Skip to main content

Polarized Proof Nets with Cycles and Fixpoints Semantics

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Typed Lambda Calculi and Applications (TLCA 2003)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 2701))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Starting from Laurent’s work on Polarized Linear Logic, we define a new polarized linear deduction system which handles recursion. This is achieved by extending the cut-rule, in such a way that iteration unrolling is achieved by cut-elimination. The proof nets counterpart of this extension is obtained by allowing oriented cycles, which had no meaning in usual polarized linear logic. We also free proof nets from additional constraints, leading up to a correctness criterion as straightforward as possible (since almost all proof structures are correct). Our system has a sound semantics expressed in traced models.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Z. M. Ariola and J.W. Klop, Cyclic Lambda Graph Rewriting. In Proc. of the Eight IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science, Paris, July 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  2. N. Benton and M. Hyland, Traced Premonoidal Categories (Extended Abstract). Workshop on Fixed Points in Computer Science (FICS 2002). July 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  3. V. Danos, Une Application de la Logique Linéaire à l’étude des Processus de Normalisation (principalement du λ-calcul). Thèse de Doctorat, Université Paris 7, 1990

    Google Scholar 

  4. J-Y. Girard, Linear Logic. Theoretical Computer Science 50:1–102, 1987.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. M. Hasegawa, Recursion from Cyclic Sharing: Traced Monoidal Categories and Models of Cyclic Lambda Calculi. In Proc. 3rd International Conference on Typed Lambda Calculi and Applications, volume LNCS 1210. Springer, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  6. M. Hasegawa and Y. Kakutani, Axioms for recursion in call-by-value. Higher-Order and Symbolic Computation 15(2/3):235–264, September 2002

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. M. Hofmann and T. Streicher, Continuation models are universal for lambda-mucalculus. In Proc. LICS’ 97, Warsaw, IEEE, pp. 387–397.

    Google Scholar 

  8. A. Joyal, R. Street and D. Verity, Traced monoidal categories. Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 119(3), pages 447–468, 1996.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. O. Laurent, Etude de la polarisation en logique. PHD thesis, Université Aix-Marseille II, March 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  10. O. Laurent, Polarized games (extended abstract). Seventeenth annual IEEE symposium on Logic In Computer Science, p. 265–274. IEEE Computer Society, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  11. O. Laurent, Polarized proof nets and λμ-calculus. Theoretical Computer Science, 290(1):161–188, Dec. 2002.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. P-A. Melliès and P. Selinger, Polarized categories and polarized games. Forthcoming paper, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  13. R. Montelatici, Présentation axiomatique de théorèmes de complétude forte en sémantique des jeux et en logique classique. Mémoire de DEA, Univ. Paris 7, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  14. M. Parigot, λμ-calculus: an algorithmic interpretation of classical natural deduction. In Proc. of International Conference on Logic Programming and Automated Deduction, volume LNCS 624. Springer, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  15. P. Selinger, Control Categories and Duality: on the Categorical Semantics of the Lambda-Mu Calculus. Mathematical Structures in Computer Science, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  16. A. K. Simpson and G. D. Plotkin, Complete Axioms for Categorical Fixed-Point Operators. In Logic in Computer Science, pages 30–41, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Montelatici, R. (2003). Polarized Proof Nets with Cycles and Fixpoints Semantics. In: Hofmann, M. (eds) Typed Lambda Calculi and Applications. TLCA 2003. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2701. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44904-3_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44904-3_18

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-40332-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-44904-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics