Skip to main content

Size-Change Termination for Term Rewriting

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 2706))

Abstract

In [13], a new size-change principle was proposed to verify termination of functional programs automatically. We extend this principle in order to prove termination and innermost termination of arbitrary term rewrite systems (TRSs). Moreover, we compare this approach with existing techniques for termination analysis of TRSs (such as recursive path orderings or dependency pairs). It turns out that the size-change principle on its own fails for many examples that can be handled by standard techniques for rewriting, but there are also TRSs where it succeeds whereas existing rewriting techniques fail. In order to benefit from their respective advantages, we show how to combine the size-change principle with classical orderings and with dependency pairs. In this way, we obtain a new approach for automated termination proofs of TRSs which is more powerful than previous approaches.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. T. Arts and J. Giesl. Termination of term rewriting using dependency pairs. Theoretical Computer Science, 236:133–178, 2000.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. T. Arts and J. Giesl. A collection of examples for termination of term rewriting using dependency pairs. Technical Report AIB-2001-09, RWTH Aachen, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  3. F. Baader and T. Nipkow. Term Rewriting and All That. Cambr. Univ. Pr., 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  4. C. Borralleras, M. Ferreira, and A. Rubio. Complete monotonic semantic path orderings. In Proc. 17th CADE, LNAI 1831, pages 346–364, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  5. N. Dershowitz. Termination of rewriting. J. Symbolic Comp., 3:69–116, 1987.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. O. Fissore, I. Gnaedig, and H. Kirchner. Induction for termination with local strategies. In Proc. 4th Int. Workshop Strategies in Aut. Ded., ENTCS 58, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  7. J. Giesl and T. Arts. Verification of Erlang processes by dependency pairs. Appl. Algebra in Engineering, Communication and Computing, 12(1,2):39–72, 2001.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. J. Giesl, T. Arts, and E. Ohlebusch. Modular termination proofs for rewriting using dependency pairs. Journal of Symbolic Computation, 34(1):21–58, 2002.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. S. Kamin and J. J. Lévy. Two generalizations of the recursive path ordering. Unpublished Manuscript, University of Illinois, IL, USA, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  10. D. Knuth and P. Bendix. Simple word problems in universal algebras. In J. Leech, editor, Comp. Problems in Abstr. Algebra, pages 263–297. Pergamon, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  11. K. Kusakari, M. Nakamura, and Y. Toyama. Argument filtering transformation. In Proc. 1st PPDP, LNCS 1702, pages 48–62, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  12. D. Lankford. On proving term rewriting systems are Noetherian. Technical Report MTP-3, Louisiana Technical University, Ruston, LA, USA, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  13. C._S. Lee, N. D. Jones, and A. M. Ben-Amram. The size-change principle for program termination. In Proc. POPL’ 01, pages 81–92, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  14. R. Thiemann and J. Giesl. Size-change termination for term rewriting. Report AIB-2003-02, RWTH Aachen, 2003. http://aib.informatik.rwth-aachen.de.

  15. Y. Toyama. Counterexamples to the termination for the direct sum of term rewriting systems. Information Processing Letters, 25:141–143, 1987.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Thiemann, R., Giesl, J. (2003). Size-Change Termination for Term Rewriting. In: Nieuwenhuis, R. (eds) Rewriting Techniques and Applications. RTA 2003. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2706. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44881-0_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44881-0_19

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-40254-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-44881-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics