Skip to main content

Concept-Based Image Retrieval Using the New Semantic Similarity Measurement

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Computational Science and Its Applications — ICCSA 2003 (ICCSA 2003)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 2667))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Semantic interpretation of image is incomplete without some mechanism for understanding semantic content that is not directly visible. For this reason, human assisted content-annotation through natural language is an at-tachment of textual description (i.e. a keyword, or a simple sentence) to image. However, keyword-based retrieval is in the level of syntactic pattern matching. In other words, dissimilarity computation among terms is usually done by using string matching not concept matching. In this paper, we present a solution for qualitative measurement of concept-based retrieval of annotated image. We propose a method for computerized conceptual similarity distance calculation in WordNet space. Also we have introduced method that applied similarity measurement on concept-based image retrieval. When tested on a image set of Microsoft’s ‘Design Gallery Live’, proposed method outperforms other approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. George A. Miller “Introduction to WordNet: An On-line Lexical Database”, International Journal of Lexicography, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Sussna “WordSense Disambiguation for Free-text Indexing Using a Massive Semantic Net-work” Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, CIKM’93.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Philip Resnik “Using Information Content to Evaluate Semantic Similarity in a Taxonomy” Proceedings of the 14th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  4. R. Richardson, A.F. Smeaton “Using WordNet in a Knowledge-Based Approach to Information Retrieval”, Working paper, CA-0395, School of Computer Applications, Dublin City University, Ireland, 1995

    Google Scholar 

  5. Eneko Agirre and German Rigau, “Word sense disambiguation using conceptual density”. In Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, pp. 16–22, Copenhagen, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Jay J Jiang, David W. Conrath “Semantic Similarity Based Corpus Statistics and Lexical Taxonomy”, Proc. Of International Conference Research on Computational Linguistics, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Y. Alp Aslandogan, et.al. “Using Semantic contents and WordNet in image retrieval”, Proceeding of ACM SIGIR 97, pp 286–295, Philadelphia PA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  8. J. Z. Wang, J. Li, D. Chan, G. Wiederhold, “Semantics-sensitive Retrieval or Digital Picture Libraries” D-Lib. Magazine, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Y.C. Park, F. Golshani, S. Panchanathan, “Conceptualization and Ontology: Tools for Effi-cient Storage and Retrieval of Semantic Visual Information”, Internet Multimedia Management Systems Conference, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Y.C. Park, P.K. Kim, F. Golshani, S. Panchanathan “Concept-based visual information management with large lexical corpus” DEXA, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  11. http://www.cogsci.princeton.edu/~wn/

  12. Kobus Barnard, Pinar Duygulu, David Forsyth “Clustering Art” In IEEE conf. on Computer vision and Pattern Recognition, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  13. K Barnard, D.A. Forsyth. “Learning the semantics of words and pictures. In int. Conf. on Computer Vision, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Guarino, N. and Welty, C. “Supporting Ontological Analysis of Taxonomic Relationships”. Data and Knowledge Engineering (in press), 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Budanitsky, A., and G. Hirst, “Semantic Distance in WordNet: An Experimental, Applica-tion-oriented Evaluation of Five Measures”, Workshop on WordNet and Other Lexical Re-sources, in the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (NAACL-2000), Pittsburgh, PA, June 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  16. K Barnard, P Duygulg, J.F.G. de Freitas, D.A. Forsyth “Object Recognition as Machine Translation: Learning a Lexicon for a Fixed Image vocabulary”, Seventh European Conference on Computer Vision, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Choi, J., Cho, M., Park, S.H., Kim, P. (2003). Concept-Based Image Retrieval Using the New Semantic Similarity Measurement. In: Kumar, V., Gavrilova, M.L., Tan, C.J.K., L’Ecuyer, P. (eds) Computational Science and Its Applications — ICCSA 2003. ICCSA 2003. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2667. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44839-X_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44839-X_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-40155-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-44839-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics