Skip to main content

Two Variational Models for Multispectral Image Classification

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 2134))

Abstract

We propose two variational models for supervised classification of multispectral data. Both models take into account contour and region information by minimizing a functional compound of a data term (2D surface integral) taking into account the observation data and knowledge on the classes, and a regularization term (1D length integral) minimizing the length of the interfaces between regions. This is a free discontinuity problem and we have proposed two different ways to reach such a minimum, one using a Γ -convergence approach and the other using a level set approach to model contours and regions.

Both methods have been previously developed in the case of monospectral observations. Multispectral techniques allow to take into account information of severalsp ectralbands of satellite or aerialsensors. The goalof this paper is to present the extension of both variationalcl assification methods to multispectral data. We show an application on real data from SPOT (XS mode) satellite for which we have a ground truth. Our results are also compared to results obtained by using a hierarchical stochastic model.

This work has been conducted in relation with the GdR-PRC ISIS research group (http://www.isis.enst.fr)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. L. Alvarez, P.-L. Lions, and J.-M. Morel. Image selective smoothing and edge detection by nonlinear diffusion. SI AM J. of Numerical Analysis, 29(3):845–866, 1992.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. S. Baldo. Minimal interface criterion for phase transitions in mixtures of Cahn-Hilliard fluids. Ann. Inst. Henri Poincaré, 7:67–90, 1990.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. G. Barles, H. M. Soner, and P.E. Souganidis. Front propagation and phase field theory. SIAM J. Control and Optimization, 31:439–479, 1993.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. M. Berthod, Z. Kato, S. Yu, and J. Zerubia. Bayesian image classification using Markov random fields. Image and Vision Computing, 14(4):285–293, 1996.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. C. Bhattacharyya. A simple method of resolution of a distribution into Gaussian components. Biometrics, 23(4):115–135, 1967.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. P. Blomgren and T.F. Chan. Color TV: Total variation methods for restoration of vector-valued images. IEEE Trans. on Image Procesing, 7(3):304–309, March 1998. Special issue on partial differential equations and geometry driven diffusion in image processing and analysis.

    Google Scholar 

  7. C.A. Bouman and M. Shapiro. A multiscale random field model for Bayesian image segmentation. IEEE Trans. on Image Processing, 3:162–177, March 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  8. V. Caselles, F. Catte, T. Coll, and F. Dibos. A geometric model for active contours. Numerische Mathematik, 66:1–31, 1993.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. V. Caselles, R. Kimmel, and G. Sapiro. Geodesic active contours. International J. of Computer Vision, 22(1):61–79, 1997.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. P. Charbonnier, L. Blanc-Féraud, G. Aubert, and M. Barlaud. Deterministic edge-preserving regularization in computed imaging. IEEE Trans. on Image Processing, 6(2):298–311, February 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  11. A. Chardin. Mod`eles énergétiques hiérarchiques pour la résolution des problémes inverses en analyse d’ images. PhD thesis, Université de Rennes I, France, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  12. X. Descombes, R. Morris, and J. Zerubia. Some improvements to Bayesian image segmentation. Part two: classification. (in french). Traitement du Signal, 14(4):383–395, 1997.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. L. C. Evans and R. F. Gariepy. Measure theory and fine properties of functions. CRC Press, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  14. L.C. Evans and J. Spruck. Motion of level sets by mean curvature. part II. Trans, of the American Mathematical Society, 330(1):321–332, 1992.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. D. Geman and G. Reynolds. Constrained restoration and the recovery of discontinuities. IEEE Trans. on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 14(3):367–383, 1992.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. M. Kass, A. Witkin, and D. Terzopoulos. Snakes: active contour models. International J. of Computer Vision, 1:321–331, 1987.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Z. Kato. Multiresolution Markovian modeling for computer vision. Application to SPOT image segmentation (in French and English). PhD thesis, Universite de Nice-Sophia Antipolis, France, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  18. A. Lorette, X. Descombes, and J. Zerubia. Texture analysis through a Markovian modelling and fuzzy classification: application to urban area extraction from satellite images. International Journal of Computer Vision, 36(3):221–236, 2000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. R. Malladi, J.A. Sethian, and B.C. Vemuri. Evolutionary fronts for topology independent shape modeling and recovery. In Proc. of the 3rd ECCV, pages 3–13, Stockholm, Sweden, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  20. R. March. Visual reconstruction using variational methods. Image and Vision Computing, 10:30–38, 1992.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. J.-M. Morel and S. Solimini. Variational methods in image segmentation. Birkhäuser, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  22. D. Mumford and J. Shah. Boundary detection by minimizing functionals. In Proc. IEEE Conf. on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, San Francisco, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  23. T. Pavlidis and Y.-T. Liow. Integrating region growing and edge detection. In Proc. of IEEE CVPR, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  24. R. Ronfard. Region-based strategies for active contour models. International J. of Computer Vision, 13(2):229–251, 1994.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. C. Samson. Contribution la classification d’ images satellitaires par approche variationnelle et équations aux dérivées partielles. PhD thesis, Université de Nice-Sophia Antipolis, France, Septembre 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  26. C. Samson, L. Blanc-Féraud, G. Aubert, and J. Zerubia. A level set model for image classification. International Journal of Computer Vision, 40(3):189–197, December 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  27. C. Samson, L. Blanc-Féraud, G. Aubert, and J. Zerubia. A variational model for image classification and restoration. IEEE Trans. on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 22(5):460–472, May 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  28. G. Sapiro and D.L. Ringach. Anisotropic diffusion of multivalued images with applications to color filtering. IEEE Trans. on Image Procesing, 5(11):1582–1586, November 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  29. P. Sternberg and W.P. Zeimer. Local minimisers of a three-phase partition problem with triple junctions. Proc. of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, 124(A):1059–1073, 1994.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  30. M. Sussman, P. Smereka, and S. Osher. A level set approach for computing solutions to incompressible two-phase flow. J. of Computational Physics, 114:146–159, 1994.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  31. P. C. Teo, G. Sapiro, and B. A. Wandell. Creating connected representations of cortical gray matter for functional MRI visualization. IEEE Trans. on Medical Imaging, 16(6):852–863, 1997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. R. Whitaker and G. Gerig. Vector-valued diffusion. in computational imaging and vision: geometry driven diffusion in computer vision, Kluwer, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  33. S. Di Zenzo. A note on the gradient of a multi-image. CVGIP, 33:116–125, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  34. H-K. Zhao, T. Chan, B. Merriman, and S. Osher. A variational level set approach to multiphase motion. J. of Computational Physics, 127:179–195, 1996.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  35. S. C. Zhu and A. Yuille. Integrating region growing and edge detection. IEEE Trans. on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 18(9):884–900, 1996.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Samson, C., Blanc-Féraud, L., Aubert, G., Zerubia, J. (2001). Two Variational Models for Multispectral Image Classification. In: Figueiredo, M., Zerubia, J., Jain, A.K. (eds) Energy Minimization Methods in Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. EMMCVPR 2001. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2134. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44745-8_23

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44745-8_23

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-42523-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-44745-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics