Skip to main content

Examining Technology Acceptance by Individual Law Enforcement Officers: An Exploratory Study

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 2665))

Abstract

Management of technology implementation has been a critical challenge to organizations, public or private. In particular, user acceptance is paramount to the ultimate success of a newly implemented technology in adopting organizations. This study examined acceptance of COPLINK, a suite of IT applications designed to support law enforcement officers’ analyses of criminal activities. We developed a factor model that explains or predicts individual officers’ acceptance decision-making and empirically tested this model using a survey study that involved more than 280 police officers. Overall, our model shows a reasonably good fit to officers’ acceptance assessments and exhibits satisfactory explanatory power. Our analysis suggests a prominent core influence path from efficiency gain to perceived usefulness and then to intention to accept. Subjective norm also appears to have a significant effect on user acceptance through the mediation of perceived usefulness. Several managerial implications derived from our study findings are also discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ajzen, I., “From Intention to Actions: A Theory of Planned Behavior,” in: Kuhl J. and Beckmann (eds): Action Control: From Cognition to Behavior, Springer Verlag, New York, 1985, pp. 11–39.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ajzen, I., “The Theory of Planned Behavior,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Vol. 50, 1991, pp. 179–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bandura, A., “Self-efficacy: Toward a Unifying Theory of Behavioral Change,” Psychological Review, Vol. 84, 1977, pp. 191–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Chau, P.Y.K., “An Empirical Assessment of a Modified Technology Acceptance Model,” Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol. 13, No. 2, 1996, pp. 185–204.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chau, P.Y.K, and Hu, P.J., “Examining a Model for Information Technology Acceptance by Individual Professionals: An Exploratory Study”, Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol. 18, No. 4, 2002, pp. 191–229.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Chen, H., Schroeder, J., V. Hauck, R., Ridgeway, L., Atabakhsh, H., Gupta, H., Boarman, C., Rasmussen, K., and Clements, A.W., “COPLINK Connect: Information and Knowledge Management for Law Enforcement,” Decision Support Systems, Vol. 34, No. 3, 2003, pp. 271–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Chen, H., Zeng, D., Atabakhsh, H., Wyzga, W., and Schroeder, J., “COPLINK: Managing Law Enforcement Data and Knowledge,” Communications of the ACM, Vol. 46, No. 1, 2003, pp. 28–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Compeau, D.R., and Higgins, C.A., “Computer Self-Efficacy: Development of a Measure and Initial Test,” MIS Quarterly, Vol. 19, 1995, pp. 189–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Cooper, R.B., and Zmud, R.W., “Information technology implementation research: A technology diffusion approach,” Management Science, Vol. 34, No. 2, 1990, pp. 123–139.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Davis, F.D., “Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology,” MIS Quarterly, Vol. 13, No. 3, September 1989, pp. 319–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Davis, F.D., Bagozzi, R.P., and Warshaw, P.R., “User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models,” Management Science, Vol. 35, No. 8, 1989, pp. 982–1003.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Fishbein, M. and Ajzen, I., Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Gattiker, U.E., “Managing Computer-based Office Information Technology: A Process Model for Management in Human Factors in Organizational Design,” in H. Hendrick and O. Brown (eds), Human Factors in Organizational Design, Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, The Nethelands, 1984, pp. 395–403.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Goodhue, D.L. and Thompson, R.L., “Task-Technology Fit and Individual Performance,” MIS Quarterly, Vol. 19, No. 2, June 1995, pp. 213–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Igbaria, M., Guimaraes, T. and Davis, G.B., “Testing the Determinants of Microcomputer Usage via a Structural Equation Model,” Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol. 11, No. 4, 1995, pp. 87–114.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Keen, P., Shaping the Future: Business Design through Information Technology, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Mathieson, K., “Predicting User Intention: Comparing the Technology Acceptance Model with Theory of Planned Behavior,” Information Systems Research, Vol. 2, No. 3, 1991, pp. 173–191.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Moore, G.C. and Benbasat, I., “Development of an Instrument to Measure the Perception of Adopting an Information Technology Innovation,” Information Systems Research, Vol. 2, No. 3, 1991, pp. 192–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Nunnally, J.C., Psychometric Theory, 2nd edn, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Rogers, E.M., Diffusion of Innovations, 4th edn, Free Press, New York, NY, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Straub, D.W., “Validating Instruments in MIS Research,” MIS Quarterly, Vol. 13, No. 2, 1989, pp. 147–169.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. Szajna, B., “Empirical Evaluation of the Revised TAM,” Management Science, Vol. 42, No. 1, 1996, pp. 85–92.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Taylor, S. and Todd, P.A., “Understanding Information Technology Usage: A Test of Competing Models,” Information Systems Research, Vol. 6, No. 1, 1995, pp. 144–176.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Tornatzky, L.G. and Klein, K.J., “Innovation Characteristics and Innovation Adoption Implementation: A Meta-Analysis of Findings,” IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, Vol. 29, No. 1, 1982, pp. 28–45.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Venkatesh, V. and Davis, F.D., “A Model of the Antecedents of Perceived Ease of Use: Development and Test,” Decision Sciences, Vol. 27, No. 3, 1996, pp. 451–482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Venkatesh, V. and Davis, F.D., “A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four longitudinal studies,” Management Science, Vol. 46, No. 2, 2000, pp. 186–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Venkatesh, V., “Determinants of Perceived Ease of Use: Integrating Control, Intrinsic Motivation, and Emotion into the Technology Acceptance Model,” Information Systems Research, Vol. 11, No. 4, 2000, pp. 342–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Hu, P.JH., Lin, C., Chen, H. (2003). Examining Technology Acceptance by Individual Law Enforcement Officers: An Exploratory Study. In: Chen, H., Miranda, R., Zeng, D.D., Demchak, C., Schroeder, J., Madhusudan, T. (eds) Intelligence and Security Informatics. ISI 2003. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2665. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44853-5_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44853-5_16

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-40189-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-44853-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics