Skip to main content

Evolutionary Multi-objective Ranking with Uncertainty and Noise

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 1993))

Abstract

Real engineering optimisation problems are often subject to parameters whose values are uncertain or have noisy objective functions. Techniques such as adding small amounts of noise in order to identify robust solutions are also used. The process used in evolutionary algorithms to decide which solutions are better than others do not account for these uncertainties and rely on the inherent robustness of the evolutionary approach in order to find solutions. In this paper, the ranking process needed to provide probabilities of selection is re-formulated to begin to account for the uncertainties and noise present in the system being optimised. Both single and multi-objective systems are considered for rank-based evolutionary algorithms. The technique is shown to be effective in reducing the disturbances to the evolutionary algorithm caused by noise in the objective function, and provides a simple mathematical basis for describing the ranking and selection process of multi-objective and uncertain data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. T. W. Then and Edwin K. Chong. Genetic algorithms in noisy environment. In IEEE International Symposium on Intelligent Control, pages 225–230, Columbus, Ohio, 16-18 August 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Adrian Thompson. Evolutionary techniques for fault tolerance. In Control’ 96, UKACC International Conference on, volume 1, pages 693-698. IEE, 2-5 September 1996. Conf. Publ. No. 427.

    Google Scholar 

  3. T. Bäck and U. Hammel. Evolution strategies applied to perturbed objective functions. In IEEE World Congress on Computational Intelligence, volume 1, pages 40–45. IEEE, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Shigeyoshi Tsutsui and Ashish Ghosh. Genetic algorithms with a robust searching scheme. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 1(3): 201–8, September 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kumar Chellapilla and David B. Fogel. Anaconda defeats hoyle 6-0: A case study competing an evolved checkers program against commercially available software. In Congress on Evolution Computation-CEC2000, volume 1, pages 857–863, SanDiego, CA, 16-19 July 2000. IEEE.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Carlos A. Coello Coello. List of references on evolutionary multiobjective optimization. http://www.lania.mx/ ~ ccoello/EMOO/EMOObib.html. Last accessed 3 July 2000.

  7. Anna L. Blumel, Evan J. Hughes, and Brian A. White. Fuzzy autopilot design using a multiobjective evolutionary algorithm. In Congress on Evolution Computation-CEC2000, volume 1, pages 54–61, San Diego, CA, 16-19 July 2000. IEEE.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Carlos M. Fonseca and Peter J. Flemming. Multiobjective genetic algorithms made easy: Selection, sharing and mating restriction. In GALESIA 95, pages 45–52, 12-14 September 1995. IEE Conf. Pub. No. 414.

    Google Scholar 

  9. N. Srinivas and Kalyanmoy Deb. Multiobjective optimization using nondominated sorting in genetic algorithms. Evolutionary Computation, 2(3):221–248, 1995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. David A. Van Veldhuizen and Gary B. Lamont. Multiobjective evolutionary algorithm research: A history and analysis. Technical Report TR–98–03, Air Force Institute of Technology, 1 Dec 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  11. William H. Press, Brian P. Flannery, Saul A. Teukolsky, and William T. Vetterling. NUMERICAL RECIPES in C. The Art Of Scientific Computing. Cambridge University Press, second edition, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Evan J. Hughes. Multi-objective probabilistic selection evolutionary algorithm. Technical Report DAPS/EJH/56/2000, Dept. Aerospace, Power, & Sensors, Cranfield University, RMCS, Shrivenham, UK, SN6 8LA, September 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  13. J. E. Baker. Adaptive selection methods for genetic algorithms. In Proc. 1st Int. conf. on Genetic Algorithms, pages 101–111, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Hughes, E.J. (2001). Evolutionary Multi-objective Ranking with Uncertainty and Noise. In: Zitzler, E., Thiele, L., Deb, K., Coello Coello, C.A., Corne, D. (eds) Evolutionary Multi-Criterion Optimization. EMO 2001. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1993. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44719-9_23

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44719-9_23

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-41745-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-44719-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics