Skip to main content

A Semantic Tableau Version of First-Order Quasi-Classical Logic

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty (ECSQARU 2001)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 2143))

Abstract

Quasi-classical logic (QC logic) allows the derivation of non-trivial classical inferences from inconsistent information. A paraconsis-ent, or non-trivializable, logic is, by necessity, a compromise, or weakening, of classical logic. The compromises on QC logic seem to be more appropriate than other paraconsistent logics for applications in computing. In particular, the connectives behave in a “classical manner” at the object level so that important proof rules such as modus tollens, modus ponens, and disjunctive syllogism hold. Here we develop QC logic by presenting a semantic tableau version for first-order QC logic.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ph Besnard and A Hunter. Quasis-classical logic: Non-trivializable classical reasoning from inconsistent information. In C Froidevaux and K Kohlas, editors, Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Uncertainty, volume 946 of Lecture Notes in Computer Siences pages 44–51, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  2. N C daCosta. On the theory of inconsistent formal systems. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, 15:497–510, 1974.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. A Hunter and B Nuseibeh. Managing inconsistent specifiations: Reasoning, analysis and action. ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology, 7:335–367, 1998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. A Hunter. Paraconsistent logics. In Handbook of Defeasible Reasoning and Uncertainty Management Systems, volume 2, pages 11–36. Kluwer, 1998.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. A Hunter. Reasining with conflicting information using quasi-classical logic. Journal of Logic and Computation, 10:677–703, 2000.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. A Hunter. Reasining with inconsistency in structured text. Knowledge Engineering Review, 15:317–337, 2000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 68]_R Smullyan. First-order Logic. Springer, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Hunter, A. (2001). A Semantic Tableau Version of First-Order Quasi-Classical Logic. In: Benferhat, S., Besnard, P. (eds) Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty. ECSQARU 2001. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 2143. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44652-4_48

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44652-4_48

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-42464-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-44652-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics