Skip to main content

Small PCPs with Low Query Complexity

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover STACS 2001 (STACS 2001)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 2010))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 624 Accesses

Abstract

Most known constructions of probabilistically checkable proofs (PCPs) either blow up the proof size by a large polynomial, or have a high (though constant) query complexity. In this paper we give a transformation with slightly- super-cubic blowup in proof size, with a low query complexity. Specifically, the verifier probes the proof in 16 bits and rejects every proof of a false assertion with probability arbitrarily close to 1/2, while accepting corrects proofs of theo- rems with probability one. The proof is obtained by revisiting known construc- tions and improving numerous components therein. In the process we abstract a number of new modules that may be of use in other PCP constructions.

Supported in part by a Sloan Foundation Fellowship and NSF Career Award CCR-9875511.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Arora, S., Lund, C., Motwani, R., Sudan, M., AND Szegedy, M. Proof verification and the hardness of approximation problems. Journal of the ACM 45, 3 (May 1998), 501–555.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Arora, S., AND Safra, S. Probabilistic checking of proofs: A new characterization of NP. Journal of the ACM 45, 1 (Jan. 1998), 70–122.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Arora, S., AND Sudan, M. Improved low degree testing and its applications. In Proc. 29th ACM Symp. on Theory of Computing (El Paso, Texas, 4–6 May 1997), pp. 485–495.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bellare, M., Goldreich, O., AND Sudan, M. Free bits, PCPs, and nonapproximability—towards tight results. SIAM Journal of Computing 27, 3 (June 1998), 804–915.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bellare, M., Goldwasser, S., Lund, C., AND Russell, A. Efficient probabilistically checkable proofs and applications to approximation. In Proc. 25th ACM Symp. on Theory of Computing (San Diego, California, 16–18 May 1993), pp. 294–304.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cook, S. A. Short propositional formulas represent nondeterministic computations. Information Processing Letters 26, 5(11 Jan. 1988), 269–270.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Dinur, I., Fischer, E., Kindler, G., Raz, R., AND Safra, S. PCP characterizations of NP: Towards a polynomially-small error-probability. In Proc. 31th ACM Symp. on Theory of Computing (Atlanta, Georgia, 1–4 May 1999), pp. 29–40.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Friedl, K., AND Sudan, M. Some improvements to total degree tests. In Proc. 3rd Israel Symposium on Theoretical and Computing Systems (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Håstad, J. Clique is hard to approximate within n1-ε. In Proc. 37nd IEEE Symp. on Foundations of Comp. Science (Burlington, Vermont, 14–16 Oct. 1996), pp. 627–636.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Håstad, J. Some optimal inapproximability results. In Proc. 29th ACM Symp. on Theory of Computing (El Paso, Texas, 4–6 May 1997), pp. 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lund, C., Fortnow, L., Karloff, H., AND Nisan, N. Algebraic methods for interactive proof systems. In Proc. 31st IEEE Symp. on Foundations of Comp. Science (St. Louis, Missouri, 22–24 Oct. 1990), pp. 2–10.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Polishchuk, A., AND Spielman, D. A. Nearly-linear size holographic proofs. In Proc. 26th ACM Symp. on Theory of Computing (Montréal, Québec, Canada, 23–25 May 1994), pp. 194–203.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Raz, R., AND Safra, S. A sub-constant error-probability low-degree test, and a subconstant error-probability PCP characterization of NP. In Proc. 29th ACM Symp. on Theory of Computing (El Paso, Texas, 4–6 May 1997), pp. 475–484.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Rubinfeld, R., AND Sudan, M. Robust characterizations of polynomials with applications to program testing. SIAM Journal of Computing 25, 2 (Apr. 1996), 252–271.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Sudan, M. Efficient Checking of Polynomials and Proofs and the Hardness of Approximation Problems. PhD thesis, University of California, Berkeley, Oct. 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Szegedy, M. Many-valued logics and holographic proofs. In Automata, Languages and Programming, 26st International Colloquium (Prague, Czech Republic, 11-15 July 1999), J. Wiedermann, P. van Emde Boas, and M. Nielsen, Eds., vol. 1644 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer-Verlag, pp. 676–686.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Harsha, P., Sudan, M. (2001). Small PCPs with Low Query Complexity. In: Ferreira, A., Reichel, H. (eds) STACS 2001. STACS 2001. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2010. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44693-1_29

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44693-1_29

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-41695-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-44693-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics