other describing possible ways to share a certain commodity, until an offer is accepted. Finite-horizon bargaining models give an advantage to the first or last part making an offer, depending on the discount factor incurred by the players in each transaction. By introducing uncertainty regarding the playing order, i.e., who makes the first or last offers, experimental results show that evolutionary agents abandon greedy strategies, that attempt to obtain the whole commodity without sharing, for those that lead to more just divisions of the commodity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. W. B. Arthur, J. H. Holland, B. LeBaron, R. Palmer, and P. Tayler. Asset pricing under endogenous expectations in an artificial stock market. In W. B. Arthur, S. N. Durlauf, and D. A. Lane, editors, The Economy as an Evolving Complex System II, pages 15–44. Addison-Wesley, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  2. T. Bäck, G. Rudolph, and H.-P. Schwefel. Evolutionary programming and evolution strategies: Similarities and differences. In D. B. Fogel and W. Altmar, editors, Proc. the 2nd Annual Evolutionary Programming Conference, pages 11–22, February 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  3. K. Binmore. Game Theory and the Social Contract-Volume 2: Just Playing. MIT Press, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  4. K. Binmore, A. Shaked, and J. Sutton. Testing noncooperative bargaining theory: A preliminary study. American Economic Review, 75(5):1178–1180, December 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  5. G. E. Bolton. The rationality of splitting equally. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 32:365–381, 1997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. C. Boutilier, Y. Shoham, and M. P. Wellman, editors. Artifical Intelligence, volume 94(1–2). Elsevier, July 1997. Special Issue on Economic Principles of Multi-Agent Systems.

    Google Scholar 

  7. R. Forsythe, J. L. Horowitz, N. E. Savin, and M. Sefton. Fairness in simple bargaining experiments. Games and Economic Behavior, 6:347–369, 1994.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. E. H. Gerding, D. D. B. van Bragt, and J. A. L. Poutré. Multi-issue negotiation processes by evolutionary simulation: Validation and social extensions. Technical Report SEN R0024, CWI, Centre for Mathematics and Computer Science, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  9. J. C. Harsanyi. Rational Behavior and Bargaining Equilibrium in Games and Social Situations. Cambridge University Press, 1977. Paperback edition: 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  10. J. O. Kephart, J. E. Hanson, and J. Sairamesh. Price and niche wars in a free-market economy of software agents. Artificial Life, 4(1):1–23, 1998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. N. Matos, C. Sierra, and N. R. Jennings. Determining successful negotiation strategies: An evolutionary approach. In Proc. 3rd Int. Conf. on Multi-Agent Systems (ICMAS 98), pages 182–189, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  12. A. Muthoo. Bargaining Theory with Applications. Cambridge University Press, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  13. J. Neelin, H. Sonnenschein, and M. Spiegel. A further test of noncooperative bargaining theory: Comment. American Economic Review, 78(4):824–836, September 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  14. J. Ochs and A. E. Roth. An experimental study of sequential bargaining. American Economic Review, 79(3):355–384, June 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  15. J. R. Oliver. On Artificial Agents for Negotiation in Electronic Commerce. PhD thesis, University of Pennsylvania, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  16. J. Rawls. A Theory of Justice. Belknap Press, 1999. Revised Edition.

    Google Scholar 

  17. J. S. Rosenschein and G. Zlotkin. Rules of Encounter: Designing Conventions for Automated Negotiation among Computers. MIT Press, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  18. A. Rubinstein. Perfect equilibrium in a bargaining model. Econometrica, 50(1):97–109, January 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  19. T. J. Sargent. Bounded Rationality in Macroeconomics. Oxford University Press, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  20. H. A. Simon. Models of Bounded Rationality: Behavioral Economics and Business Organization, volume 2. MIT Press, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  21. R. H. Thaler. The ultimatum game. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 2(4):195–206, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  22. D. D. B. van Bragt, E. H. Gerding, and J. A. L. Poutré. Equilibrium selection in alternating-offers bargaining models: The evolutionary computing approach. In 6 th Int. Conf. of the Society for Computational Economics on Computing in Economics and Finance (CEF’2000), July 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  23. H. R. Varian. Economic mechanism design for computerized agents. In Proceedings of the First Usenix Conference on Electronic Commerce. July 1995.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Nawa, N.E., Shimohara, K., Katai, O. (2001). On Fairness in an Alternating-Offers Bargaining Model with Evolutionary Agents. In: Yuan, S.T., Yokoo, M. (eds) Intelligent Agents: Specification, Modeling, and Applications. PRIMA 2001. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2132. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44637-0_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44637-0_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-42434-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-44637-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics